May 23, 2013, 02:36:34 AM

Author Topic: Canon EF 100-400mmL IS  (Read 5557 times)

JTPAIN

  • Guest
Canon EF 100-400mmL IS
« on: January 29, 2012, 12:31:42 PM »
Hey,

Does anyone know if Canon will be replacing their old 100-400mmL lens any time soon? - I know some have said that the 70-300mmL is a replacement, because of crop body users, But for birding, that extra length is pretty vital. I've heard mixed revues of the 70-300mm with 1.4x tele, and think it would probably be too much of a compromise to loose AF.

Many thanks

canon rumors FORUM

Canon EF 100-400mmL IS
« on: January 29, 2012, 12:31:42 PM »

neuroanatomist

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 8642
    • View Profile
Re: Canon EF 100-400mmL IS
« Reply #1 on: January 29, 2012, 01:35:35 PM »
There have been rumors of a new 100-400mm for several years. So far, there have been two patents published (about a year apart, IIRC).  Still no new lens.

I'd skip the TC on a 70-300L; won't work at all with a Canon TC, and the optical quality of the 3rd party TCs isn't as good.

Personally, I'd like a 400/5.6L IS, wouldn't mind a new 100-400mm, but I'm quite happy with my 100-400mm now.
EOS 1D X, EOS 7D, and lots of lenses
_____________________________
Flickr | TDP Profile/Gear List

candyman

  • 6D
  • *****
  • Posts: 502
  • 7D wBG
    • View Profile
Re: Canon EF 100-400mmL IS
« Reply #2 on: January 29, 2012, 01:55:02 PM »
I thought the replacement was the 200-400mm?
Maybe I got it wrong?


Here
« Last Edit: January 29, 2012, 02:00:53 PM by candyman »
5D III wBG

photophreek

  • Guest
Re: Canon EF 100-400mmL IS
« Reply #3 on: January 29, 2012, 02:07:27 PM »
The 200-400mm is a different lens and belongs in the super tele group.  I really don't think it's a replacement for the 100-400mm given it's anticipated weight and cost.

Canon-F1

  • 5D Mark III
  • ******
  • Posts: 687
    • View Profile
Re: Canon EF 100-400mmL IS
« Reply #4 on: January 29, 2012, 02:15:01 PM »
im waiting too...

either for a new 400mm f5.6 with IS or a new 100-400mm.

i really don´t like the current 100-400 and it´s push/pull design.
my father has one and it´s by far the lens that attracts the most dirt.
6D, 5D MK2, 7D, 550D... a lot of Glass.

mb66energy

  • Rebel T4i
  • ****
  • Posts: 191
  • It's the light ...
    • View Profile
Re: Canon EF 100-400mmL IS
« Reply #5 on: January 29, 2012, 03:14:33 PM »
im waiting too...

either for a new 400mm f5.6 with IS or a new 100-400mm.

i really don´t like the current 100-400 and it´s push/pull design.
my father has one and it´s by far the lens that attracts the most dirt.

I have stopped to wait and decidetd to get a 400mm f5.6 NON-IS, because
the 100-400 air pump should be addicted to dust - as you wrote.
Another reason is that the old 400 mm prime has just 6 lens elements and
should show less flare than a zoom with 14 (!) lens groups.

Another reason to buy the old 400mm is that I don't want to pay twice
the money for an IS version which has - maybe - 12 or 15 lens elements too.
In germany only a few dealers have listed the 5.6 400 and I hate to be too
late - after many frustrating decisions!

I observed that classic lenses are perhaps not as sharp as modern zooms (and
IS lenses) but have better contrast and render the object with higher fidelity. So
the percepted authenticity of photographs is better than that of the zooms.

My first impressions with that lens: very sharp, very contrasty, easy for hand-holding,
absolutely sturdy design (one metal tube enclosing/supporting the movable parts) and
a big advantage: the built-in hood with rubberized rim to take some rough bumps (I do
not plan them but they might happen).
TOOLS: EF-S 10-22 | 60 || EF 2.8/24 | 2.8/40 | 2.8+2.0/100 | 4.0/70-200 | 5.6/400 || 2 x 40D || 2x TC ||| 600D for video

Mt Spokane Photography

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 5828
    • View Profile
Re: Canon EF 100-400mmL IS
« Reply #6 on: January 29, 2012, 04:04:32 PM »
The rumor has sporadically appeared for at least five years.  Don't wait, the existing one is a super value for the price.  Any better one will cost a lot more.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Canon EF 100-400mmL IS
« Reply #6 on: January 29, 2012, 04:04:32 PM »

neuroanatomist

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 8642
    • View Profile
Re: Canon EF 100-400mmL IS
« Reply #7 on: January 29, 2012, 04:58:20 PM »
The 400/5.6 is only 20% less than the 100-400 here in the US. FWIW, I don't have a speck of dust in mine - FYI, the 100-400 has weather seals at the switches and zoom extension/focus ring, i.e. it lacks the mount gasket but is otherwise a sealed lens (it's cousin the 28-300L has the mount gasket and is billed as 'weather sealed').
EOS 1D X, EOS 7D, and lots of lenses
_____________________________
Flickr | TDP Profile/Gear List

vlim

  • Rebel T4i
  • ****
  • Posts: 160
  • www.eco-tico-explorer.com
    • View Profile
    • Eco Tico Explorer
Re: Canon EF 100-400mmL IS
« Reply #8 on: January 29, 2012, 05:09:55 PM »
Quote
Personally, I'd like a 400/5.6L IS

Ho yes ! or finally a 300 f/4 L IS II

Both weather sealed of course and under 1800$

smirkypants

  • Guest
Re: Canon EF 100-400mmL IS
« Reply #9 on: January 29, 2012, 05:44:21 PM »
The whole dust issue in the 100-400mm is an urban legend. I use mine on polo fields with horses flying by all the time and I have never, ever had a problem with dust. EVER. Somewhere, somebody decided that the push-pull system just HAD to attract dust, the idea caught on and it's attained a life of it's own. It's crap. It's not a problem. It never was a problem.

Now image quality... that's hit or miss. And the autofocus is slow. I don't love this lens, but it's serviceable.

neuroanatomist

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 8642
    • View Profile
Re: Canon EF 100-400mmL IS
« Reply #10 on: January 29, 2012, 05:55:27 PM »
The whole dust issue in the 100-400mm is an urban legend.

+1. But, of course, the 17-55mm does have a dust problem.  Mine doesn't, but they all do.  So sayeth the Internet.   ::)
EOS 1D X, EOS 7D, and lots of lenses
_____________________________
Flickr | TDP Profile/Gear List

wickidwombat

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 3621
    • View Profile
Re: Canon EF 100-400mmL IS
« Reply #11 on: January 29, 2012, 05:59:26 PM »
The whole dust issue in the 100-400mm is an urban legend. I use mine on polo fields with horses flying by all the time and I have never, ever had a problem with dust. EVER. Somewhere, somebody decided that the push-pull system just HAD to attract dust, the idea caught on and it's attained a life of it's own. It's crap. It's not a problem. It never was a problem.

Now image quality... that's hit or miss. And the autofocus is slow. I don't love this lens, but it's serviceable.

ditto for the dust on the 28-300 never had a problem with it, once ou get the hang of the push pull zoom its very fast I found the AF speed on the 28-300 very quick, maybe not as quick as the 70-200 f2.8 but not too far off the mark, but As far as I know the 28-300 is rated as weather sealed where as the 100-400 is not "weather sealed"
APS-H Fanboy

pranav

  • Guest
Re: Canon EF 100-400mmL IS
« Reply #12 on: January 29, 2012, 06:15:21 PM »
The whole dust issue in the 100-400mm is an urban legend.

+1. But, of course, the 17-55mm does have a dust problem.  Mine doesn't, but they all do.  So sayeth the Internet.   ::)
I am sure some of it is "Canon Rumor", but you can't make those sweeping statements unless you were in Boston/NY (or similar low dust places). Your answers would be more cautious if you were living in southwest. I dont have dust in/on my lenses as I am super careful but it does take my energy and time. When I use to live on Long Island, dust was not something I ever thought much about. 

smirkypants

  • Guest
Re: Canon EF 100-400mmL IS
« Reply #13 on: January 30, 2012, 05:17:43 AM »
Your answers would be more cautious if you were living in southwest.
Obviously I need to show you the extent of dust that I deal with on Argentine polo fields. When there has been rain and the fields are well attended, it's not bad. When it's dry, I am often taking photos literally in swirls of dust.

Dust pump = urban legend, pure and simple.

Canon-F1

  • 5D Mark III
  • ******
  • Posts: 687
    • View Profile
Re: Canon EF 100-400mmL IS
« Reply #14 on: January 30, 2012, 06:32:35 AM »
Please do not accuse me of "talking BS." 

oh but you can say other tell lies and making things up?  ::)


6D, 5D MK2, 7D, 550D... a lot of Glass.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Canon EF 100-400mmL IS
« Reply #14 on: January 30, 2012, 06:32:35 AM »