Latest activity

SnowMiku · 2026-05-05T22:19:47-0400

blobmonster said:
Yes the size of the R8 is a massive advantage. Thats also ironically why Id love to see a built in flash.

Paired with the 28mm and a 50mm, there would be no lens shadow, and you don't need to bring a flash when travelling light. Its a real shame that you can buy the best full frame cameras but if you want a built in flash, you always need the aps-c. It makes little sense to me. If Im using a big lens, I will pack a big flash.

I would also like to see a built in flash on the R8 II. I've used it a few times with my 90D and M50 II for butterflies to fill in the light.

GirlsAreBeautiful · 2026-05-05T21:56:48-0400

Del Paso said:
You'll see it when reviewing in camera the picture you've just taken.

Oh yes, that first message you get when booting up the camera. Very annoying.

Dragon · 2026-05-05T21:45:37-0400

AlanF said:
Hell, th

Hell, the site kept changing C o c k (without spaces) to penis!? I'll type it without spaces here, penis. And it changes it again!

Just think what it will be like when Word Press incorporates AI

.

neuroanatomist · 2026-05-05T20:05:00-0400

robholding said:
One firmware feature I’d really love to see on the R5 Mark II is a dedicated “spirit level only” display mode.

Can that be set up already? It can on my R1.

john1970 · 2026-05-05T19:45:41-0400

Glad to see that the new R1 firmware will allow us to assign a button to turn precapture on and off. Thank you Canon.

I do wonder what the major autofocus enhancement will be. It could be the addition of other sports under the Sports events setting?

I am going on a trip with the R1 in mid-May so I will not be updating the firmware until I get back (although the pre-assigned button has me tempted).

KingLOSO · 2026-05-05T19:08:39-0400

Honestly if they could add open gate I would be happy! Even if it requires the add on battery cooler.

Lukas Haupt · 2026-05-05T18:31:08-0400

robholding said:
One firmware feature I’d really love to see on the R5 Mark II is a dedicated “spirit level only” display mode.
At the moment, pressing INFO cycles through a black screen, a clean image with no info, and then the full info overlay which includes the level, but there’s no option to show just the level on its own without all the other icons and data.

A clean, standalone level (ideally slightly larger) would be incredibly useful for tripod work, interiors, architecture and landscapes. It’s a small firmware change that would make a big difference in real‑world shooting. Am I alone?

You can turn off and edit all those screens. I am shooting real estate a lot and basicly I have one screen with histogram and big level (you can actually choose small or big one) and clean one. So pushing INFO btn I am quickly switching between those.

AlanF · 2026-05-05T18:22:38-0400

Hell, th

AlanF said:
C o c k Linnet this afternoon (R5ii + RF 200-800mm).

View attachment 229291 View attachment 229292

Hell, the site kept changing C o c k (without spaces) to penis!? I'll type it without spaces here, penis. And it changes it again!

robholding · 2026-05-05T18:17:37-0400

One firmware feature I’d really love to see on the R5 Mark II is a dedicated “spirit level only” display mode.
At the moment, pressing INFO cycles through a black screen, a clean image with no info, and then the full info overlay which includes the level, but there’s no option to show just the level on its own without all the other icons and data.

A clean, standalone level (ideally slightly larger) would be incredibly useful for tripod work, interiors, architecture and landscapes. It’s a small firmware change that would make a big difference in real‑world shooting. Am I alone?

Martin868 · 2026-05-05T16:11:13-0400

Along with the R7 mark II I suppose.

Click · 2026-05-05T15:22:13-0400

Maximilian said:
Backlit wren, singing enchantingly, but not for me

View attachment 229306 View attachment 229307

A nice interplay of light and shadow. I especially like the second one.

AlanF · 2026-05-05T08:40:02-0400

While we are on to flying geese, this pair of Canada had remarkable synchronization (R5ii + RF 100-500mm).

blobmonster · 2026-05-05T08:38:06-0400

neuroanatomist said:
When I travel with the R8, I take the 270EX II ‘just in case’.

Yes that' what I sometimes do, that way you have proper fill flash for hss with wide apertures. Unfortunately though, its just one more thing to remember to bring and its still bulky/not twistable when not needed or for in-home use, so I don't leave it on the camera.

I own lots of flashes, but my favourite flash is the built-in flash because I dont have to worry about charging it or putting it on if I need it for snapshots. I can just pop it up, and it doesn't get knocked when not in use, or add hardly any weight. With modern iso, they dont need to be powerful to make a big difference.

I own lots of big flashes, but I've never found a small flash that I love more than a built in flash. My favourite is the one on my little M6 cos' it bounces, but bounce is not necessary. I do still love the direct flash look with -1 exp comp or -1 fec. I dont like dingy/shady shots of faces, flash means I'm in control of the light and have options.

With the 28mm, an r8ii would be brilliant to sling round the shoulder for casual outings, but unless it has a flash, I'd honestly prefer an r10 with ef-s 24mm.

neuroanatomist · 2026-05-05T08:29:23-0400

Noise said:
How do you handle lens that don't have a lens control ring to assign ISO to, or the lens control ring is switched between focus and control ring?

Not an issue, for me.

First off, I don’t have many of either. Lenses without a control ring, I only have three EF-mount lenses – the 600/4 II that I only use in Fv, and the TS-E 17/24 where I’m composing on the rear LCD anyway, so I use that to set ISO.

I have only two RF lenses that lack a dedicated control ring, the 24-240 and the 28/2.8. I use those lenses only when traveling, and therefore on my R8 exclusively. They are only used handheld on the go, so autofocus and auto ISO only.

If you haven’t used Fv mode, I suggest you give it a try. I put off doing so for a long time, but after trying it I disabled Av and Tv modes on my R3 then my R1, and the only modes I use are M and Fv (more accurately, I use just three C# modes based on Fv, and have also disabled Fv, such that with mode changing assigned to the M.Fn button I can rapidly cycle through just the three C# modes and M).

Fv came with the EOS R, and is designed to enable easy manual control of the three sides of the exposure triangle with just two dials.

neuroanatomist · 2026-05-05T06:31:17-0400

blobmonster said:
If Im using a big lens, I will pack a big flash.

When I travel with the R8, I take the 270EX II ‘just in case’.

HenryL · 2026-05-05T06:26:04-0400

Yes that video from Fro was an April Fools joke.

axtstern · 2026-05-05T06:11:43-0400

I learned from this side that Canon Says it’s up to Sigma to Make Full-Frame RF Lenses

However others seem to have more information:

Plenty of RF lenses coming

I see Short Vids on Youtube claiming that Sigma, Tamron and Viltrox got several full frame lenses green lighted from Canon.
Several from Sigma , among others the 35-100 2,8 from Tamron and a single lens from Viltrox

All is quiet here on the forum.

Do I hunt for a late Aprils Fool Joke or is there some big news coming?

mimbu · 2026-05-05T05:00:35-0400

Mxw.be said:
So no rfs lenses in the pipeline?

Viltrox once released some lenses for RF. Canon made a bunch of legal threats and Viltrox pulled those lenses and removed all mention of them from their website. It's as though the lenses never existed, but they did. Same thing happened with Samyang with the same result.

Canon has always been the most aggressively anti-third-party glass, and now they have patents on the mount & protocols to effectively block RF users from having choice.

If choice is important to you, RF is the wrong mount to own.

Mxw.be · 2026-05-05T04:41:07-0400

So no rfs lenses in the pipeline?

blobmonster · 2026-05-05T04:29:46-0400

neuroanatomist said:
More than a little bit bigger, which for some would be a significant negative and not at all an improvement.

Personally, I like that the R8 uses the LP-E17, because it shares that battery with other cameras that I have and often travel with – the PowerShot V1, M6II and my full spectrum M6. Three of those bodies can charge the battery in-camera, meaning I don't even need to bring the wall-wart charger.

Yes the size of the R8 is a massive advantage. Thats also ironically why Id love to see a built in flash.

Paired with the 28mm and a 50mm, there would be no lens shadow, and you don't need to bring a flash when travelling light. Its a real shame that you can buy the best full frame cameras but if you want a built in flash, you always need the aps-c. It makes little sense to me. If Im using a big lens, I will pack a big flash.

blobmonster · 2026-05-05T04:24:11-0400

Uneternal said:
Crop the 28mm by 1.25 and you have a 35mm. On a 32MP sensor, you'll have 20.5MP left.

Yes that's why it would be great to see Canon bring back the 1.3 crop mode from the 5DS (i.e. like aps-h) where you can compose in the focal length you plan to keep, and still have the raw file.

Digital cropping is amazing with the lens quality and resolution these days. Thats why popular compact cameras like the leica q3 and fuji x100 employ it. I'd often rather crop a f1.4 prime by 1.3x or 1.6x than use an f4 zoom of the same size. Even cropped, the f1.4 output will have potential for shallower depth of field. The 1.3x raw crop would be amazing for the 28mm pancake.

As photographers we typically want to compose and think in the focal length of the output. So technically while the image quality would be much more than adequate, the actual photographs would still have been composed at 28mm unless I use a 35mm ovf (something I love to do on flat top cameras but which looks silly and gives up a lot with an r5 or r8 etc...) not to mention cropping every file in post is time consuming. The Leica q3 files keep the full raw but apply the crop automatically in the file so you don't have to adjust unless you need to...

davidespinosa · 2026-05-05T01:43:24-0400

(1) Canon may eventually update the 24-105 f/4L.
In case someone has intelligent commentary -- I don't !

(2) The 24-105 f/4L has external zoom (image courtesy of Ken Rockwell):

Noise · 2026-05-05T00:12:10-0400

neuroanatomist said:
I suppose those are possible, but I don’t think they’re at all likely. Call Canon directly.

How often do you manually adjust ISO in a hurry? Personally, I almost never do so outside of situations where I have ample time, Auto ISO is my usual setting in both Fv and M (those are the only modes I use). On my R1, I have ISO assigned to the lens control ring and EC assigned to the Quick Control Dial (on the back around the Set button), so when I need EC it’s easy to dial in with my thumb, without taking my eye from the viewfinder.

If I need to set ISO manually, which I do when setting up flash shooting, or on a tripod, I have time to adjust it using the lens control ring or the rear LCD.

Thank! Good idea. I like your assigning of exposure compensation to the back wheel in manual mode with auto ISO so it similar to where it is assigned in Av and Tv. How do you handle lens that don't have a lens control ring to assign ISO to, or the lens control ring is switched between focus and control ring?

Noise · 2026-05-04T23:58:54-0400

DocInfoSci said:
Awesome — thanks for the detailed reply! That all makes sense to me. I'll have to give it a go myself when I land and have a minute. Usually if I'm in M I'm running strobes and even with ambient mixes I like to lock it all down. Always fun to try new approaches, though.

DocInfoSci said:

This is interesting. I agree that I find M just fine, but I tend to not use it in auto ISO mode. For that I have Fv.

What I would expect (my camera is packed for a trip or I'd test) is that in auto ISO mode M would target a balanced image -- i.e., an exposure of +/- 0, to put it in a crude way. Which is probably why Canon doesn't bother in M mode — either the image is balanced, or you're being "creative."

Let's assume that's how it works for a second — the balanced image of 0 is the target. If I had auto ISO on but the shutter and aperture were set in such a way that auto ISO cannot achieve a balanced image (e.g., my lens cap is on because it's a really slow coffee morning) would the idea be that an EC metric showed that 0 could not be achieved? i.e., -3 or worse.

But even if, wouldn't a histogram achieve such? To such a degree of the JPEG conversion, at any rate.

@Noise — what is the effect and use that you're trying to achieve?

Click to expand...

Would like the +/- exposure compensation button on top of R1 to enable the front dial to offset the exposure ( ISO selected by camera) when in manual mode with auto ISO. Currently it changes f-stop. I dislike currently having to take my eye away from viewfinder to touch the exposure compensation scale at the bottom of the screen to adjust exposure compensation.

ronbyram · 2026-05-04T23:18:59-0400

ronbyram said:
gang, I got notice today that My EF 24-105 F4 and EF 870-200 II are being unsupported at the end of the month. (May/June) Anyone else get notice? Also, I no Longer have these lens and can someone point me on How to drop them from my Canon hardware list? I know it may affect my CPS classification.

got reply but several Camera and Lens does not give me option to delete. 70-200 and the two 7D Mark II

Latest activity

Latest activity

Filter

Forum statistics

Gallery statistics