Gear Talk > Canon General

70-200 F2.8 mark I or mark II?!

<< < (2/5) > >>

cliffwang:
I had two 70-200 MK1 lenses and have the 70-200 MK2.  I can tell you MK2 is MUCH better than MK1.

AudioGlenn:
+1 more vote for the Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II

Pixelsign:
the new tamron 70-200 with VC (IS) should be a great lens too. but the canon 70-200 mkII is the unquestionable king of them all ;) .

that1guyy:

--- Quote from: Pixelsign on January 06, 2013, 03:36:18 AM ---the new tamron 70-200 with VC (IS) should be a great lens too. but the canon 70-200 mkII is the unquestionable king of them all ;) .

--- End quote ---
Yes, worth looking into the Tamron version if you want to save money on the mark ii but still get almost as good quality.

Viggo:
Well of course the mk2 is wayway better in every aspect and not just a tad. But if you're like me it's a lens I hardly ever used and therefor completely stupid to pay that price for.. However I just the other day picked up a 70-200 2.8 non-is for $350 and then it suddenly is a super bargain an totally worth to own, even if I use it no more than twice a year..

Never missed the mk1 or the mk2 when I sold them..

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version