May 22, 2013, 05:36:06 AM

Author Topic: Two Lens or One? Which to get.  (Read 1006 times)

BokChoiTV

  • PowerShot G15
  • **
  • Posts: 19
    • View Profile
Two Lens or One? Which to get.
« on: February 26, 2013, 10:22:25 PM »
So I currently have a choice between the 70-200mm f/4 IS
or both the 17-40mm f/4 AND 24-105 f/4 IS.

From my sources, both are around 1100$.
What should I do?


I'm using a 5D Mk III
Mainly doing video and outside video, only have a 50mm 1.4 at the moment.

canon rumors FORUM

Two Lens or One? Which to get.
« on: February 26, 2013, 10:22:25 PM »

robbymack

  • 7D
  • *****
  • Posts: 410
    • View Profile
Re: Two Lens or One? Which to get.
« Reply #1 on: February 26, 2013, 10:32:12 PM »
It not a video guy so take this with a grain of salt, I'd actually probably only get one of either the 17-40 or 24-105. Seeing as you already have a 50mm I'd probably say get the 17-40 now used maybe $500 or so which leaves you with $600 towards a 70-200, few more months of savings and you'll have the 70-200 used maybe $900ish.

neuroanatomist

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 8632
    • View Profile
Re: Two Lens or One? Which to get.
« Reply #2 on: February 26, 2013, 10:37:42 PM »
You have a 50mm lens.  Do you want wider, longer, or both? If you want wider or both, get the 17-40 and 24-105.  If you want only longer, get the 70-200mm f/4L IS. 
EOS 1D X, EOS 7D, and lots of lenses
_____________________________
Flickr | TDP Profile/Gear List

jdramirez

  • 6D
  • *****
  • Posts: 517
    • View Profile
Re: Two Lens or One? Which to get.
« Reply #3 on: February 26, 2013, 11:25:51 PM »
The IS on the 24-105 will be huge.  There are plenty of videos out there showing its prowess.  I think the 17-40 might be a touch redundant... and it a little soft for photos until it is stopped down to f/8 or so... I'm not sure about video, but usually the 17-40 is a stepping stone for people interested in L quality... but it isn't really a good L lens.

You can find the 24-105 for around $750... and then save up for the 70-200mm f/4L IS.  I haven't used it... but it has a great reputation.
XS -> 60D -> 5d Mkiii : 18-55 -> 24-105L : 75-300mm -> 55-250mm -> 70-300mm -> 70-200mm f4L USM -> 70-200mm f/2.8L USM -> 70-200mm f/2.8L IS Mkii : 50mm f/1.8 -> 50mm f/1.4 & 100mm f/2.8L macro : 8mm fisheye for kicks.

Rienzphotoz

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1166
  • Peace unto all ye Canon & Nikon users
    • View Profile
Re: Two Lens or One? Which to get.
« Reply #4 on: February 27, 2013, 01:49:57 AM »
So I currently have a choice between the 70-200mm f/4 IS
or both the 17-40mm f/4 AND 24-105 f/4 IS.

From my sources, both are around 1100$.
What should I do?


I'm using a 5D Mk III
Mainly doing video and outside video, only have a 50mm 1.4 at the moment.
For video definately the 24-105 f/4 L IS ... coz it is a lot easier to do handheld video than a 17-40 which does not have IS (and it has too much barrell distortion for my liking) ... I never used the f/4 verison of 70-200 as I have the f/2.8 L IS II version ... between my 24-105 and 70-200 I prefer the 24-105 any day ... I do a lot of rig move videos in the desert and I find the 24-105 to be perfect both for its focal length as well its image stabilization. But if you are doing lots of video indoors (especailly for interviewing people close-up) than the 70-200 is AWESOME.
5D MK III, 16-35/2.8 L II, 24-70/2.8 VC, 24-105/4 L IS, 70-200/2.8 L IS II, 100/2.8 L IS, 40/2.8, 50/1.4, 85/1.8, 150-500 OS, 600EX-RTx2, ST-E3-RT, Rokinon 24/3.5 T-S, D7100+18-300 VR, YN568EX, 055CXPRO4+468MGRC2, 190CXPRO4+322RC2, Gorillapod Focus+496RC2, CamRanger, B+W filters, Konova K3/31.5 etc

rowlandw

  • PowerShot G15
  • **
  • Posts: 4
    • View Profile
Re: Two Lens or One? Which to get.
« Reply #5 on: February 27, 2013, 04:21:48 PM »
I'm not a videographer but I have all three lenses.  If I could only have one lens it would be the 24-105.  If you already have a crop camera, the 24-105 on full frame + 70-200 on crop makes a terrific pairing, which I use.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Two Lens or One? Which to get.
« Reply #5 on: February 27, 2013, 04:21:48 PM »