The 1 Series Arrives for the RF Mount

Canon Europe has the specs as well.

Some errors/omissions in the specs on the main post (which match B&H). Canon Europe has the full list.

For example, max shutter speed is 1/64000 like the R3 (not 1/16000), and flash sync with electronic shutter is 1/400 s (the 1/320 is with EFCS). Means at most a 2.5 ms readout speed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Upvote 0
R1 is flagship only within the Canon ecosystem, not the world mirrorless market. They want you to believe that megapixels don't matter.

One thing I have understood.
Canon will not do what you want them to do, Canon will do what they want to do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Upvote 0
One thing I have understood.
Canon will not do what you want them to do, Canon will do what they want to do.
Canon doesn’t care what you want them to do. They care what camera buyers in aggregate want them to do. Their domination of the market with nearly 50% share says their understanding of the market is vastly superior to yours.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
Upvote 0
40 fps @ 24MP also seems a touch low for a speed focused camera, especially since the R6II and R8 do the same speed (with worse AF I am sure, but the headline number does count for something).

The R5 Mark II ends up with a higher pixels/second count (45 x 30 = 1350 MP/sec) over the R1 (24 x 40 = 960 MP/sec).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
The R1 is pretty disappointing but im not the target market anyway. But after years of rumors, development announcement and fanfare, we basically got a 24MP R3 mark II.
The R5 is a solid update, just shame for the price increase.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0
R1 is quite disappointing! R1 was released 3 years after others, but it was actually 2 years behind others' technology. R1 only has 24MP and requires AI forgery to reach 64MP. I feel that even the entry-level machine is better than R1!
 
Upvote 0
R1 is flagship only within the Canon ecosystem, not the world mirrorless market. They want you to believe that megapixels don't matter.

One thing I have understood.
Canon will not do what you want them to do, Canon will do what they want to do.
I don't think that is true anymore with the cinema and 5 series. They seem to be trying to give us new features that people ask for since the R5. For the 1 series you are probably correct. I also don't think the 1 series is their big seller like the rest of their line up and maybe suited just for pros that need a camera that works and works fast. It's funny how much crap Canon gets for a camera people aren't going to buy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Upvote 0
The R3 might get an update in a few years. For example the smaller size and a global shutter would be enough differentiation from the R1.
With 2.5ms readout or less, a 50 year old global shutter technology is irrelevent in 2024. And a lost of 2 stops of dynamic range is rediculous. Global shutter is fine if ya can only readout in slow 4ms and above. 2ms readout approaching 0 secs is damn near gs speed without all the DR loss of a 50 year old Kodak technology.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Upvote 0
... R1 only has 24MP and requires AI forgery to reach 64MP....
I think it gets to 96MP, not 64MP, but on the understanding the camera is simply doing software up resolution (as against pixel shift or something like that), I am disappointed to see that on a camera like the R1. I know resolution can be increased in post processing on a computer anyway, computational photography and AI may be the future (for better or worse), and I may be in a minority in feeling as I do, but personally I am very unimpressed to see this sort of fabrication (it's the best term I can think of right now!) of an image coming out of this sort of camera. I am not in the R1's target market and I was never going to buy one anyway, so my view is irrelevant in that sense, but that feature really puts me off it. (Yes, I appreciate that if it's in the R1 it may well become a common camera feature over time.)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0