Image & Video Galleries > Lens Gallery

Canon EF 16-35 2.8L

<< < (2/4) > >>

dwward:
more awesome subway photos. 

Is there the DC Metro?

ronderick:
I've actually been eyeing the 16-35mm for a while.

However, are there significant differences between 16-35 I and 16-35 II? II is in stock at most places, but getting a used I would save me some cash...

I'm wandering which has the better bang for the buck?

iris chrome:
Again, great subway picture (just like your other post on the 50mm 1.2L). All the grey and bronze colors from the walls and the tracks seem to mix so nicely with the lights on the wall and from the train car. Love to see more of that set.

RuneL:
Thanks for the kind words!

If you're shooting full frame there may be some reason to get the 16-35 II. I'm shooting on a 1.3 crop at 16mp and I'm not much of a pixel peeper, it works fine for me.
The new one is a bit sharper… I think? Just what someone told me. Has a different filter size, which is, afaik, the only real differences.

If you can get the 16-35 cheap do it. It's an amazing lens.

This is the autonomous metro in Copenhagen :)

ronderick:
Thanks RuneL,

I think I'll go and have a serious look at the 16-35mm I.

If there's only a slight difference in quality, I might as well try to save some money and invest in other gears. You're also right about the filter - the 16-35 I has the 77-filter while the newer version uses the 82. I totally forgot about that...

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page