January 30, 2015, 07:49:17 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - jdramirez

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16 17 ... 180
211
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Tips on shooting hockey?
« on: November 07, 2014, 06:42:21 PM »
Good luck jd :)Looking forward to seeing the results.

Are there cheerleaders @ hockey games... I would not guess, because their HIGH BEAMS would be on all night long...

212
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Recommend first slr
« on: November 07, 2014, 05:34:47 PM »
It's hard to impress on them that changing the lenses is where the fun really begins with an slr!
I am leaning towards the 600d or 700d (t3, t5i) and kit 18-55 and a prime. I think a prime is very important to learn photography.

Agreed... tonight I'm going to go and shoot a high school hockey game for S___s and gigs...

I'm taking an 85L mkii, a 70-200mm f/2.8L is mkii, and a 24-105mm f/4L is... and I imagine each and every lens will serve it's purpose tonight. 

213
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Recommend first slr
« on: November 07, 2014, 05:16:47 PM »
Keep it simple.

I suggest a Canon T3i or a Pentax K-3 or K-5 IIs, a single prime lens in the so called 'standard' range of 35, 40 or 50mm. No need for a beginner to use faster than f1.8.

Both brands include a pop up flash, with a little experience, upgrade to off camera flash.
 
Just looked at B&H prices, yikes, Pentax lenses are higher than I expected. Pentax 40mm pancake is ~ USD $550, Canon's is only USD $200.

My only issue with the pop up flash is that we all agree that flash directly over the lens without any kind of diffuser (and even with a diffuser) looks pretty awful. 

so the cheaper the body, but with a decent ettl speedlite (while bouncing) is a significant improvement... or using a wide aperture prime. 

Using an SLR is to get away from images that resemble point and shoot or camera phone images. 


214
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Recommend first slr
« on: November 07, 2014, 03:20:36 PM »
When first starting out, you should explore a lot of different possibilities. I'd recommend the Canon T5 kit w/ 18-55mm & 55-250mm lenses. Add an extra battery and a 50mm f/1.8 lens. That's your budget right there.

There has been some good advice in this thread so I felt no need to give my 2ct, but I agree with the above doesn't seem like a good idea - esp. paying a lot of $$$ and ending up with the ultra-crappy ancient 50/1.8 which is the absolute reverse of the "glass first" mantra.

One other reason in addition to those jdramirez gave: Having too many lenses around can be a hassle for a beginner, nobody likes changing lenses and it can take the fun away. Having lenses with very thin dof can also be difficult for beginners. Better start with an older crop camera body and a single good ef-s lens like the ef-s 15-85 which covers more reach, then start shooting, then think again where to go from there.

I like the 50mm more than you, but when I first got it I was ignorant and a little stupid.  I shot everything at f1.8 and I didn't know it was soft until you get to f2.8 or so.  I think having someone to tell the newb the limitations of their gear will help a ton.

The 50 @f2.8 was my favorite lens over the kit and the 55-250mm.  The image quality and the thinner dof was huge in comparison... But for a crop, 35mm is more manageable.

215
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Recommend first slr
« on: November 07, 2014, 02:42:12 PM »
When first starting out, you should explore a lot of different possibilities. I'd recommend the Canon T5 kit w/ 18-55mm & 55-250mm lenses. Add an extra battery and a 50mm f/1.8 lens. That's your budget right there.

In a while, add the 10-18mm lens if you find yourself using wide angle a lot.

That's my philosophy. Others will urge you to pick one lens and master it before adding anything else. I just think you should know your options in case you eventually want to invest more in photography.

Also, I wouldn't recommend the Canon M as your only camera -- I love mine, but it's very difficult to use in bright daylight. The screen is too reflective to see what you're doing, and there's no other viewfinder.

I say this half heartedly since I started with the kit and had the 55-250 as well... But shooting at f5.6 isn't a dream... especially indoors... So the flash pops up if your in auto and your shots look like point and shoot images, or you shoot in av, tv ,etc, and your iso kicks up so much that your images look grainy and unusable.

I did suggest a cheap 430ex and learning how to bounce... well that may have been implied, but give me that, an older camera, and a better lens any day. 

216
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Tips on shooting hockey?
« on: November 07, 2014, 12:46:34 PM »
I'm going to take a stab at shooting hockey tonight... I'll let y'all know how bad of a job I do.

217
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Recommend first slr
« on: November 07, 2014, 12:44:30 PM »
If I may say... the 24-105 had its problems, distortion, chromatic aberrations, f4 max aperture, but as a beginner lens, it is spectacular.  Shall,  good color rendition, nice range even on a crop... So getting that lens paired with any beginning body would be an incredible combo provided the shooter isn't all about primes... which is ok...

Primes are great, but most beginners don't go that route initially.

218
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Recommend first slr
« on: November 07, 2014, 10:58:08 AM »
You can't go wrong with either Canon or Nikon, both manufacturer produce excellent cameras and lenses.

Why restrict it to only those two manufacturers?

I've said a very similar sentiment to people who ask my opinion.

Usually why I don't suggest Sony or Pentax is because of residual value.  There are more Canon/Nikon shooters in the world and do the out of people you can sell your old gear to is much larger. 


So if you decide slrs aren't for you, you can get out without losing your shirt.  If you decide to upgrade, c/n hold their value better so you can use the funds from that to defray the cost of your new lens.

I'm sure a bunch of people have seen gear on Craigslist that just sits there for an eternity...

219
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Recommend first slr
« on: November 07, 2014, 09:42:13 AM »
I'd lean towards a t3 for $300, sell the kit lens for $75.  Then but a 35 f2 is, or a 24-105, or maybe an 85 f1.8, or the 35 and a 55-250mm is..

I'd scrimp on the body, but pair it will some decent lenses... Maybe $100 for a 430 ex..

220
EOS Bodies / Re: do you hope for sony sensors in the 5D MK 4?
« on: November 06, 2014, 03:00:31 PM »
Jim Brown was an all American at both lacrosse and football... So it isn't a given that a split goal won't work.

I have almost zero use for video.  While I appreciate that many users do have a use for video I think Canon and most other companies have moved away from the essence of a stills camera. 

Will there come a point where the bestest still camera and the bestest video camera will be incompatable on the same body?

I also don't care about video and I wonder if my still cameras could be "better" if the design concentrated on still photography instead of video.

If a camera tries to be the best at both, is there a point when it ends up being the best at neither?

221
EOS Bodies / Re: do you hope for sony sensors in the 5D MK 4?
« on: November 06, 2014, 02:55:16 PM »
I feel that this conversation is predicated on Nikon's decision.  They outsourced the sensors... So why didn't Canon.  Obviously don't is willing to sell their technology.

If Nikon kept their tech in house, I'm guessing there wouldn't be as much belly aching. 


222
EOS Bodies / Re: do you hope for sony sensors in the 5D MK 4?
« on: November 06, 2014, 11:59:52 AM »
I don't care, because I'm skipping the miiv generation and probably won't upgrade until the mkv.

223
Lenses / Re: Another EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS II Mention
« on: November 05, 2014, 08:57:25 PM »
I will be very interested in this lens once my bank account reloads.  Wait maybe I should say even more interested.  I am already very interested. ;D

I'm feeling pretty good about my gear... so I have a goal of building my camera fund to $10,000 before I make any major purchases.

224
Lenses / Re: Another EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS II Mention
« on: November 05, 2014, 08:55:50 PM »
I really enjoy holding the camera and lens from the tripod collar.  It feels balanced and a solid handle.  It might not be necessary, but I use it all the time with my 5d mkiii and 70-200mm f/2.8L is mkii. 

225
Lenses / Re: Another EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS II Mention
« on: November 05, 2014, 08:48:31 PM »
70-300L killer? I'll happily trade that in if the 100-400L II will fit in my travel bag!

Wishfull thinking...

I understood the 70-300 was optically better than the original 100-400... and didn't have as much of a dust issue... so I could see why one would sacrifice the 100mm reach... but if the mkii 100-400 is optically better than the 70-300L, I'm not sure what benefits the 70-300 has... maybe price... and technically a larger zoom ratio. 


Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16 17 ... 180