Isn't there something missing in canon pro-bodies......
No one is talking or complaining about this defficiency.
The most important thing missing now in Canon bodies is the artilating or the tilt screen.
Why it is so important:
- First, the full function of liveview is achived throuhg tilt screen. For instance if you have a live view body with a tilt screen, with a high speed shutter you may rise the camera up from head, make precise focues and shot
- Second, the full function of video recording is agaain based on tilt screen. Have you ever seen any video camrea with a fixed screen or visor. the only horizonat use of visor is on proffessional shoulder camaras. Now tehre are reaay very strange gadgets to let recompansate the lack of tilt screen for video recording cameras.
- Finally most of studio photogrpagy, almost alll macrophotography requires tripod + live view + tilt screen, other vise in half an hour you will vomit or become astigmat by loking one eye closed
I really can not understand why people don't mind this problem and talking about HD video or megapixel or frame per second, if the ergonomy limits you even 120mgeapixel will not make any change in the camera.
As a professional photogrpaher I never need a 18mp image, 3000X4000 is always ok for me, in a weel exposured and high detailed censor without making interpolation or artificial enhabcement.
What I need is more burrons on the dial wheel for more custum functions, for instance one for low light low ISO fast aparature, one another low light mid ISO high shutter with aff assist of external flash but without bursting it.
one fore mirror lock-up for macro photogrpahy with low ISO but slow aparature with mid iso for high depth of field
one another macro mode without mirror lock up mid ISO high shutetr with external flas burst both for fast mowing insects.
For the rest: A, S, P is ok
Looking for your support to suppress Canon to put articulating screen and custum functions as standart at least for mid and high end cameras, and not to try to cheat us playing with ISO range (without making noise improvements) and high pixels which is not the most necessary thig