Converting RS-485 to RS-422 using optical extender with SDI Video transmission

Hello, I am currently using a Questtel SDI-over-fiber extender with RS-485 data for serial control. I have recently switched to a Canon CR-N300 camera, which provides an RS-422 interface for control. Given the differences between RS-485 (2-wire, half-duplex) and RS-422 (4-wire, full-duplex), I would like to confirm whether it is feasible to implement an RS-485 to RS-422 conversion within the signal path and maintain reliable communication over the existing fiber extender.
Specifically, can a protocol-transparent hardware converter be used in this scenario?
Any recommendations on compatible solutions for integrating RS-422 control over the current infrastructure would be greatly appreciated.

SanDisk Sounds the Alarm About Near Future Storage Price Hikes & Supply

I agree that CE will be affected for years, but for a different reason than the implied shortage. The continuation of the AI boom is dependent on continued financing and so far a lot of the money is flowing in a loop (or not flowing at all). Nvidia invests in an AI company and then the AI company agrees to buy Nvidia GPUs, but as you say, there is no power to run the beast. They hype causes gullible investors to throw money at the AI company and by association at Nvidia, which has a completely ridiculous market cap. The timeline is too long for investor patience to last, even if there is some magic application out there that could eventually produce enough revenue to fund the monster. When the house of cards collapses, the dot com bust will look like child's play and the ensuing recession will have an effect on CE for years to come. Take pictures and invest wisely.
I wasn't exactly intending to enumerate all the causes of the likely years-long implosion of consumer electronics.

I agree with the description of the AI "boom" as a venture capital scam, see here: https://pivot-to-ai.com/2025/08/23/...e-think-the-ai-bubble-keeps-going-until-2027/

And I think it will indeed keep going into 2027. If it was based on investment fundamentals in any way, it would already be over. It is not gullible investors exactly, but self-interested venture capital scammers (that's their only "innovation": endless fraud) AND plenty of idiots AND people just jumping on the bandwagon because the markets and institutional investors function on FOMO.

The memory and storage supply implosion right now is caused by AI "hyperscalers" (people hoarding chips for datacenters that aren't built and for which there is no profitable use) buying out the entire supply of memory manufacturers - there are only 3 meaningful manufacturers on earth for RAM, which was already a very corrupt cartel. When AI collapses, the likes of Micron will still have no consumer supply, so prices will stay elevated for some time (and they will try to keep them up even when supply increases as there is no competition).

"Crucial" is Micron's consumer business, which they've ended because they're making so much money on datacenter HBM, which is not usable for anything else (similar to crypto mining chips, which were sold to many of the exact same people pushing AI).

Smaller electronics retailers and product lines will be crushed because with DDR5 RAM at 5x price vs. a year ago and fast SSD storage at something like 3x, a lot of consumers simply stop buying certain things entirely. As I said the other day, I'd have bought a 2nd 4TB external SSD the other day, but it has doubled in price. It's something I could use, but will get around until I have absolutely no choice.

Anyways yes, the recession from the AI crash will also further implode consumer demand and buying power, added on top of the tariff nonsense and the monumentally stupid imperial ambitions in the middle east. Everything will be worse for consumers for a long time.

Reference material/comments:
Here's a more recent article on the bubble, the timeline, the years required to rebuild supply lines, and "hyperscalers" buying more chips than they can use purposefully: https://pivot-to-ai.com/2026/03/27/the-ai-bubble-and-the-global-polycrisis/. Ed Zitron has dug into the numbers a lot, and only 1/3rd of claimed data centers are actually being built: https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-ai-industry-is-lying-to-you/.

OpenAI shut down its Sora video slop model the other week; of course, video models are the pinnacle of setting money on fire. They still only make worthless memes, but they cost astronomically more to run than text or still image generators. This is one of the first real cracks in the glass.

I think the "Subprime AI crisis" analogy is a good one (Ed first brought it up in 2024, but his most recent article breaks down a ton of numbers here: https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-subprime-ai-crisis-is-here/).
Upvote 0

The Canon RF 14mm F1.4L VCM is Right Around the Corner

Just collected my copy of the 14mm 1.4...quick brick wall test and can confirm (corrected) straight lines are very straight and corners look good at 1.4 (except for noise due to brightening of the corners via correction).

Flatter field and sharper corners wide open compared to my Sigma 14mm 1.8 (which itself was a very good copy tuned by a tech at Sigma Japan).

If only I had this lens when I went Aurora chasing in Norway end of last year lol.

Hopefully head out over the next few weeks to get some Milky Way shots if weather and time allows...
Upvote 0

Canon Looking at New RF-S Prime Lenses for APS-C, Including an RF-S 10mm F2.8

Given that there already is the 28mm pancake lens for RF there is little hope for a pancake in a similar range as RF-S I guess.
28mm is too long for my personal taste so I would have prefered a 24mm pancake as well.
I should clarify: I'd like an RF-S pancake lens equivalent to a 24, 28 or 35mm FF.
Upvote 0

Cover Cap for removed tripod collar mount on 24-105 Z / 70-200 Z ?

...am I the only one bothered by this unfinished, sharp-edged mounting point? :unsure:
It's never been a nuisance for me, never actually thought about it until seeing your post. The edges do have some rounding, and don't feel sharp against my skin. I'd really have to work hard to scratch myself.

I can see how that would scratch up some delicate surfaces, though. Or even becoming annoying when hand holding. But you can simply turn the collar, so the mount isn't sitting against a surface or resting in your hand.
Upvote 0

R5 Mark II vs BMPCC 6K G2 - dynamic range, aspect ratios etc

- Interface
The 6K2 has amazing menu and overlay. The Canon has good menu that work well for the amount of options that a photo camera has, but very very poor overlay placement. The items are not even aligned, and sometimes they get on top of the image for no reason. Why? I have no clue. It's really something that they should work on because it looks so stupid besides the fact that it can impact operations.

- Aspect ratio
There is a lot to unpack here. The origin of this whole issue is not Canon side, but you would be right to hate on them anyway because they only give this option. So, the digital specifications for video are bonkers. With digital, if you change the aspect ratio, the height stays the same. With 35mm, it is the opposite. Why? I don't know, and for me it doesn't make any sense. So for Canon you start from a 4K full DCI weird aspect ratio that is not even 1.85. You don't get any other aspect ratio in camera. You want something else? You have to crop in post. Basically giving a crop factor to your lens. It is so so bad. On the 6KG2 you also get a single aspect ratio, but at least it is a higher 16/9. You get so much more image. Standard digital specifications do not make any sense, and it's the whole reason why today everybody is looking forward to open gate. It's not to take out tiktok videos from a normal video. It's because the default and only aspect ratio sucks. The solution is pretty straightforward. Since most people are not delivering for cinema, manufacturers should just give us more aspect ratios that do not conform to standards but have higher pixel counts on the vertical side. Imho it is vastly better to resize than to have a crop factor. The non conform 6KG2 feels much better.

- Sound
XLR vs jack connector. Obviously one is better than the other. But is it a significant difference? I am not an audio expert, and it sound like I can get a very similar audio with jack. XLR is locked, but I don't think that you are going to pull the cables by chance that often, if ever. The truly good mics are all XLR obviously, but are you going to want to connect those to a camera instead of an external recorder? I don't think so. And I love the low profile of the Sennheiser MKE 440. What Canon could do on the next camera is implementing 32bit float audio recordings to avoid clipping at any cost, which a lot of manufacturers have already done. It shouldn't be that hard. But the 6KG2 doesn't do that either, so for the sake of this comparison for me they are equal. I do not miss XLR at all

- Stabilisation
I didn't test this much on either camera. The 28mm I am using right now is stabilised so that's already great for me. The 6KG2 has data that Resolve can use, and pixel size to crop in. The R52 has IBIS. They both have their strength, but it is nice to have a baked in IBIS stabilisation available.

- Screen
While the 6KG2 is way bigger, and the overlays are better positioned and drawn, the extra brightness on the R52 was significant. But i could have gone confused with the settings. I should look back at it.

-Overheating, camera noises, battery life
Battery life seemed pretty similar. My test didn't focus on this specifically so don't take my word for it, but at the end of it I had almost finished one battery on both. You clearly have to buy multiple spares for both. Since it was still a cold day, I didn't get to overheat warnings on the R52, but it will happen on a hot day as reported on multiple reviews. For me this is a crucial hybrid tradeoff: if you want a real fan, don't look at photo cameras. Then there are camera noises, in my case those all come from the 28mm doing tracking autofocus. There is no lens at a decent price on RF. On a 6KFF I would probably get the new Sigma 28-70 which is fully quiet. This matters to me since I have the mic on top of the camera, but there is no solution given Canon policy that connects silent focusing to high quality and high price. Which I don't want to spend.


After all this testing I had a clearer picture in mind.
R52: very compact form factor and decent color quality that needs grading but cannot retain highlights.
6KG2: bulkier form factor with impressive dynamic range, ease of use, and color workflow.

So I have decided to try and sell the 6KG2. While I do not think that there is anything else that matches the value of what this camera can give, for my current usage, form factor is everything. I want to be able to go around with a camera and not care about focusing that much. I'll get by the awful aspect ratio and the clipped highlight. I hope that Canon will implement open gate on the Mark II and seriously improve the dynamic range on the Mark III. I beg people to stop writing that "current cameras are all great", because they are not! But the portability of them is irresistible. And while I am selling the 6KG2, I am still very interested in their new full frame model. Like I said previously in this review it has many significant upgrades: brighter screen (already present on 6K Pro), cfexpress, tracking autofocus, tighter l mount, open gate. For now I am satisfied with Canon hybrid. But if I'll ever shoot on less so run and gun scenarios, I'll definitely consider coming back to Blackmagic. Or maybe I'll not manage to sell the 6KG2 at a decent price, so I'll just keep it on a shelf most of the time and use it in those rare situations where I am sure I don't want autofocus and can tollerate the bigger profile.
Upvote 0

Canon EOS C50 Review: Almost the Perfect 7K Cinema Rig

I've used a variety of Blackmagics over the years. Under controlled conditions, with good lighting, they make a very nice image. I personally find their form factor though to be less-than-desirable for most field situations, and in uncontrolled settings the image can sometimes be not great.
I did some testing. I will post the review soon :)
Upvote 0

Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 Sports + Canon R7 = Complete Failure (works fine on R6/RP)

Neither was the weight. I tried to pick one up many years ago and had a shock. As a matter of interest, how do you handle this 3.7kg lens?

Carrying it around the sidelines attached to my monopod (I had to upgrade the tilt head from a Manfrotto 234 to an Oben VH-A30 to support the lens) and a gripped 7D Mark II attached to the lens was like carrying a bowling ball on the end of a stick. I typically held the monopod with my left hand with the lens facing rearward resting over my left shoulder while moving around. I had two other bodies on a dual harness with a 70-200/2.8 on one and either a 24-70/2.8 or 24-105/4 on the other.
Upvote 0

What We Expect Canon to Announce in the Coming Months

Changing the magnification affects the corners and edges the most, but it affects every point in the frame except the exact center to one degree or another. So does moving the entire camera and lens towards/away from the subject.
It still yields useful results. Otherwise focus rails would be pointless.
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,391
Messages
971,660
Members
24,748
Latest member
Will R.

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB