What’s a “realistic” lens that you’d like to see Canon make?

[JustAnotherCanonShooter]

15-35mm F2.8 L "NONE" IS

It'll be smaller, lighter, cheaper than the current 15-35mm F2.8L IS lens. I honestly don't need image stabilizer for such a wide angle lens, plus at its current iteration, it's too heavy, too bulky, and too pricy.

 

[Timedog]

100mm 2.8L with 2:1 magnification

 

[Berowne]

Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L IS USM.

I really like my old EF 200/2.8. It is fast, light and affordable (700€). A new version with IS in the price-range of 1000€ would be very nice. And it would be a great addition to my 85/1.4L IS

 

[Adrianf]

A lightweight, mid cost 400mm F4 L IS. I have the 100-400 but I only use it on 400.

 

[bsbeamer]

Would love to see an RF lens that includes a teleconverter that can be engaged or disengaged without physically removing a seperate extender/adapter. Believe there was a Canon patent for this awhile back.

 

[bgoyette]

Canon needs a "great" 50mm 1.2L lens for the the EF mount. A companion to the 35mm 1.4L II, and a competitor to the Otus and sigma lenses of that approximate length and girth. The RF version I'm sure is fantastic, but it won't work on canon's cinema line, or any of it's professional cameras. The current EF 50 1.2 is fine for internet bokeh queens, but we need something with less field curvature, less longitudinal CA, and better detail wide open.

 

[Deleted member 381342]

A lightweight, mid cost 400mm F4 L IS. I have the 100-400 but I only use it on 400.

Would it not be a new f/5.6?, given the 400 f/4 DO isn't overly cheep.

 

[Zeurg]

RF 100mm f/2 IS Macro 0.5x not too expensive

 

[efmshark]

RF 150-600mm f/4-6.3 IS

 

[AdmiralFwiffo]

I just picked up a 50mm f/1.0 (mostly as a collector's item). But with my luck, there's an RF 50mm f/0.87 L on the way.

 

[Graphic.Artifacts]

I’d like a set of sharp, compact, light and affordable travel primes. No IS needed now that we have IBIS. 24 through 85 and around f2 would be fine.

 

[Starting out EOS R]

Continue reading...

RF 28-300mm F4L or even f2.8
I tried this lens in the EF version and although heavy, is amazing so in RF format, I would think it would be pretty special and usable as a multi situation lens.

 

[Brossardois]

I would like a 50 to 60mm RF prime, flat field high resolution macro lens, f2.0 would be great as a nifty 50, f2.8 acceptable. No IS required (IBIS now included)

 

[thomic]

RF 85mm f/1.4 USM
RF 35mm f/1.4 USM
RF 300mm f/4 USM
RF 20mm f/2.8

 

[snowleo]

I would like to have two lenses:

1 equivalent to the 200-500 lens of Nikon (no 100-500 with an aperture 7.1 please!)
1 macro with higher magnification (2 x instead of 1 x)

That wouldn't be that bad.

 

[Dest]

Some more affordable TS lenses would be nice, or something wide and aspherical.

 

[Architect1776]

150mm or 200mm to 600mm USM IS L zoom with the best possible aperture for about $3000

Totally agree 150-600mm L Aperture matching Sigma otherwise it likely would be too large. But would have to be built to the mechanical quality of the EF 100-400mm L MII. Then add a 24-120mmL.

 

[Danglin52]

Lightweight RF 150-500 f4 w/integrated 1.4x TC. I would even accept f5.6 above 400 assuming the same IQ out to 500mm before you kicked in the 1.4x. I would also go 200-500 f4 w/integrated 1.4x TC (280-700mm). If not, put me down for the 500mm f4 DO.

 

[kingrobertii]

A remake of the 50mm f/1.0 would be awesome.

 

[Jurgen]

What about a lightweight 500 reflex lens such as the Minolta AF Reflex 500mm f/8

Minolta AF Reflex 500mm f/8 - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org