That is such an incredibly specialized lens I don't see that ever happening.non L tilt shifts. I want those for EF too, but since RF is the future I'll take them here.
-Brian
Upvote
0
That is such an incredibly specialized lens I don't see that ever happening.non L tilt shifts. I want those for EF too, but since RF is the future I'll take them here.
-Brian
I'm pretty sure that wide TS-E and compact are mutually exclusive. Then again, would a 24 f/5.6 TS-E be acceptable? How about a 17 f/8?TSE wides for architecture, very L in construction but compact and sharp as hell. Speed is a LOW priority.
I’d love to pull the trigger for a 50mm 1.2, but an L grade, compact 1.8 or 1.4 would be impossible to resist.
What's the obsession with F/1.2?? I'd much rather have a smaller, lighter f/1.4 lens than a heavier and larger f/1.2.
My wishlist is ...
1, 24mm pancake if that is possible
What's the obsession with F/1.2?? I'd much rather have a smaller, lighter f/1.4 lens than a heavier and larger f/1.2.
Why would you carry it on your back? Just use the damn thingI rented it for a wedding and have had a bad back since
These two zooms would be my preference for landscape work. The 2.8 versions are awesome, but not needing that speed or the cost of a faster lens, in addition to preferring lighter versions.15-35mm f/4L IS USM zoom or 15mm f/2 IS prime
70-200mm f/4L IS USM
28 is a lot more practical than 35 and 85 is a tiny crop away from 70..Dream lens = 35-85mm f2 that would be my one and done lens!
Typo: 420-700mm.Hey, I want the Canon 100-700 you mention. Where can I get that bad boy? The current RF 100-500 is just a bit slow on the long end at 7.1 and put a 1.4x TC on it and you are at a whopping f/10. That is pretty limiting unless the light is really good. I would love to see a RF 200-600 5.6.
Vivitar made a 35-85 f/2.8 lens for the Canon FD mount in the late 1970's. That lens largely weaned me off primes until I started photographing bands in poorly lit clubs. Then f/2.8 at ISO 800 just wasn't good enough.Dream lens = 35-85mm f2 that would be my one and done lens!
Its probably a bit subjective. I'm in the wedding game and shoot wildly different subject. I also offer large print products so cropping isn't really a solution. I'm the biggest fan of 35mm/85mm combo, so to have just one lens to achieve this with everything in-between would be great.28 is a lot more practical than 35 and 85 is a tiny crop away from 70..
I have cropped my 28-70 to a 600mm f/18 and it’s still fine
I was not aware! That'd be a cool lens to source, if not for anything else the novelty of it.Vivitar made a 35-85 f/2.8 lens for the Canon FD mount in the late 1970's. That lens largely weaned me off primes until I started photographing bands in poorly lit clubs. Then f/2.8 at ISO 800 just wasn't good enough.