Canon Patent Application: Camera with Internal Tilt Movement

Richard Cox
3 Min Read

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here's how it works.

Canon has been exploring quite a bit of methods of doing tilt in a more automated fashion, from having the lens electronically controlled to this patent application (2024-057829) that has the tilt movement controlled inside the camera itself.

Canon in this patent demonstrates a technique that allows them to tilt the sensor while keeping the space required for the mechanism relatively small and compact. According to Canon;

It is an object of the present invention to provide a camera device that can suppress the influence of wiring on sensor tilt drive while suppressing the increase in size of the device.

Will this end up in a camera? To be honest it would be cool for a stills camera to have this. You could then turn any lens you wanted into a tilt lens, and I'm sure the same means could be used for shifting as well. It should be noted that Canon shows this off with a interchangeable lens camera body, but not what appears to be an actual camera. However, it's been done before where Canon shows off a camera as a nondescript box in a patent application.

But before we all await Canon's first large format camera entry – there's a good chance that this is primarily for security and surveillance cameras. The ability to tilt the plane of focus would allow for a much deeper depth of field. For instance, if the security camera was pointing down a sidewalk, it could conceivably get faces in focus from close and far distances away from the camera, even if the lens was quite fast. If you don't use tilt, then you have a much narrower depth of field where faces would be in focus. Not being in focus would dramatically impair facial recognition, etc.

Don't blame me (or Canon) for this – it's just the way the world is going is these days, whether we like it or not.

As with all patent applications, this is a peek into Canon's research. It may never end up in an actual patent or a product.

Japan Patent Application 2024-057829

Go to discussion...

Share This Article
Follow:
Richard has been using Canon cameras since the 1990s, with his first being the now legendary EOS-3. Since then, Richard has continued to use Canon cameras and now focuses mostly on the genre of infrared photography.

6 comments

  1. While I suspect the range of tilt (and shift) within the camera body might be limited compared to a tilt-shift lens, this development is most welcomed for casual architectural shots when travelling in my use case. It would save a lot of stretching using perspective tools in post.
    • 0
  2. The amount of shift available is likely quite small. Many lenses' image circles just barely cover their designed sensors -- the RF 24-240 doesn't even completely cover it! There's simply no room to shift the sensor inside the image circle.

    That said, maybe an APS-C camera could get some shift when used with FF lenses...
    • 0
  3. The amount of shift available is likely quite small. Many lenses' image circles just barely cover their designed sensors -- the RF 24-240 doesn't even completely cover it! There's simply no room to shift the sensor inside the image circle.

    That said, maybe an APS-C camera could get some shift when used with FF lenses...
    The R7 has a feature where it will keep the sensor level when you have the camera at an angle. It has a few, IMO, stupid restrictions like forcing fully mechanical shutter, but it works quite well to combat my pretty consistent 1 degree slant 🙂
    But the R6II and R3 lack that feature, which makes me think it's much harder to do on FF, very likely due to the image circle issue you mention.
    • 0
  4. The amount of shift available is likely quite small. Many lenses' image circles just barely cover their designed sensors -- the RF 24-240 doesn't even completely cover it! There's simply no room to shift the sensor inside the image circle.

    That said, maybe an APS-C camera could get some shift when used with FF lenses...

    yes, APS-C based sensor size would also allow for more shifting.

    but there was no mention of a shift, only tilt.

    I personally would like shift more than tilt if they could do it.
    • 0
  5. While I suspect the range of tilt (and shift) within the camera body might be limited compared to a tilt-shift lens
    IMO shift would be limited by the image circle of the lens. A FF lens and an APS-C body would maybe allow enough shift
    Tilt would be no problem but the angle of view might be smaller.
    I love tilt photography and would love this feature in a camera body.
    • 0
  6. but there was no mention of a shift, only tilt.

    In the patent application, sure. But do you read your own copy?

    CR Post:

    You could then turn any lens you wanted into a tilt lens, and I'm sure the same means could be used for shifting as well.

    emphasis added.
    • 0

Leave a comment

Please log in to your forum account to comment