6 Photographers Asked to Shoot Portraits of one man, with a Twist

[Northstar]

I really enjoyed this short video so I thought I would share....from PetaPixel.

"Canon recently conducted an interesting experiment on the power of perspective in portrait photography. They enlisted the help of 6 photographers and asked them each to independently shoot portraits of a man named Michael. But there was a twist: each photographer was told a different thing about Michael’s background."

http://petapixel.com/2015/11/04/6-photographers-asked-to-shoot-portraits-of-1-man-with-a-twist/

 

[AcutancePhotography]

As an activity, this is mildly interesting. As an experiment, it is useless.

The photographers were told a story about the model and then asked to take a photograph that incorporated that story.

An N of 6 and they are making conclusions? If all six photographers came up with the same composition, that may be the start of a conclusion.. but they would need a lot more than an N=6.

But I guess these days anything can be passed off as either an "experiment" or a "study".

I do not think that word means what they think it means.

 

[Northstar]

As an activity, this is mildly interesting. As an experiment, it is useless.

The photographers were told a story about the model and then asked to take a photograph that incorporated that story.

An N of 6 and they are making conclusions? If all six photographers came up with the same composition, that may be the start of a conclusion.. but they would need a lot more than an N=6.

But I guess these days anything can be passed off as either an "experiment" or a "study".

I do not think that word means what they think it means.

What a coincidence. Your analysis of the proper use of the word “experiment” was also “mildly interesting” and “useless".

I thought the photographers did a great job of capturing a portrait of the person they thought they were photographing. Let’s just keep it that simple, ok?

The inmate and psychic portraits were especially good. imo

north

 

[Stu_bert]

As an activity, this is mildly interesting. As an experiment, it is useless.

The photographers were told a story about the model and then asked to take a photograph that incorporated that story.

An N of 6 and they are making conclusions? If all six photographers came up with the same composition, that may be the start of a conclusion.. but they would need a lot more than an N=6.

But I guess these days anything can be passed off as either an "experiment" or a "study".

I do not think that word means what they think it means.

What a coincidence. Your analysis of the proper use of the word “experiment” was also “mildly interesting” and “useless".

I thought the photographers did a great job of capturing a portrait of the person they thought they were photographing. Let’s just keep it that simple, ok?

The inmate and psychic portraits were especially good. imo

north

I didnt watch the video, but read the site, thank you.

I would have liked them to have tried out the resultant pictures on the public and perhaps give them the 6 (or perhaps more) categories, and see if they could match the photograph to the description. I didnt think much of the first picture personally - as a fisherman I would have thought you were more interested in his physical attributes - how the fishing has affected him. The others were far better.

For anyone doing portraiture and trying to tell a story, I think this article would be an excellent introduction. I remember a vaguely similar one of 6 photographers asked to take pictures of a war graveyard in the states. Their different takes on trying to portray it were very illuminating and informative.

thanks again for sharing.