December 11, 2017, 04:44:01 AM

Author Topic: Any reviews or impressions of the EF-M 18-150mm yet?  (Read 36860 times)

JPAZ

  • EOS 5DS R
  • ******
  • Posts: 832
  • If only I knew what I was doing.....
Re: Any reviews or impressions of the EF-M 18-150mm yet?
« Reply #60 on: March 05, 2017, 03:23:45 PM »
So the EF-M 55-250 just arrived.  A little "bigger" than I had thought (just my impression because it is very small compared to a my EF 100-400) but is lightweight and seems to work fine (weather keeps me indoors right now).  So now my M lineup is the 11-22, 22, 18-55 and 55-200.  I also have an adapter that works sweetly with the 40mm pankake. 

So I have done it.  I've made my "small kit" bigger.  This arguement alone could favor the 18-150.  Now I'll need to get bigger bag for my mirrorless kit  ??? !
5d Mkiii; Eos-M5 and too many lenses; 430 EXii, 430 EXiii-RT and a whole lot of stuff.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Any reviews or impressions of the EF-M 18-150mm yet?
« Reply #60 on: March 05, 2017, 03:23:45 PM »

slclick

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • ********
  • Posts: 2098
Re: Any reviews or impressions of the EF-M 18-150mm yet?
« Reply #61 on: March 05, 2017, 03:43:42 PM »
Boy, I have run this equation over in my head a thousand times, mostly from the angle of using my EF lenses on a Canon ML body for the desire to enjoy new tech, a smaller set of gear and having a second body (for the first time in a couple years) which would be great for particular travel situations  less conspicuous, lighter and a nice change.

I have come down to two choices, waiting for something else to come out of Canon or perhaps picking up a unique fixed lens camera such as the Fujifilm X100F or a Sigma Quattro variety.

Trouble is, there are none of either locally for me to test out. This was how I completely ruled out the M5 after getting linked with a better than Street Price from Gordon for being a regular. I went to the only shop in town and after 2 minutes holding one,  I moved on.

Crazy.

yakman

  • PowerShot G1 X II
  • ***
  • Posts: 34
    • Vincent's ArteCafe
Re: Any reviews or impressions of the EF-M 18-150mm yet?
« Reply #62 on: March 08, 2017, 11:55:48 PM »
Back to the topic, how does the 18-150 compare to 18-55, particular in the 22 to 55 range?
Already own 11-22, 18-55, 22. and other EF lens including 70-200 F4L IS

Thinking whether to get the 18-150 in a kit or just the M5 body.
EOS 5D 70D 18-55 STM IS/ 24-105F4L IS 40 F2.8/50 F1.4 ART/50 F1.8 STM/ 85 1.8/ 70-200 F4L IS/ 580EX II
EOS M M5 11-22 STM IS/ 18-55 STM IS/ 22 F2/  90EX/ EF EOS-M adaptor
https://LiangVincentWang.com/

HaroldC3

  • EOS Rebel SL2
  • ***
  • Posts: 84
Re: Any reviews or impressions of the EF-M 18-150mm yet?
« Reply #63 on: March 10, 2017, 08:10:07 AM »
There's no incentive to get it in a kit unless you can get some special deal.  Personally, I'm waiting for it to get to around $300.  Hopefully an import model will get there soon as they are already at $380.

sunnyVan

  • EOS 7D Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 573
Re: Any reviews or impressions of the EF-M 18-150mm yet?
« Reply #64 on: March 10, 2017, 09:14:21 AM »
I've been using 18-150 for almost three months. In my view it's better than 18-55. I carry m5 + 18-150 + 11-22 wherever I go. Extremely convenient.

You should buy it through canonpricewatch Street Price program. You can get m5+ 18-150 kit for $1300.

Back to the topic, how does the 18-150 compare to 18-55, particular in the 22 to 55 range?
Already own 11-22, 18-55, 22. and other EF lens including 70-200 F4L IS

Thinking whether to get the 18-150 in a kit or just the M5 body.
24-70 2.8L II, 16-35 F4L IS, 135L,  600EX-RT, 430EX RT, EOS M IR converted, efm 11-22, Fuji X-T2, Fujinon 35 F2, Fujinon 16 1.4, Fujinon 90 F2, Fujinon 56 1.2, Fujinon 50-140 2.8, Fujinon 100-400

rrcphoto

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • ********
  • Posts: 2032
Re: Any reviews or impressions of the EF-M 18-150mm yet?
« Reply #65 on: May 04, 2017, 07:26:43 PM »
I'm totally necro'ing this thread.

I have extensively used every EF-M lens there is.

this is a lens that if you don't mind lens corrections, especially CA and PF, run.  don't walk.  don't delay.  Run. and get this lens.  I gave away my 15-45, 18-55 and 55-200 after using this lens.

it's a little front heavy on the M5 and M3 but not that bad as an EF lens.

however it's a .31x macro, and is absolutely brilliant through the zoom range.

if you don't correct for CA, it'll look soft, but once you do you'll be more than happy with results.


Act444

  • EOS 5DS R
  • ******
  • Posts: 776
Re: Any reviews or impressions of the EF-M 18-150mm yet?
« Reply #66 on: May 05, 2017, 11:49:29 AM »
Back to the topic, how does the 18-150 compare to 18-55, particular in the 22 to 55 range?
Already own 11-22, 18-55, 22. and other EF lens including 70-200 F4L IS

I'd say favorably, at least in the center and mid-frame. Honestly I no longer have the 18-55, and would see little need in having both the 18-55 and 18-150. The 15-45 is at least smaller and 3mm wider so that's what I use when I need a small zoom. Although I think now, the 11-22 and 18-150 will get more use generally.

For me, it can't quite replace the 55-200 - the latter is still a tad better - and brighter - at the far end when I need ONLY telephoto coverage. Remember the 18-150 hits f6.3 at around 65mm while the 55-200 does not hit that until past 150mm

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Any reviews or impressions of the EF-M 18-150mm yet?
« Reply #66 on: May 05, 2017, 11:49:29 AM »

bholliman

  • EOS 5DS R
  • ******
  • Posts: 1426
    • [color=blue]Flick[/color][color=red]r[/color]
Re: Any reviews or impressions of the EF-M 18-150mm yet?
« Reply #67 on: May 07, 2017, 09:04:28 AM »
Back to the topic, how does the 18-150 compare to 18-55, particular in the 22 to 55 range?
Already own 11-22, 18-55, 22. and other EF lens including 70-200 F4L IS

I'd say favorably, at least in the center and mid-frame. Honestly I no longer have the 18-55, and would see little need in having both the 18-55 and 18-150. The 15-45 is at least smaller and 3mm wider so that's what I use when I need a small zoom. Although I think now, the 11-22 and 18-150 will get more use generally.

For me, it can't quite replace the 55-200 - the latter is still a tad better - and brighter - at the far end when I need ONLY telephoto coverage. Remember the 18-150 hits f6.3 at around 65mm while the 55-200 does not hit that until past 150mm

I have either owned or currently own all the EF-M lenses except the 28mm macro.  After some extensive use, I'm going to sell my 15-45 and 55-200 and roll with the following 3-lens set-up:  22 f/2, 11-22 and 18-150.  I recently added the 11-22 and have loved it for landscapes and indoor scenes.  The 18-150 is surprisingly sharp for a superzoom, maybe not quite as good as the 55-200 (and a little slower as Act444 pointed out), but I can live with this compromise to have a single lens that covers such a wide range.  If I need more reach, I can use my EF lenses with the adapter.

The 15-45 is the only EF-M lens that I've been somewhat disappointed with.  It is very compact, but not very sharp.
5DsR, EF Lenses: 35mm f/2IS, 300mm f/2.8L II IS, 16-35mm f/4L IS, 24-70mm f/2.8LII, 70-200mm f/2.8LIS II, 100-400mm II
M5, M series lenses: Rokinon 12mm f/2, EF-M 22mm f/2, 18-150mm
https://www.flickr.com/photos/68928679@N05

Zv

  • EOS-1D X Mark II
  • *******
  • Posts: 1765
    • Zeeography (flickr)
Re: Any reviews or impressions of the EF-M 18-150mm yet?
« Reply #68 on: May 07, 2017, 10:11:54 AM »
Sorry, bit late to the game but that review of the M5 everyone is referring to is terrible. Guy doesn't know what he's talking about. All M cameras are well built. What kind of talk is that anyway? "Oh yeah image quality is great just like any Canon DSLR but ..." but what? Shut up. Ugggh couldn't even read further than that.

Anyway, I'm liking what I hear about the 18-150mm and this will likely be my next purchase either with or without the M6. (Just hope it doesn't fall apart in my hands suddenly you know, because the build quality is sooooo terrible right?)
Move along nothing to see here!

AvTvM

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • ********
  • Posts: 2940
Re: Any reviews or impressions of the EF-M 18-150mm yet?
« Reply #69 on: May 07, 2017, 12:34:10 PM »
thx for all the input on 18-150. still undecided re. my future EF-M lens park. Got 11-22 and 22 will definitely keep. Also got 18-55 which I like for compact size and decent IQ. Also have 55-200 but rarely use. :-) 

Tried it last week ... M5 with 18-150 attached will not fit Lowepro Dashpoint 30. Those pouches can be attached not only horizontally (to belt) but also *vertically* - e.g. up front on backpack strap, which is my favorite carrying solution in the mountains and on many city trips. Have already asked LowePro if they could possibly *pretty please* add a slightly larger Dashpoint 40 to their lineup. They did respond, but not with a resounding YES yet ... :-) 

dak723

  • EOS 5D Mark IV
  • ******
  • Posts: 634
Re: Any reviews or impressions of the EF-M 18-150mm yet?
« Reply #70 on: May 07, 2017, 01:51:54 PM »
thx for all the input on 18-150. still undecided re. my future EF-M lens park. Got 11-22 and 22 will definitely keep. Also got 18-55 which I like for compact size and decent IQ. Also have 55-200 but rarely use. :-) 

Tried it last week ... M5 with 18-150 attached will not fit Lowepro Dashpoint 30. Those pouches can be attached not only horizontally (to belt) but also *vertically* - e.g. up front on backpack strap, which is my favorite carrying solution in the mountains and on many city trips. Have already asked LowePro if they could possibly *pretty please* add a slightly larger Dashpoint 40 to their lineup. They did respond, but not with a resounding YES yet ... :-)

I guess the obvious comment would be - how often do you feel you need more reach than the 18-55 gives you?  Since you rarely use the 55-200, my guess would be not often enough to get the 18-150.  In my case, I have been using the 18-150 and the 18-55 has been put away and not used since due to the convenience of the wide range on the 18-150. Haven't done a close comparison, but the 18-150 seems similar in IQ to the 18-55 within their same ranges.

rrcphoto

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • ********
  • Posts: 2032
Re: Any reviews or impressions of the EF-M 18-150mm yet?
« Reply #71 on: May 07, 2017, 02:13:22 PM »
Back to the topic, how does the 18-150 compare to 18-55, particular in the 22 to 55 range?
Already own 11-22, 18-55, 22. and other EF lens including 70-200 F4L IS

I'd say favorably, at least in the center and mid-frame. Honestly I no longer have the 18-55, and would see little need in having both the 18-55 and 18-150. The 15-45 is at least smaller and 3mm wider so that's what I use when I need a small zoom. Although I think now, the 11-22 and 18-150 will get more use generally.

For me, it can't quite replace the 55-200 - the latter is still a tad better - and brighter - at the far end when I need ONLY telephoto coverage. Remember the 18-150 hits f6.3 at around 65mm while the 55-200 does not hit that until past 150mm

I have either owned or currently own all the EF-M lenses except the 28mm macro.  After some extensive use, I'm going to sell my 15-45 and 55-200 and roll with the following 3-lens set-up:  22 f/2, 11-22 and 18-150.  I recently added the 11-22 and have loved it for landscapes and indoor scenes.  The 18-150 is surprisingly sharp for a superzoom, maybe not quite as good as the 55-200 (and a little slower as Act444 pointed out), but I can live with this compromise to have a single lens that covers such a wide range.  If I need more reach, I can use my EF lenses with the adapter.

The 15-45 is the only EF-M lens that I've been somewhat disappointed with.  It is very compact, but not very sharp.

the 18-150mm more than the 55-200 needs good lens corrections after that, the sharpness should be pretty comparable if not more favourable with the 18-150mm.  DLO does a bang up job on the 18-150mm sans not strong enough PF.

bholliman

  • EOS 5DS R
  • ******
  • Posts: 1426
    • [color=blue]Flick[/color][color=red]r[/color]
Re: Any reviews or impressions of the EF-M 18-150mm yet?
« Reply #72 on: May 09, 2017, 11:40:50 AM »
The Digital Picture has added the EF-M 18-150mm to their lens image quality comparison tool - and they look really bad.  I recently purchased a 18-150 and now have all the EF-M lenses except for the 28mm Macro.  My copy of the 18-150 is much better than the TDP copy.  Mine is comparable in sharpness to the 18-55 and 55-200 and better than my 15-45.

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=1134&Camera=812&Sample=0&FLI=0&API=0&LensComp=1114&CameraComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=0
5DsR, EF Lenses: 35mm f/2IS, 300mm f/2.8L II IS, 16-35mm f/4L IS, 24-70mm f/2.8LII, 70-200mm f/2.8LIS II, 100-400mm II
M5, M series lenses: Rokinon 12mm f/2, EF-M 22mm f/2, 18-150mm
https://www.flickr.com/photos/68928679@N05

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Any reviews or impressions of the EF-M 18-150mm yet?
« Reply #72 on: May 09, 2017, 11:40:50 AM »

TWI by Dustin Abbott

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • ********
  • Posts: 2614
    • dustinabbott.net
Re: Any reviews or impressions of the EF-M 18-150mm yet?
« Reply #73 on: May 09, 2017, 12:01:47 PM »
The Digital Picture has added the EF-M 18-150mm to their lens image quality comparison tool - and they look really bad.  I recently purchased a 18-150 and now have all the EF-M lenses except for the 28mm Macro.  My copy of the 18-150 is much better than the TDP copy.  Mine is comparable in sharpness to the 18-55 and 55-200 and better than my 15-45.

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=1134&Camera=812&Sample=0&FLI=0&API=0&LensComp=1114&CameraComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=0

I was surprised by that, too.  The copy I used in my M5 reviews was pretty excellent, all things considered.
6D x 2 | 80D | 70D | EOS-M3 w/22mm f/2 + 18-55 STM + 55-200 STM + Rokinon 12MM F/2 + EF Adapter| Tamron 15-30 VC | EF-S 24mm f/2.8 | Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 VC | 35mm f/2 IS | 40mm f/2.8 | Tamron 45mm VC | Zeiss 50 | 50 STM | 100L | 135L | Tamron 70-200 VC | 100-400L II | Legacy Glass

Random Orbits

  • EOS-1D X Mark II
  • *******
  • Posts: 1957
Re: Any reviews or impressions of the EF-M 18-150mm yet?
« Reply #74 on: May 09, 2017, 12:54:35 PM »
The Digital Picture has added the EF-M 18-150mm to their lens image quality comparison tool - and they look really bad.  I recently purchased a 18-150 and now have all the EF-M lenses except for the 28mm Macro.  My copy of the 18-150 is much better than the TDP copy.  Mine is comparable in sharpness to the 18-55 and 55-200 and better than my 15-45.

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=1134&Camera=812&Sample=0&FLI=0&API=0&LensComp=1114&CameraComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=0

I was surprised by that, too.  The copy I used in my M5 reviews was pretty excellent, all things considered.

On TDP's announcement of the availability of IQ chart data was the following blurb.

Quote
The focal length range in this compact lens is awesome. The image sharpness is ... well, I'll let you decide.
 
The evaluation lens came in the Canon EOS M6 retail kit we tested. After consulting with Roger at Lensrentals.com, I'm led to believe that this copy of the 18-150 may be somewhat underperforming at the wide end, but the results from the long end appear normal. While it is hard to argue with the convenience factor of this lens, those looking for ultimate image sharpness will likely not find what they are looking for from any copy of this model.

So it looks like a subpar unit, but might still be representative at the long end?  Hopefully, they'll get another sample to evaluate...

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Any reviews or impressions of the EF-M 18-150mm yet?
« Reply #74 on: May 09, 2017, 12:54:35 PM »