December 22, 2014, 07:14:57 AM

Author Topic: New EOS-1 in 2014 [CR1]  (Read 33799 times)

Woody

  • 5D Mark III
  • ******
  • Posts: 664
    • View Profile
Re: New EOS-1 in 2014 [CR1]
« Reply #30 on: November 20, 2013, 11:36:01 AM »
Like I said before. Canon's "Answer" to the Nikon D800 (and future D900, and the Sony A7R) will come as a big bulky elephant sized 1D-body, with a price tag that most people can't touch. :D

Oh Canon..

I don't particularly care if the high pixel sensor is stuffed in a 1D body or 5D body.

I'm more curious about the sensor performance, particularly its low ISO dynamic range. If Canon shows no improvement in this department, it's unlikely we'll see anything better coming out of Canon sensors in the next 4 to 5 years. Now, that will be really depressing.  :'(

canon rumors FORUM

Re: New EOS-1 in 2014 [CR1]
« Reply #30 on: November 20, 2013, 11:36:01 AM »

sanj

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1728
    • View Profile
Re: New EOS-1 in 2014 [CR1]
« Reply #31 on: November 20, 2013, 11:47:42 AM »
But will they be doing a white version?  ;)

The best comment EVER…. :)

neuroanatomist

  • CR GEEK
  • ************
  • Posts: 15234
    • View Profile
Re: New EOS-1 in 2014 [CR1]
« Reply #32 on: November 20, 2013, 11:48:46 AM »
I'm more curious about the sensor performance, particularly its low ISO dynamic range. If Canon shows no improvement in this department, it's unlikely we'll see anything better coming out of Canon sensors in the next 4 to 5 years.

This is a good example of why we should be oh so concerned about sales figures.  Canon has been behind in low ISO dynamic range throughout their sensor lineup for a few years now, and it hasn't hurt their dSLR sales. 

If the roof on your house looks to be in excellent shape and doesn't leak, would you replace it?  Unlikely…if it ain't broke, don't fix it.  From Canon's perspective, their sensors 'ain't broke'.
EOS 1D X, EOS M, and lots of lenses
______________________________
Flickr | TDP Profile/Gear List

JohnDizzo15

  • Canon 6D
  • *****
  • Posts: 443
    • View Profile
Re: New EOS-1 in 2014 [CR1]
« Reply #33 on: November 20, 2013, 11:53:49 AM »
I'm more curious about the sensor performance, particularly its low ISO dynamic range. If Canon shows no improvement in this department, it's unlikely we'll see anything better coming out of Canon sensors in the next 4 to 5 years.

This is a good example of why we should be oh so concerned about sales figures.  Canon has been behind in low ISO dynamic range throughout their sensor lineup for a few years now, and it hasn't hurt their dSLR sales. 

If the roof on your house looks to be in excellent shape and doesn't leak, would you replace it?  Unlikely…if it ain't broke, don't fix it.  From Canon's perspective, their sensors 'ain't broke'.

Exactly.

It consistently seems hard for people to wrap their minds around the fact that these companies exist for profit and not for consumer pleasure.

sanj

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1728
    • View Profile
Re: New EOS-1 in 2014 [CR1]
« Reply #34 on: November 20, 2013, 11:58:56 AM »
Like I said before. Canon's "Answer" to the Nikon D800 (and future D900, and the Sony A7R) will come as a big bulky elephant sized 1D-body, with a price tag that most people can't touch.

Ok, then...but what are Nikon and Sony's "Answers" to the 5DIII, which has outsold the D800 and will vastly outsell the a7R?   ::)

Why do people think Canon needs to play Nikon's game?  The D800 was Nikon's attempt to play the game by Canon's rules (we'll see your 8-9 MP increase, and raise you by another 14 MP), and Nikon lost.
When someone attacks a Canon body, you always resort to raw sales. That'S not very interesting.

I agree. We need to look at more than 'numbers sold'. For example there are great movies that have not done super business at the box office. But they have been amazing.
To say Nikon 'lost' is perhaps harsh. As the IQ of the D800 is certainly better than 5d3. A photographer friend who switched from 5d2 to D800 showed me comparisons on his laptop and I cannot any longer defend the IQ of 5d3 vs D800. I do realize 'but but' of autofocus, responsiveness etc but am talking just about IQ.

Eldar

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1763
    • View Profile
    • Flickr
Re: New EOS-1 in 2014 [CR1]
« Reply #35 on: November 20, 2013, 11:58:56 AM »
If the roof on your house looks to be in excellent shape and doesn't leak, would you replace it?  Unlikely…if it ain't broke, don't fix it.  From Canon's perspective, their sensors 'ain't broke'.
This is actually a concern of mine. I´ve been thinking through what I really really want. And higher resolution is not on top of the the list. DR (at any ISO) is.

I love the fast fps of the 1DX. But it creates a lot of data to be processed. If we doubled/tripled resolution, well then I´d have to go looking for more computing power, which I am more than happy to do, by the way, but less happy if DR performance remained where it is.

As for price, I believe Canon has very good contact with the market. They have absolutely no interest in sending a new product on the market, only to satisfy an exclusive minority. I know I´m saying this after some really horrendous pricing examples, but still.
5DIII, 1DX, 8-15/4L, 16-35 f4L IS, 24-70/2.8L II, 70-200/2.8L IS II, 70-300/4-5.6L IS, 200-400/4L IS 1.4x, Zeiss 15/2.8, 17/4L TS-E, Zeiss 21/2.8, 24/3.5L TS-E II, Zeiss 35/1.4, Zeiss Otus 55/1.4, Zeiss Otus 85/1.4, 100/2.8L IS Macro, Zeiss 135/2, 600/4L IS II

sanj

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1728
    • View Profile
Re: New EOS-1 in 2014 [CR1]
« Reply #36 on: November 20, 2013, 12:06:46 PM »
I'm more curious about the sensor performance, particularly its low ISO dynamic range. If Canon shows no improvement in this department, it's unlikely we'll see anything better coming out of Canon sensors in the next 4 to 5 years.

This is a good example of why we should be oh so concerned about sales figures.  Canon has been behind in low ISO dynamic range throughout their sensor lineup for a few years now, and it hasn't hurt their dSLR sales. 

If the roof on your house looks to be in excellent shape and doesn't leak, would you replace it?  Unlikely…if it ain't broke, don't fix it.  From Canon's perspective, their sensors 'ain't broke'.

This is an ostrich act of not facing reality by digging its face in sand. Canon sensor is certainly broke after comparing it with the D800 and Rx1. Like it or not.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: New EOS-1 in 2014 [CR1]
« Reply #36 on: November 20, 2013, 12:06:46 PM »

Orangutan

  • 1D Mark IV
  • ******
  • Posts: 772
    • View Profile
Re: New EOS-1 in 2014 [CR1]
« Reply #37 on: November 20, 2013, 12:10:02 PM »
I agree. We need to look at more than 'numbers sold'. For example there are great movies that have not done super business at the box office. But they have been amazing.
To say Nikon 'lost' is perhaps harsh. As the IQ of the D800 is certainly better than 5d3. A photographer friend who switched from 5d2 to D800 showed me comparisons on his laptop and I cannot any longer defend the IQ of 5d3 vs D800. I do realize 'but but' of autofocus, responsiveness etc but am talking just about IQ.

Complaining about Canon cameras not being "amazing" is like complaining about a Toyota Camry that won't do 180mph, or which doesn't have walnut interiors.  For-profit businesses (like Canon) do not want to make "amazing" products, they want to make amazing profits.

neuroanatomist

  • CR GEEK
  • ************
  • Posts: 15234
    • View Profile
Re: New EOS-1 in 2014 [CR1]
« Reply #38 on: November 20, 2013, 12:19:20 PM »
We need to look at more than 'numbers sold'. For example there are great movies that have not done super business at the box office. But they have been amazing.

How many critically-acclaimed box office flops have sequels?  Ok, there was Tron, but you get my point.  Also, there's a world of difference between selling 'Art' and selling tools. 

...am talking just about IQ.

…IQ at low ISO, you mean.

This is an ostrich act of not facing reality by digging its face in sand. Canon sensor is certainly broke after comparing it with the D800 and Rx1. Like it or not.

The moment you buy a bare silicon sensor from Nikon or Sony, please tell us all about it.  Until that day, keep in mind that people buy cameras, not sensors.  You may not care about anything but the sensor, but the sales figures put you in the minority.  Like it or not. 
EOS 1D X, EOS M, and lots of lenses
______________________________
Flickr | TDP Profile/Gear List

GmwDarkroom

  • Rebel SL1
  • ***
  • Posts: 86
    • View Profile
Re: New EOS-1 in 2014 [CR1]
« Reply #39 on: November 20, 2013, 12:23:34 PM »
DR (at any ISO) is.
DR Kumite begins anew!

Canon Dojo?
Nikon/Sony Dojo?

FIGHT!

Mt Spokane Photography

  • EF 50mm F 0.7 IS
  • ***********
  • Posts: 9411
    • View Profile
Re: New EOS-1 in 2014 [CR1]
« Reply #40 on: November 20, 2013, 12:27:04 PM »
Like I said before. Canon's "Answer" to the Nikon D800 (and future D900, and the Sony A7R) will come as a big bulky elephant sized 1D-body, with a price tag that most people can't touch.

Ok, then...but what are Nikon and Sony's "Answers" to the 5DIII, which has outsold the D800 and will vastly outsell the a7R?   ::)

Why do people think Canon needs to play Nikon's game?  The D800 was Nikon's attempt to play the game by Canon's rules (we'll see your 8-9 MP increase, and raise you by another 14 MP), and Nikon lost.
When someone attacks a Canon body, you always resort to raw sales. That'S not very interesting.

I agree. We need to look at more than 'numbers sold'. For example there are great movies that have not done super business at the box office. But they have been amazing.
To say Nikon 'lost' is perhaps harsh. As the IQ of the D800 is certainly better than 5d3. A photographer friend who switched from 5d2 to D800 showed me comparisons on his laptop and I cannot any longer defend the IQ of 5d3 vs D800. I do realize 'but but' of autofocus, responsiveness etc but am talking just about IQ.

And the companies that mad those great movies went out of business or had to sell to someone else who knew how to run a business.

The point is that in order to stay in business, you have to make a profit.  You can't do that if your product does not sell.  It really has nothing to do with how good the product might be.  One example that us old people remember is the Sony Beta Video Tape Recorder, superior to VHS quality wise, but good marketing pushed it out of the market.

I bought a D800 after they first came out, and it is a nice camera body.  It has buttons all over, and a poor menu system that makes it hard to find a function quickly, but that's a minor thing.  I also purchased 10K of high end lenses.  That's where I made the error, they were good, but the CA on the 24070 f/2.8G was so high that Lightroom could not remove it at the edges.  Then, I read the reviews from testers and found that this was normal.  Even though my Canon 24-105 has a lot of distortion, Lightroom quickly removes it.

The other issue was the amount of computing power it took to process the large files from high ISO shots, usually 50mb compressed and over 100MB when uncompressed.  Running NR on those3 took forever, and, since I take up to 1500 shots at some low light events, it was a non starter to have to spend hundreds of hours editing them.  I've tried again after replacing my computer last fall with the latest, and it cut the time down, but its no fun to sit there for 4 times as long.

neuroanatomist

  • CR GEEK
  • ************
  • Posts: 15234
    • View Profile
Re: New EOS-1 in 2014 [CR1]
« Reply #41 on: November 20, 2013, 12:29:16 PM »
Complaining about Canon cameras not being "amazing" is like complaining about a Toyota Camry that won't do 180mph, or which doesn't have walnut interiors.  For-profit businesses (like Canon) do not want to make "amazing" products, they want to make amazing profits.

Jaguar makes cars that go 180 mph and have walnut interiors.  What Jaguar doesn't make is a profit.  :P
EOS 1D X, EOS M, and lots of lenses
______________________________
Flickr | TDP Profile/Gear List

Eldar

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1763
    • View Profile
    • Flickr
Re: New EOS-1 in 2014 [CR1]
« Reply #42 on: November 20, 2013, 12:32:27 PM »
DR (at any ISO) is.
DR Kumite begins anew!

Canon Dojo?
Nikon/Sony Dojo?

FIGHT!
Having spent most of my athletic career in martial art, I like your metaphor ;)

But I don´t see this as bringing "that" fight to the surface any more than stating that I would actually be happier buying a new 5DIV or 1DXI (or what they will call´em) if the massive improvement came in DR. I have previously stated that I want more resolution. I have the new Zeiss 55/1.4 ordered to confirm that. But I had a serious look through some raw-files the other day and I came to the conclusion that I´d rather have a 24MP sensor with significant DR improvement, than a 45MP sensor with the same DR.
PS! If I could buy both, I probably would ;)
5DIII, 1DX, 8-15/4L, 16-35 f4L IS, 24-70/2.8L II, 70-200/2.8L IS II, 70-300/4-5.6L IS, 200-400/4L IS 1.4x, Zeiss 15/2.8, 17/4L TS-E, Zeiss 21/2.8, 24/3.5L TS-E II, Zeiss 35/1.4, Zeiss Otus 55/1.4, Zeiss Otus 85/1.4, 100/2.8L IS Macro, Zeiss 135/2, 600/4L IS II

canon rumors FORUM

Re: New EOS-1 in 2014 [CR1]
« Reply #42 on: November 20, 2013, 12:32:27 PM »

J.R.

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1525
    • View Profile
Re: New EOS-1 in 2014 [CR1]
« Reply #43 on: November 20, 2013, 12:34:06 PM »
Complaining about Canon cameras not being "amazing" is like complaining about a Toyota Camry that won't do 180mph, or which doesn't have walnut interiors.  For-profit businesses (like Canon) do not want to make "amazing" products, they want to make amazing profits.

Jaguar makes cars that go 180 mph and have walnut interiors.  What Jaguar doesn't make is a profit.  :P

Jaguar Land Rover made a profit of over £1bn in the first half this year.
1DX, 5D3, 600D, RX100
16-35L, 24-70L II, 70-200L II, 100-400L, 50L, 85L II, 135L, 24TSE, 40, 100 macro, 18-55 II, 55-250 II, 1.4x III, 2x III, 600RT x 4
The grass is always greener when you crank up the saturation in photoshop

Eldar

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1763
    • View Profile
    • Flickr
Re: New EOS-1 in 2014 [CR1]
« Reply #44 on: November 20, 2013, 12:37:39 PM »
Jaguar Land Rover made a profit of over £1bn in the first half this year.
He he, I waited for that ;)

PS! I´m in a Lufthansa lounge in Munich with a long stop-over and nothing better to do than write meaningless posts on CR. Please continue ;)
5DIII, 1DX, 8-15/4L, 16-35 f4L IS, 24-70/2.8L II, 70-200/2.8L IS II, 70-300/4-5.6L IS, 200-400/4L IS 1.4x, Zeiss 15/2.8, 17/4L TS-E, Zeiss 21/2.8, 24/3.5L TS-E II, Zeiss 35/1.4, Zeiss Otus 55/1.4, Zeiss Otus 85/1.4, 100/2.8L IS Macro, Zeiss 135/2, 600/4L IS II

canon rumors FORUM

Re: New EOS-1 in 2014 [CR1]
« Reply #44 on: November 20, 2013, 12:37:39 PM »