Canon Has No Plans for a Fixed-Lens Full-Frame Camera

Craig Blair
3 Min Read

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here's how it works.

Last week Sony announced the RX1R III fixed lens full-frame camera to a somewhat of a tepid response. Along with the Leica Q series, Sony and Zeiss are the only manufacturers to produce such a camera, and legend has it that the Zeiss ZX-1 was only made to fight a patent battle with Nikon.

Fujifilm recently launched the GFX100RF, but that camera comes equipped with a medium format sensor. At its price point of about $5000, you could say it's a competitor to both Sony and Leica's offerings.

The Sony RX1R III is full of compromises to reach a more “affordable” price-point such has no IS, a slower lens, much lower resolution EVF, a static rear LCD and no weather sealing cerfication to name a few. These choices were definitely made to keep costs down for Sony, as even they know it won't be a volume product.

Sure, the USD pricing for the RX1R III has been affected by the current tariff issues.

Will Canon Make One?

Canon has never made a fixed lens full-frame camera and they're not going to in the immediate or distant future. While the idea of one is enticing, it's not exactly a volume market. Sure the Leica Q series has done extremely well for Leica, the key part of that is “for Leica”.

Sony does have some history in making such a camera, but they started doing it when they weren't quite where they are in the marketplace at this point in time.

On paper, the Leica Q3 is still the best offering in the segment.

The question has been asked of Canon many times over the years, and the answer has always been “no”. There isn't even the usual “Canon speak” on a topic about a future product.

We have seen Canon walk around the question about a “retro-styled” camera body. Whenever that camera does come, it will not be a fixed-lens full-frame offering.

So while it's a cool idea to talk about, it simply isn't a large enough market for it to be worthwhile for Canon.

I have said in the past that I would love such a camera to come from Canon, but my feelings on that have changed, evolved, whatever you'd like to call it. I am more than happy rolling with an OM-5 for my “small” camera needs at this stage of my photography life.

There will definitely be some fixed-lens PowerShot offerings geared towards photographers coming in the next year or so, but that will be the extent of it all.

Now about that RE-1?

Go to discussion...

Share This Article
Craig is the founder and editorial director for Canon Rumors. He has been writing about all things Canon for more than 17 years. When he's not writing, you can find him shooting professional basketball and travelling the world looking for the next wildlife adventure. The Canon EOS R1 is his camera of choice.

8 comments

  1. I can't see it happening either. The main issue with the RX1R III (apart from the absurd price) is that it isn't actually pocketable and will take up the same space in a bag or on a strap as using an A7CR which is better in all areas while being much cheaper and only marginally larger.

    So if you're Canon you're better off selling an R8 and RF lenses and benefitting from economies of scale and mass market reach, than spending a lot of money on an expensive niche one-off purchase product.

    APS-C is another story. There's already precedent with the G1X III, if they made a modern version with a faster lens I'd preorder it tomorrow.
  2. I can't see it happening either. The main issue with the RX1R III (apart from the absurd price) is that it isn't actually pocketable and will take up the same space in a bag or on a strap as using an A7CR which is better in all areas while being much cheaper and only marginally larger.

    So if you're Canon you're better off selling an R8 and RF lenses and benefitting from economies of scale and mass market reach, than spending a lot of money on an expensive niche one-off purchase product.

    APS-C is another story. There's already precedent with the G1X III, if they made a modern version with a faster lens I'd preorder it tomorrow.
    The RX1R III has one feature that the A7CR lacks: a leaf shutter, which allows for a very high flash sync speed. However, this advantage is largely negated by the existence of the A9 III with its global shutter.
  3. I would love to see Canon make a "bridge camera" like the old Fujifilm HS-series, which went away as mirrorless cameras became more popular. I think that would get a lot of sales, because it would check all the boxes for casual consumers, who don't really want to invest in a camera body and multiple lenses. If they kept the MP below 33 and used an APS-C sensor, it certainly wouldn't threaten their mirrorless cameras.
  4. So if you're Canon you're better off selling an R8 and RF lenses and benefitting from economies of scale and mass market reach, than spending a lot of money on an expensive niche one-off purchase product.
    Imagine how many lenses you could add to R8 with the same budget of the Sony offering 🙂 You'd have a complete set, at least.
  5. Last week Sony announced the RX1R III fixed lens full-frame camera to a somewhat of a tepid response. Along with the Leica Q series, Sony and Zeiss are the only manufacturers to produce such a camera, and legend has it that the Zeiss ZX-1 was only made to fight a patent battle with Nikon. Fujifilm […]

    See full article...
    So thankful for this. It would really be wasting R & D money on something no body wants.
  6. Imagine how many lenses you could add to R8 with the same budget of the Sony offering 🙂 You'd have a complete set, at least.

    Maybe several STM primes but only a couple of STM zooms... or a single fast "L" series lens 😢 $$$

Leave a comment

Please log in to your forum account to comment