January 17, 2018, 01:39:17 PM

Author Topic: UPDATED: Canon Italy Posts Image With Stolen Elements, No Credit and Taken on a Fuji  (Read 1120 times)

Canon Rumors

  • Administrator
  • Canon EF 600mm f/4L IS II
  • *****
  • Posts: 6090
    • Canon Rumors
*UPDATE*

DPReview has updated the story to shed some more light on what exactly happened at Canon with this image.

We spoke to Elia this morning, and he told us that after a bit of sleuthing he was actually able to uncover the source of the image: a royalty free photograph on Unsplash that was allegedly taken in October of 2017 with a Canon 1D Mark IV. Elia has asked that we not “out” the photographer, but you can see the EXIF data in this screenshot:

Screenshot by DPReview

From there, it doesn’t take an advanced degree to figure out what happened. A social media team at Canon Europe took to Unsplash to find a royalty free picture to share. They probably searched for “Canon 1D Mark IV” and “Italy,” and when they stumbled across this shot they had no idea that it was, in fact, not a single image but a composite of (at least) two photos… one of which was taken with a Fujifilm camera. Read the full story at DPReview

It’s strange to me that Canon would be this lazy in posting images. I find it hard to believe they don’t have a library of countless great images they could use for social media.


Well this is an odd one. According to FStoppers Canon Italy has posted an image to social media without credit, consisting of stolen elements and not even taken on a Canon camera.

It looks like someone at Canon took the work of landscape photographer Elia Locardi and used some elements from the image in a composite on an image Canon Italy posted to Instagram and Facebook.

From FStoppers:

So, the social media team for Canon Italy (and Spain) have posted a composite landscape, half of which was stolen, not taken with a Canon, and not credited anyone involved in the creation of this image. Rough day at the office.

Social media is full of brands stealing photos, not crediting authors, not expecting to pay for using someone elses photos. However, to see someone at a company like Canon do it, that seems even worse.

Head on over to FStoppers for a more in-depth analysis of the offending image.

image credit // FStoppers.com

« Last Edit: January 11, 2018, 02:07:20 PM by Canon Rumors »
canonrumors.com

canon rumors FORUM


rrcphoto

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • ********
  • Posts: 2076
to be fair.

what it says in dpreview was that the stock site that canon got it from had the image labelled as taken with a canon 1D Mark IV.

https://www.dpreview.com/news/6711879670/canon-accidentally-shared-a-composite-photo-shot-with-a-fuji-all-over-social-media

LDS

  • EOS 5DS R
  • ******
  • Posts: 1109
to be fair.

what it says in dpreview was that the stock site that canon got it from had the image labelled as taken with a canon 1D Mark IV.

https://www.dpreview.com/news/6711879670/canon-accidentally-shared-a-composite-photo-shot-with-a-fuji-all-over-social-media

What's interesting is Canon doesn't have its own image library to get images from... or some of its marketing people are too lazy and greed to get images from proper sources.

Frage

  • EOS Rebel SL2
  • ***
  • Posts: 89
I mostly have the feeling Fstoppers is a clickbait factory.

aceflibble

  • EOS M5
  • ****
  • Posts: 207
What's interesting is Canon doesn't have its own image library to get images from... or some of its marketing people are too lazy and greed to get images from proper sources.
Using stock assets is completely standard, especially for branches of a company away from the main offices. Canon have done it for years. So do Nikon, Sony, Fuji, Panasonic, Pentax, etc.

neuroanatomist

  • CR GEEK
  • ************
  • Posts: 21984
EOS 1D X, EOS M2, lots of lenses
______________________________
Flickr | TDP Profile/Gear List

LDS

  • EOS 5DS R
  • ******
  • Posts: 1109
Using stock assets is completely standard, especially for branches of a company away from the main offices. Canon have done it for years. So do Nikon, Sony, Fuji, Panasonic, Pentax, etc.

Sure - but use reputable sources, at least, even if they're not free...

canon rumors FORUM