Camera Sales Drop According to CIPA

Richard Cox
4 Min Read
CIPA 2025

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here's how it works.

The shipments from Japan this year have been somewhat puzzling, driven by the narrative and uncertainty surrounding the tariffs imposed by the United States across multiple industries. I long thought that the Japanese companies were working overtime and moving cameras everywhere, being completely unsure about what would happen this year.

Sales Dip

The first month of this potentially damaging disruption was August, and we are seeing the effect on CIPA's shipments, as year-over-year shipments of interchangeable lens cameras are down to 84% of those from 2024 and are even lower than those from 2023.

Okay, but it's not all bad. Year on year, the shipments of cameras remain higher than in 2024, but we are starting to see a downward trend, and it's unclear where it will stop. I had long thought that this year's CIPA data would be difficult to predict, and we may not even know the final results until January 2026.

The Data Breakdown

Now onto the data, because it's, well, strange. You'd think from the above and also knowing a bit about what is happening in the world that the biggest hit on shipments would have been to the USA; however, shipments of built-in lens cameras are up 26% and interchangeable lens cameras are about the same as last year at 99.7% of August 2024.

Overall, in the Americas, year-over-year, built-in lens cameras are up 14%, and interchangeable cameras are up 14%.

Canon released several new built-in lens cameras – including this “new” one.

China, which has shown significant gains in camera shipments over the last year or so, fell flat in August, with shipments only reaching 75% of those in August 2024. Still, China is up 15% year-over-year and remains the region with the most interchangeable lens cameras shipped to, leading slightly ahead of the Americas. There was one interesting change in August 2025 for China, specifically the built-in lens cameras, which increased by 56% compared to August 2024.

The newer built-in lens camera models may be contributing to this increase in sales, especially compared to last year. Still, the number of built-in cameras shipped to China is small, at only 30,267, compared to Japan, which shipped 41,631.

Even more surprising than China's dip in shipments is the fact that interchangeable lens camera shipments to Europe were 57% of those in August 2024, and even built-in lens cameras remained essentially flat at 97.4% of August 2024 levels.

Canon Powershot V1

I suspect cameras like the Canon Powershot V1, shown above, have contributed to the increased shipments of built-in lens cameras globally. The Canon Elph 360a, not so much.

In short, shipments to the Americas remained relatively constant while shipments to China and Europe dropped significantly. Why is this? I have no idea.

Conclusion

Overall, no one can complain yet. The camera market is experiencing an 8% growth in shipments for interchangeable lens cameras and nearly 14% for built-in lens cameras. If this continues, and the consignment settles down for the remainder of the year, the camera companies could have a good year.

But if the trend line over the last few months continues, it could be rough sailing ahead.

Go to discussion...

Share This Article
Follow:
Richard has been using Canon cameras since the 1990s, with his first being the now legendary EOS-3. Since then, Richard has continued to use Canon cameras and now focuses mostly on the genre of infrared photography.

31 comments

  1. Difficult to interpret, that's true...
    Seems, that built-in lens cameras are gaining ground, because people recognize, that cell phone cameras cannot handle everything.
    But ILC are still too big for those people, Vloggers, etc.
  2. There are three cameras I would buy immediately ifwhen Canon releases them:
    1. R7 II (I have an R7)
    2. RE-1 retro look camera (AE-1 was my dream camera as a kid)
    3. G3x update (I’m still using my 2015 G3x)
  3. Difficult to interpret, that's true...
    Seems, that built-in lens cameras are gaining ground, because people recognize, that cell phone cameras cannot handle everything.
    But ILC are still too big for those people, Vloggers, etc.
    Everyone does not want everything on their cell phone even if it could handle it. Many people have second burner cell phones strictly for travel.
  4. Powershot V1 and R50 doing well. I anticipate the C50 likewise.
    I wonder when Canon will release a photocentric Powershot with their new 1.4" sensor. It's a safe bet that they didn't create a new sensor and a new sensor size for just one camera model.
  5. Many people have second burner cell phones strictly for travel.
    I know, because of my business travel.
    But many more people have jobs that do not involve travelling.
    And many more people travel to countries where they feel safe and (think they) don't need "second burner cell phones".
  6. I know, because of my business travel.
    But many more people have jobs that do not involve travelling.
    And many more people travel to countries where they feel safe and (think they) don't need "second burner cell phones".
    i prefer camera's with better low light performance and longer telephoto capabilities than cell phones currently deliver. cell phones do ok for well lit group photos, wide-ish angle scenery and white-board capture. but past that i think you need something else. i have a 1 inch super zoom pocketable for when my r5+R24-240 are too big to carry. also there are situations using a pocketable camera is more acceptable than an ILC would be.
  7. i prefer camera's with better low light performance and longer telephoto capabilities than cell phones currently deliver. cell phones do ok for well lit group photos, wide-ish angle scenery and white-board capture. but past that i think you need something else. i have a 1 inch super zoom pocketable for when my r5+R24-240 are too big to carry. also there are situations using a pocketable camera is more acceptable than an ILC would be.
    Fully agree and thank you, for being my role model 🙂 (except for having an ILC, too 😉 )
  8. Lol, in broad day light, my wife's phone takes better image than my R8.

    It auto dim the bright background also brighthen up the face..

    How can I defeat this?!

    Sorry for the lack of better terms.
  9. Lol, in broad day light, my wife's phone takes better image than my R8.

    It auto dim the bright background also brighthen up the face..

    How can I defeat this?!

    Sorry for the lack of better terms.
    it is true. with the phone you get correction software for free. easy to draw mustaches on there too. i am not sure how a camera company can build a business case for good + free correction software for cameras like the r8. is the screen big enough to show off the pics in a social setting? on the otherhand, i think r8 + cannon's dpp software is more likely to get you large format printable results.
  10. Lol, in broad day light, my wife's phone takes better image than my R8.

    It auto dim the bright background also brighthen up the face..

    How can I defeat this?!

    Sorry for the lack of better terms.
    Fully agree! In good light steady subject and no tele is needed, phones make (internally cook) photos, that look great, until you put them on a >24" screen.
    But when light gets dim, action takes place, tele is needed and/or bigger prints/screens come into play, they get weaker in their results.
    So I fully agree with @snapshot, too.

    Getting back to the start:
    I didn't want to start a discussion about Phones vs. P&S vs. ILC. Everybody please select the tool that works best for you.
    I was just thinking about potential reasons, why P&S or built-in lens camera sales go up again...
  11. There's not much to motivate anyone to buy a new camera. If you've got a 6D, why would you buy an R6 or R6II? Just to have another 24MP camera? Oh but this and that feature, you say. Still going to be a picture that's just the same as the camera someone already has. Now rinse and repeat for Sony & Nikon. The upgrades have not compelling enough for the hobbiest/casual shooter. Not to mention that 24MP is about half that of the typical phone.

    This is why I think the R6III needs 32MP, or more - it's different/more and will encourage more buyers than another 24MP camera that I could probably take with an R8 or R8II which is much cheaper.
  12. I wonder when Canon will release a photocentric Powershot with their new 1.4" sensor. It's a safe bet that they didn't create a new sensor and a new sensor size for just one camera model.

    I wonder this to i already thought they would already bring out a powershot for photographers, but we will wait and wait and wait
  13. There's not much to motivate anyone to buy a new camera. If you've got a 6D, why would you buy an R6 or R6II? Just to have another 24MP camera? Oh but this and that feature, you say. Still going to be a picture that's just the same as the camera someone already has. Now rinse and repeat for Sony & Nikon. The upgrades have not compelling enough for the hobbiest/casual shooter. Not to mention that 24MP is about half that of the typical phone.

    This is why I think the R6III needs 32MP, or more - it's different/more and will encourage more buyers than another 24MP camera that I could probably take with an R8 or R8II which is much cheaper.
    I'm not sure if the 6D is the best example. I went from a 6D Mark II to the R and it was a leap! I wouldn't want to go back to SLRs.
  14. There's not much to motivate anyone to buy a new camera. If you've got a 6D, why would you buy an R6 or R6II? Just to have another 24MP camera? Oh but this and that feature, you say. Still going to be a picture that's just the same as the camera someone already has. Now rinse and repeat for Sony & Nikon. The upgrades have not compelling enough for the hobbiest/casual shooter. Not to mention that 24MP is about half that of the typical phone.

    This is why I think the R6III needs 32MP, or more - it's different/more and will encourage more buyers than another 24MP camera that I could probably take with an R8 or R8II which is much cheaper.
    While resolution is important (I am in the camp that wants more mp!), I think the leap from DSLR to mirrorless is significant, thanks to the improvements in AF. The AF of modern mirrorless alone would justify the upgrade in my humble opinion
  15. While resolution is important (I am in the camp that wants more mp!), I think the leap from DSLR to mirrorless is significant, thanks to the improvements in AF. The AF of modern mirrorless alone would justify the upgrade in my humble opinion
    Fully agree!
    To me it was (sadly, in first) clear, that DSLRs would die.
    First iterations of the EVF (Oly OM5, RP, R, ...) were simply to slow for me and my action photography (dragonflies).
    But having the R6m2 now, I wouldn't want to step back.

    Give new P&S the AF of an R50 and the latest 1" sensor generation and they'd be really great.
  16. Fully agree!
    To me it was (sadly, in first) clear, that DSLRs would die.
    First iterations of the EVF (Oly OM5, RP, R, ...) were simply to slow for me and my action photography (dragonflies).
    But having the R6m2 now, I wouldn't want to step back.

    Give new P&S the AF of an R50 and the latest 1" sensor generation and they'd be really great.
    Action photography drives most of my (non-P+S) camera purchases and i could see sony was making good progress on AF with their mirrorless, A9 seemed really good. However, the lense selection wasnt that great and it seemed that AF performance with canon lenses via a meta-bones adapter mostly lost the advantages. i stuck with 5D4 and its 7 fps until R5 arrived. For P+S i like having 200mm 35mm reach, so a 1" sensor is about as big as you can put in a pocketable form factor, better auto focus than zs100 would be cool.
  17. While resolution is important (I am in the camp that wants more mp!), I think the leap from DSLR to mirrorless is significant, thanks to the improvements in AF. The AF of modern mirrorless alone would justify the upgrade in my humble opinion

    It's also very expensive and a huge hurdle that many will decide is not worth the cost because there just aren't enough benefits.

Leave a comment

Please log in to your forum account to comment