Canon RF 14-28mm f/2.8L IS USM Z Up Next?

Craig Blair
3 Min Read

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here's how it works.

Unlike 2024, it looks like Canon is going to be announcing things in a more spread-out fashion. As you know, most of what Canon announced last year came late in the year. That won't be the case in 2025.

Canon's first round of announcements this year included the PowerShot V1, EOS R50 V, RF-S 14-30mm f/4-6.3 IS STM PZ and RF 20mm f/1.4L VCM, Canon's widest f/1.4 lens ever.

NAB starts in Las Vegas this week, and while it used to be a show that provided a lot of big splashes from the likes of Canon, that hasn't been the case for the last bunch of years. Canon will probably use the show to show off the latest announcements as well as the Cinema EOS C400 and C80.

Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM Z

Canon RF 14-28mm f/2.8L IS USM Z

We have been told that Canon will be announcing a new wide angle Z lens in the near future, though “near future” can be a relative term.

We're told that the lens will be an RF 14-28mm f/2.8L IS USM Z, which will complete the new Z “holy trinity” when matched with the RF 24-105mm f/2,8L IS USM Z and RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM Z. Both of which are brilliant lenses, even if the Power Zoom functionality could use some new zoom motor accessories for a lot less money.

Are there more Z lenses planned?

We haven't heard anything further about full-frame L Z lenses. There probably isn't much point in a Z lens longer than 200mm, as the Power Zoom accessory is designed to be handheld.

We could see the possibility of a slower “super zoom” type of Z lens, but that's nothing more than an opinion at this point.

We do know that we'll see more Power Zoom RF-S lenses in the coming months.

Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8L IS USM Z

Summary

Sure, Canon already has a lot of wide-angle zoom lens offerings, but adding another probably isn't out of the question. Canon has never had a problem with a ton of overlap in their lineup and in the end, we all want choices, don't we?

Go to discussion...

Share This Article
Craig is the founder and editorial director for Canon Rumors. He has been writing about all things Canon for more than 17 years. When he's not writing, you can find him shooting professional basketball and travelling the world looking for the next wildlife adventure. The Canon EOS R1 is his camera of choice.

51 comments

  1. The Z lenses seem to be very important to Canon if they're filling out the trinity line-up that quickly. I hope Canon will complete the F2 trinity (if there was/ is one planed) and a small and compact 24-70mm F4 L would also be very welcomed to fill out the F4 trinity. As I've read/ heard, the RF 24-105mm F4 L isn't really considered being part of a F4 trinity. I not quite sure about that though. On the one hand, for the Z trinity 24-105mm F2.8 seems to have set a new standard and maybe Canon does consider the F4 version of the 24-105mm as part of a F4 trinity. On the other hand, there used to be a EF 24-70mm F4 L in the F4 trinity for EF mount and the 24-105mm is not on par with the 70-200mm and 14-35mm imo. And while we´re at it, a F2.8 non L 70-170mm should be a given I guess.

    Wow, that´d be a lot of trinities (or trinitys? the dictionary said there is no plural form)

    Z-trinity:
    RF 14-28mm F2.8 Z (rumored)
    RF 24-105mm F2.8 Z
    RF 70-200mm F2.8 Z

    F2.8 - L-trinity:
    RF 15-35mm F2.8
    RF 24-70mm F2.8
    RF 70-200mm F2.8

    F4 - L-trinity:
    RF 14-35mm F4
    or RF 10-20mm F4 L
    RF 24-105mm F4 --> does it really count?
    RF 24-70mm F4 --> not available...are there any rumors???
    RF 70-200mm F4

    F2.8 - non L-trinity:
    RF 16-28mm F2.8
    RF 28-70mm F2.8
    RF 70-170mm F2.8 ??? --> rumored lens

    F2 L trinity --> hopefully there will be lenses to complete it
    RF 28-70mm F2
    rumored:
    RF 24-70mm F2
    RF 70-135/ 150mm F2
    RF UWA F2 zoom --> I am guessing it will either end at 28mm or 24mm depending on what Canon does with the successor of the RF 28-70mm F2. I have no idea where it would start.


    Five trinities (plus maybe the extra RF 24-105mm F4) would give us 16-17 great options and we're not even counting the 15-30mm and 24-105mm non L 🙂

    good times to be a photographer (if it weren't for all those video-centered lenses)
  2. The Z lenses seem to be very important to Canon if they're filling out the trinity line-up that quickly. I hope Canon will complete the F2 trinity (if there was/ is one planed) and a small and compact 24-70mm F4 L would also be very welcomed to fill out the F4 trinity. As I've read/ heard, the RF 24-105mm F4 L isn't really considered being part of a F4 trinity. I not quite sure about that though. On the one hand, for the Z trinity 24-105mm F2.8 seems to have set a new standard and maybe Canon does consider the F4 version of the 24-105mm as part of a F4 trinity. On the other hand, there used to be a EF 24-70mm F4 L in the F4 trinity for EF mount and the 24-105mm is not on par with the 70-200mm and 14-35mm imo. And while we´re at it, a F2.8 non L 70-170mm should be a given I guess.

    Wow, that´d be a lot of trinities (or trinitys? the dictionary said there is no plural form)

    Z-trinity:
    RF 14-28mm F2.8 Z (rumored)
    RF 24-105mm F2.8 Z
    RF 70-200mm F2.8 Z

    F2.8 - L-trinity:
    RF 15-35mm F2.8
    RF 24-70mm F2.8
    RF 70-200mm F2.8

    F4 - L-trinity:
    RF 14-35mm F4
    RF 24-105mm F4 --> does it really count?
    RF 24-70mm F4 --> not available...are there any rumors???
    RF 70-200mm F4

    F2.8 - non L-trinity:
    RF 16-28mm F2.8
    RF 28-70mm F2.8
    RF 70-170mm F2.8 ??? --> rumored lens

    F2 L trinity --> hopefully there will be lenses to complete it
    RF 28-70mm F2
    rumored:
    RF 24-70mm F2
    RF 70-135/ 150mm F2
    RF UWA F2 zoom --> I am guessing it will either end at 28mm or 24mm depending on what Canon does with the successor of the RF 28-70mm F2. I have no idea where it would start.


    Five trinities (plus maybe the extra RF 24-105mm F4) would give us 15-16 great options and we're not even counting the 15-30mm and 24-105mm non L 🙂

    good times to be a photographer (if it weren't for all those video-centered lenses)
  3. small and compact 24-70mm F4 L
    I do not think that would be an L lens.
    I am thinking more of a set more in line with the RF 16-28 f/2.8 and RF 28-70 f/2.8.
    I do not see much of a point if it is not both smaller and cheaper than those.
  4. The 24-105 F4 most definitely counts if you are a travel photographer and need to keep your kit light.
    I'm heading to the mountains of India on Saturday for a month with 2x R5 II's and

    F4 - L-trinity:
    RF 14-35mm F4
    RF 24-105mm F4 --> does it really count?
    RF 70-200mm F4

    + the 35mm F1.4

    All gear can fit in a carry on backpack under 7KG.
  5. I won't buy it, being far too happy with the RF 15-35 f/2,8.
    Never had such a sharp WA zoom.
    OK, vignetting is on the high side, but I don't care, shooting landscapes between f/ 5,6 and f/11.
    And, what is very important to me, it is extremely sharp at 35mm, my most used focal length.
    My next buy will be the 24-70 II or f/2. 🙂
  6. I do not think that would be an L lens.
    I am thinking more of a set more in line with the RF 16-28 f/2.8 and RF 28-70 f/2.8.
    I do not see much of a point if it is not both smaller and cheaper than those.
    I think if it´d be really compact, it could attract some buyers such as people who own the RF 70-200mm F4. They´d be a perfect fit. The RF 24-105mm F4 L weighs 700gr is quite long. The EF 24-700mm is 600gr, so if Canon would be able to cut about 80gr (like they did with the RF 14-35mm F4 L despite becoming wider) it could be an intriguing offer.

    But you're right in one point: a new 24-70mm F4 would have some competition (RF 28-70 f/2.8) the EF version didn't have.
  7. RF 10-20 f/4 IS L makes 4.
    Damn, yet again I forgot this lens :/ never counted it to the F4 trinity because it was so heavy, couldn't take regular filter and was ultra specialized. Two out three things have changed now.
    Now all we need is that RF 200-500 f/4.
    This one and RF 35mm F1.2!
  8. The 24-105 F4 most definitely counts if you are a travel photographer and need to keep your kit light.
    I'm heading to the mountains of India on Saturday for a month with 2x R5 II's and

    F4 - L-trinity:
    RF 14-35mm F4
    RF 24-105mm F4 --> does it really count?
    RF 70-200mm F4

    + the 35mm F1.4

    All gear can fit in a carry on backpack under 7KG.
    Sounds like a great trip! Have fun and enjoy it! 🙂
  9. The 24-105 F4 most definitely counts if you are a travel photographer and need to keep your kit light.
    I'm heading to the mountains of India on Saturday for a month with 2x R5 II's and

    F4 - L-trinity:
    RF 14-35mm F4
    RF 24-105mm F4 --> does it really count?
    RF 70-200mm F4
    All gear can fit in a carry on backpack under 7KG.
    Mine is the RF14-35/4, RF24-105/4 and the RF100-500 under 3kg

    Worst case, I would drop the RF24-105/4 for my 2 lens kit under 2kg. Covers landscape and telephoto with cropping on the R5 if needed. Not good for portraits though 🙂
  10. I believe that it would cannibalise sales for the RF15-35/2.8. There isn't that much difference unless they can significantly improve vignetting, weight etc even with equivalent sharpness.

Leave a comment

Please log in to your forum account to comment