Canon Patent Application: Low-Cost Ultra Wide RF Zooms

Richard Cox
2 Min Read

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here's how it works.

Canon has always delivered great bang for the buck lenses on top of the fabulous L lenses that we enjoy, so it's no surprise that we see a new patent application dealing with the lower end of the spectrum.

When I first read the patent application (2024-072459), I *assumed* that it was Canon looking at future models of the Canon RF 15-30mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM and the Canon RF 24-50mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM.

But then I took a closer look at the angle of view. The angle of view listed in the embodiments is the 1/2 angle of the diagonal. So in the case of the 14-30mm lens, that's 86.8 degrees on the diagonal, which for 14mm makes this a crop lens or RF-S lens. For the embodiment of the 20-50mm lens, the half angle of view in the embodiment of 46.4 or the full diagonal of 92.8 degrees. This matches up to the full frame angle of view. Canon was a bit sneaky when it came to this patent application. I have never seen them mix crop lenses and full-frame lenses without mentioning the image height which is usually the indicator of a full frame or APS-C lens.

Canon RF-S 14-30mm F4-6.3 STM

           Wide Angle  Medium  Telephoto
Length 14.40 20.07 29.10  
F-number 4.10 5.05 6.40  
angle of view 43.40 31.70 25.10
Lens length 75.06 75.06 75.06  
BF 11.78 11.78 11.78  

Canon RF-S 12-30mm F4-6.3 STM

           Wide Angle  Medium  Telephoto
length 12.40 18.70 29.10  
F-number 4.10 5.13 6.40
Half angle (°) 47.90 34.50 25.20
Lens length 82.67 82.67 82.67  
BF 11.71 11.71 11.71  

Canon RF 20-50mm F4-5.6 STM

           Wide Angle  Medium  Telephoto
length 12.40 18.70 29.10  
Focal length 20.60 31.11 48.50  
F-number 4.10 5.20 5.88
Half angle (°) 46.40 33.20 24.20
Lens length 106.52 106.52 106.52  
BF 19.41 19.41 19.41  

As with all patent applications, this is a glimpse into Canon's ongoing research and may or may not end up in a future product.

Source: Japan Patent Application 2024-072459

Go to discussion...

Share This Article
Follow:
Richard has been using Canon cameras since the 1990s, with his first being the now legendary EOS-3. Since then, Richard has continued to use Canon cameras and now focuses mostly on the genre of infrared photography.

10 comments

  1. There’s not a lot of love for the RF 15-30 for some reason. It’s actually a VERY strong performing ultra wide lens on a budget. It’s a great lens to use for anyone looking to get into shooting real estate on the side to make some money. On the other side of things, the current RF 24-50 that comes with the R8 kit…is trash. LOL jk but It’s not very good.
  2. … the RF 15-30 … a VERY strong performing ultra wide …
    RF 24-50 … not very good.
    Thanks for that opinion.
    Maybe I should look closer at the 15-30, even though I‘m not really good at UWA composition 😉
  3. Even though I appreciate small zoom for travel at the cost of apperture and/or Range and/or IQ I Don’t feel really tempted By these patents and potetial products.
    I really like the 24-50 for traveling, but now I find the 28mm pancake much more useful.
    I wish for a 24-70 f/4!
  4. I really like the 24-50 for traveling, but now I find the 28mm pancake much more useful.
    I wish for a 24-70 f/4!
    I already have the 28, so I know what you mean and what it Can deliver.
  5. There’s not a lot of love for the RF 15-30 for some reason. It’s actually a VERY strong performing ultra wide lens on a budget. It’s a great lens to use for anyone looking to get into shooting real estate on the side to make some money. On the other side of things, the current RF 24-50 that comes with the R8 kit…is trash. LOL jk but It’s not very good.
    ...I've posted variations of what follows several times on CR:

    Any of the later M's (but especially the M6MkII), when attached to the EF-M 11-22...served (and still serves) as an essential travel tool. Its combination of volume, mass and capabilities remains unsurpassed.

    With an EF-M 18-150 on my belt, I'm all set.

    I remain flabbergasted...
  6. Any of the later M's (but especially the M6MkII), when attached to the EF-M 11-22...served (and still serves) as an essential travel tool. Its combination of volume, mass and capabilities remains unsurpassed.

    With an EF-M 18-150 on my belt, I'm all set.
    Agreed. The M6II, M11-22 and M18-150 are an excellent travel kit. When I'm taking my R8-based kit, it's little overhead to bring along my full spectrum M6 and those two lenses.
  7. There’s not a lot of love for the RF 15-30 for some reason. It’s actually a VERY strong performing ultra wide lens on a budget. It’s a great lens to use for anyone looking to get into shooting real estate on the side to make some money. On the other side of things, the current RF 24-50 that comes with the R8 kit…is trash. LOL jk but It’s not very good.
    15-30 wasn't competitive until the price dropped. 24-50 isn't that bad considering the price.
  8. 15-30 wasn't competitive until the price dropped. 24-50 isn't that bad considering the price.
    Not sure I can agree with you on this. There is literally no competition from any manufacturer that makes a sub $800 full-frame ultra-wide zoom with autofocus. The Canon 15-30 stands alone in this segment and now even more distant with the price cut down to $450 when its closest direct competitor costs hundreds more. That makes the RF mount very desirable for real estate photography…full-frame real estate photography, that is.

Leave a comment

Please log in to your forum account to comment