tron said:Maybe it's because you imported Raw files to LightRoom and used LR to make a jpg and you didn't use Canon's jpegs out of the box. Don't worry. Just check the histogram and shoot to the right.paolotaverna said:were taken into LR with default adobe profile and exported in jpg
Sorry but you said it in reverse. High shutter speed is the oposite of Long Exposure (= Very low Shutter Speed = many seconds) that is shown in the article you mentioned.Dwight said:Your SS were at 1/1600 and 1/2500. Unless you have a valid reason shooting at those speeds, IMHO, the fast SS was the undoing of those images (not the camera nor the sensor per se). Images in general get a lot of random noise when exposed at high SS and high ISO. http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/image-noise.htm
Hey tron! I'm sorry, but I don't see how I had my original statement in reverse. paolotaverna's EXIF show that he was shooting at 1/1600 and 1/2500...equals fast SS (aka short exposure) as I've said, random noise, per linked article, is caused by short exposure (equals less light reaching the sensor) and High ISO. Hence, there was a bit of random noise in his first 2 images. paolotaverna was shooting with a 50L indoors in ambient lowlight. I had suggested for him to shoot with a slower SS (aka longer exposure), at the same high ISO, perhaps at 1/focal length, to let more light into the sensor and to address the random noise on his images.
Bottomline, I can't see how Canon's flagship camera should have a high degree of manufacturing differences as evidenced by the amount and quality of noise in our images.
Upvote
0