« on: January 20, 2014, 10:16:54 AM »
The site is back up and running.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Ok, I put my Tamron 90mm F/2.8 Di Macro up for sale today....
do not waste your money on this crappy lens , it is a good lens optically but its mechanical quality is very bad.
it is cheap and there are many reasons for it.
my 24-70VC and 90 macro broke up into many pieces just after a few months of light use.
and , I sold them and decided never get Tamron, Samyong and Tokina.
I think Sigmas primes are fine but Sigma zooms are also as fragile as Tamrons'.
Great review and wonderful set of images Dustin. I wouldn't expect anything less from you
OK, back to sample images made with Sony a7 ... this one is made from a moving car at 28mm, f/4, ISO 3200, 1/160 sec.
Do you think it's a worthwhile upgrade for those who have the 'old' non-VC version??
I definitely do, particularly since you get not only a slightly sharper macro lens, but also because you get a much more effective modern medium telephoto with a great stabilizer. The new lens does a lot of things really well and doubles as a great general purpose lens. I think its worth the upgrade, particularly if you can get a decent price on the used market for your old one.
Thanks, I may consider putting this lens in my upgrade path. I really like that the new version is non-extending. FWIW the image quality from the old macro is fabulous, not so much the looks of the thing...
I haven't used the old version myself, but your report confirms what pretty much everyone has said. I'm surprised the new lens hasn't had more buzz, but that may be because it was overpriced (particularly in Europe) on introduction. It is a very worthy lens, though, and a great choice now that the price is reasonable.
Because I hadn't used my 90mm macro for a while, and because I wanted to reconfirm the focal length and working distance on a full frame body (I'm selling my 7D), I took the lens to the zoo. 90 mm macro still works for me at least for butterflies, even on full frame but an image stabilizer would be very welcome.
I gave my 70-200+1.4 TC a go as well, but without a 1.6 crop factor the maximum magnification isn't quite sufficient for butterflies and such. That makes a good near focusing lens something I require more than before.
Hence, based on your review I'm strongly considering upgrading to the new version - for the convenience of the image stabilizer mostly. I'm sticking with Tamron for macro use, because as I mentioned before I don't do enough macro to justify an 'L' lens.
There's still nothing wrong with the image quality from the old lens, here's a few samples that I took today. Note that it was rather dark and the excellent high iso performance of the 5DMkIII is a real asset:
A few shots from the recording studio.
I like the mixing console image the best...
I agree with Carl. I haven't used the 24mm f/2.8 IS, but I have the 35mm f/2 IS and it is awesome. These new little primes haven't got a lot of fanfare, but they are really exceptional lenses.
the first picture i post on this forum, i just registered, i own a 50L, true it is expensive, true it s not the sharpness but models don t like sharpness . it s good to have a lens not that sharp than the others to create differents pictures.
lina par telemaq76, sur Flickr
maybe it's because he is under nda ?As this is a variable aperture lens, does anybody know at what focal lengths the aperture changes happen?
I do, and I will be sharing that exact information in my upcoming review (which will be allowed to go live next week).
Why are you holding back such a small snippet of information - it will hardly spoil your review?
Are you under a non-disclosure agreement or are you just holding back information?