Canon RF 16-28mm f/2.8 IS STM First Look Reviews

Richard Cox
4 Min Read

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here's how it works.

We are starting to get more details released on the Canon RF 16-28mm f/2.8 IS STM, and while we've already given out our patent overview and MTF comparisons, more details are never bad.

It should be noted that pre-production versions of the lenses have gone out to the usual reviewers, so I do believe that they are not allowed to post full-sized images detailing the exact level of performance that you can get from the lens.

Preorder Options

Gordon of Cameralabs had a chance to use a pre-production model of the lens and feels the lens certainly is quite good;

My time with the new RF 16-28 2.8 was fairly brief so far, but it certainly delivered some impressive results, sharp into the corners and capable of greater separation than the budget 15-30 thanks to the brighter and constant aperture. And bonus points for having both weather sealing and optical image stabilisation.

https://www.cameralabs.com/canon-rf-16-28mm-f2-8-is-stm-review/

DigitalCameraWorld (DCW) for short, has also weighed in on the Canon RF 16-28mm f/2.8 IS STM and a little oddly compared it against the Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L IS USM, not a lens that I would have chosen as my basis of comparison. But it's also a good point that Canon has progressed from being rather sad and quite, well, comically bad at making ultra wides to basically being able to make almost any ultra wide that can be imagined, and some, like this lens – ones that people didn't even really imagine. DCW does show some close-up crops, so you can determine for yourself the corner performance, etc.

The Canon RF 16-28mm f/2.8 IS STM is small, light, weather-sealed, feature-packed and half the price of its 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM sibling – so what's not to like! If you're thinking of buying a wide-angle zoom for your R-series camera, you could do far worse than the RF 16-28mm. It boasts incredible stabilization, quiet autofocus that's fast and smooth, and my early tests with a beta sample show comparable image quality to the older Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L USM III.

https://www.digitalcameraworld.com/cameras/lenses/canon-rf-16-28mm-f-2-8-is-stm-review

As well as written reviews, there are quite a bit of video resources now out and my top picks in that category are below.

Preorder Options

Go to discussion...

Share This Article
Follow:
Richard has been using Canon cameras since the 1990s, with his first being the now legendary EOS-3. Since then, Richard has continued to use Canon cameras and now focuses mostly on the genre of infrared photography.

167 comments

  1. As we do every release, we'll take a look at the MTFs of the newest Canon RF 16-28mm f/2.8 IS STM and see how it measures up to other lenses in Canon's arsenal to give you a better idea of how the lens will perform in real life.


    TLDR; If you are okay with the limited zoom range, this lens will not disappoint you.

  2. Very interesting, but the price bites a bit for a non-L lens. But it's f/2.8... I wonder if it works well for Astro and how much software corrections it requires.

    it's L quality performance though. the MTF's are very good. limited zoom range helps with that.
  3. That announcement took me by surprise. Looks like a very decent lens, just like the 28-70mm F2.8.
    Wondering what benefits and disadvantages I´d have if I swap it for my RF 14-35mm F4. Given the current price point and the fact I love my 14-35mm, I´m not gonna switch now. But if the new lens has good performance in the corners and wide open (night sky/ night scapes) I might consider swapping them one day.
  4. Very interesting, but the price bites a bit for a non-L lens. But it's f/2.8... I wonder if it works well for Astro and how much software corrections it requires.
    I think it is within range of similar lenses. The Sony FE 16-25mm f/2.8 G is $1200, and the Sigma 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN C is $900. Both of these lenses don't have optical IS.
  5. Canon RF 15-40mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM sounds like a very versatile lens 🙂 Where can I get one? 🙂

    Just judging from MFT´s (Thx Richard) it almost looks like the new lens might outperform the 15-35mm L. If so, there is another reason for a mkii version (beside weight).
  6. That announcement took me by surprise. Looks like a very decent lens, just like the 28-70mm F2.8.
    Wondering what benefits and disadvantages I´d have if I swap it for my RF 14-35mm F4. Given the current price point and the fact I love my 14-35mm, I´m not gonna switch now. But if the new lens has good performance in the corners and wide open (night sky/ night scapes) I might consider swapping them one day.
    it caught me by surprise too!
  7. An interesting thought: if you are happy with a 20 MP crop, this is effectively a 16-42mm lens on an R5 and unlike may super wide zooms, the center looks very sharp at 28mm, so that calculation should prove to be quite accurate. Sometimes more MP make a big difference. This is also a lens that will likely be significantly discounted by the next Black Friday, particularly in the Canon Refurb section. The 85 f/2 was very reasonable there a few weeks ago and I grabbed one.
  8. WOW! That came quite out of the blue... MTFS look promising.
    Still quite expensive
    German MRSP: 1.299,00 €
    And €1319 Netherlands MRSP. Not so far from the excellent 14-35 f/4L IS. The 2.8 with this focal length seems more of an indoor event lens. Edit: and maybe an astro option?
  9. And €1319 Netherlands MRSP. Not so far from the excellent 14-35 f/4L IS. The 2.8 with this focal length seems more of an indoor event lens. Edit: and maybe an astro option?
    Yes, the 14-35L is €1300-ish with grey import. I have been considering replacing my 15-30STM with something brighter, but not bigger, this give me more choice in the same price range.
    Ah, GAS is a wonderful thing.
  10. touche 😉
    Funny thing: I read 15-40mm and my immediate reaction: Omg, how on earth did I miss Canon releasing a spiritual successor for the EF 17-40mm L lens. 🤣 Even weirder, I started googling the non-existent lens 🤣🤣 What do we learn: don´t read about surprising lens announcements early in the morning and especially before you had your first coffee 🙂
  11. This little line of lenses goes completely unnoticed! (Even European retailers)
    Not really. Before switching here, I read it in an email from fotokoch.de, a German retailer, who even offers this lens for a slightly reduced price together with the 2.8/28-70.

    I was shocked that I hadn't read about it here yet ;-)
  12. Not really. Before switching here, I read it in an email from fotokoch.de, a German retailer, who even offers this lens for a slightly reduced price together with the 2.8/28-70.

    doesn't surprise me. the R8 plus the two lenses is a very good travel kit for under 1400g.

Leave a comment

Please log in to your forum account to comment