What’s Coming Next from Canon?

Hi Craig! Earlier this year I saw Your article about hints of the unicorn itself - the RF 35 mm f1.2L - aka the little-brother of the RF 50/85 mm f1.2L's. Has the rumours stopped and the unicorn once a again has entered the deep magical woods - or is it still some whistles that keep the dream alive?

Thanks for all You are doing digging into Canon's next steps 🙏
Upvote 0

Canon Officially Announces the RF 20-50mm f/4L IS USM PZ

I ordered the lens from B&H at 9:02 a.m EDT and also separately ordered 10 of the new RF rear caps. I will likely also need to order additional rear caps, but B&H set the maximum at 10.
Interesting, I ordered 30 of the new caps from B & H. They confirmed the order, just pending on delivery. IMHO, this is an update that only makes sense if you go wholesale. Perhaps it is because I didn't order immediately after the preorder button was available and hence didn't have the "first batch" constraint.
Upvote 0

Lens Dust Cap RF II – Canon's BIGGEST 13-May announcement

I didn’t see this thread until now, so I’ll quote these two replies here:

Judging by the photograph on dpreview, it looks like the new cap just lacks the protrusions we can cut on the original, to make it fit in more positions.
Indeed, only two tabs. But I have no desire to cut down the number of lens caps I have to save $8 each.

View attachment 229463
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0

Canon Officially Announces the EOS R6 V

My hope for compact flat top FF ILC had died when I read about the active fan and I saw the pictures.

I wonder if they could have made its screen larger.

Anyway, maybe the R8 Mk II will do the trick, but likely not. If not I'll just get a discounted R8.

If I wasn't in Canon land I might have actually looked into the Nikon ZR. It offers quite the intriguing package together with the also weather sealed 26mm pancake. If the ZR had the Z8 sensor I might have considered jumping ship.
Upvote 0

Sony ups the ante with the A7RVI and FE 100-400mm f/4.5 GM OSS

Maybe, the main difference is the rolling shutter speed: 19.6ms versus 3.8ms for the A1 II (versus 6.3ms for the R5 Mk II).
Thank you, I actually did not check all of the technical data. I still think that it is a very capable camera. For DGO and the better dynamic range you have to use the mechanical shutter anyway.
For me personally the 67MP would be too much (beside the price 😅).
Upvote 0

Canon EOS R1 & R5 Mark II Firmware v1.3.0 Arriving Soon

One button toggle on and off of precapture is great, must admit that I thought that they would never do it, so really great that they actually did it, thanks Canon….

One major flaw with the programming of the camera that still remain, and which I don’t see anyone else talking about, is that in Av (and P) mode(s), You for some odd reason can’t get a faster shutterspeed than 1/8000th, and with f/1.2 in bright sunshine and a white swan or dress, thát is not going to cut it, so one have to change to M mode, but setting for instance 1/12.800th of a second there, if a cloud cover the sun for a moment, and one for some reason doesn’t adjust, or if there suddenly is a shot in the shade to be caught, the AutoISO may end up at 1600 or something, and on a bright sunny day, thát is simply stupid....

- Particularly considering that while noise is no major problem at ISO 1600, the number of tones from black to white will be reduced, and thát doesn’t help with the ability to recover details in the highlights, if allowing faster shutterspeeds in Av (and P), thát would be no problem whatsoever, You just stay in Av and shoot whatever You see….



It could also be at a concert, where the scene all of a sudden explode in bright light, in both Av and M there will be a whole lot of adjusting that need to be done, very quickly, so thát image is basically impossible to catch.

- Any way, if the problem is that in faster shutterspeeds than 1/16.000th, the shutter change in whole stops, then AutoISO can fix thát without ever getting past ISO 200….

Go to Fv mode then, people have said, but
I have been in Av since I bought my first Canon, the Eos 620, back in the ’80s, and really prefer to stay there, together with exposure compensation on the rear wheel, and now AutoISO, You have complete control over the camera, in very simple steps….
Upvote 0

R5II and Video Pre-Roll

Hi All,

The R5II has a feature called pre-roll where the camera records 3 or 5 seconds of video to the buffer once the feature enabled. Once in video mode, pre-roll cannot be turned on and off. Once you set pre-roll on, it is on until you turn it off in the settings. This seems odd to me as it would wastes battery and potentially overheats the camera while waiting for a particular scene to develop. This is different from how pre-capture for stills is implemented where writing to the buffer begins with a half press of the shutter button. Canon must have had a reason for implementing pre-roll as they did. But I do not understand why. Does anyone have insight on this?

Don
In stills mode, Precapture forces you to hold down the shutter button halfway and then fully to keep shooting, in video land the record button is a toggle and has no half-way mode. So conceptually, pre-roll shouldn't require extra presses for it to work as people expect a record button to work.

Not only does it turn your camera into a space heater, it has a timeout as well, so you can't wait for half an hour.
Upvote 0

Canon EOS R6 V Specs: Active Cooling and more…

then tell me why canon R50V still support 1st curtain electronic shutter ?
Most likely because with a 35ms readout speed, Canon felt they had to give the R50 V a physical shutter curtain (just one, though), whereas with a 13 ms readout speed, they felt that was fast enough for the R6 V.
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Upvote 0

Here are the Full Canon EOS R6 V Specifications

If the R6 V has the same readout speed as the R6III (13-13.5 ms), that would support X-sync of around 1/60 s - 1/80 s. I guess Canon decided that was too slow.
The R5II showed me how much I desire ES+flash, so any new bodies I want to purchase need to support that. This likely means that my R8 won't get upgraded by the rumoured R8II, but I don't mind that :)
Upvote 0

Why Not Update the R3 and Make it a Photographers Only Camera?

The point remains – a 'stills-only' camera is not going to be cheaper to make, and is going to be more expensive to sell because fewer people will buy it. Therefore, your wishlist will remain just that...on April 1st and on every other day of the year. Sorry for the reality-check.
Okay, it will cost more because it would be a boutique product and the manufacturing process would have to change thereby increasing the cost. My thought becomes part of the April 1st wishlist. No problem. Reality checks are welcome.
Upvote 0

Dragonflies and Damselflies

What do you reckon this one is? An immature Common Blue? Obsidentify gives higher probability of a Variable.
Top view on the abdomen would make it easier. especially the first abdomen segment.
But I am very much with you and what ObsIdentify says that it is a immature male Enallagma cyathigerum (common blue/bluet)
Go here:
https://www.libellen.tv/libelle_gemeine-becherjungfer_enallagma-cyathigerum.html (German)
scroll down to the point "Reifezeit" and compare it to the photo of Barbara Bargmann.
Look at the abdomen pattern. I would give it more than the 67% that ObsID tells me.
Upvote 0

What We Expect Canon to Announce in the Coming Months

whatever happened to the X100-style retro Canon camera? this needed to be at market like two years ago...
If by two years ago, you mean 10 years ago or whenever the first x100 started gathering cult status, then i agree.

Realistically, while Canon could have put an f2.8 35mm prime in the g1x3, dropped the flip screen, and made the shape either more retro (or just less of a protuding evf), the x100 trick was the ovf with data overlay, which can't easily be copied.

These days however, evf tech has arguably caught up, and Canon's ovf sim evfs are good enough to compete, and dont suffer from parallax recompose issues that the Fuji x100 ovf user has to still contend with....

Even so, the old powershots had functional optical viewfinders, and I'd love to see them reintroduced as well, only bigger and with some parallax correction. Today's autofocus is mostly good enough for a pleasant point and shoot experience without seeing the af points imo...
Upvote 0

Head Turning Canon Tilt-Shift Optical Designs

As an owner of all their tilt shift lenses, I gotta say that Canon NEEDS a 35mm tilt shift lens so badly.
You can put an EF 1.4x TC behind the TS-E 24mm, and you'll have a 34mm f/5 tilt-shift lens. The IQ remains excellent. Note that the presence of the TC will not be recorded in the EXIF data.
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,434
Messages
973,288
Members
24,791
Latest member
Moonghost

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB