7D vs 5D2???

[houston1852]

I'm sure this has been covered a dozen times before but I'm really struggling to make a decision. I want to upgrade from my T2I but I still plan on using it extensively. I shoot mainly wildlife, old buildings, anything in nature. I currently own a canon 10-22, 24-70v1, 100-400L and 1 of my favorites, the 100 macro. I love the extended reach of having a crop sensor so I was leaning towards the 7D (although I do not shoot sports). I think all of these lenses minus the 24/70 tell me to go 7D. I think I would miss that extra reach if I went with the 5D2, but I do like the thought of better low light capabilities. I feel I'm a little limited on the crop sensor with my 24-70 but I can always back up. I was discussing my dilemma with a friend and he suggested a 5D2 with a 1.4 extender. Would that somewhat equal out the reach id be losing by switching to full frame? I would love any help on this.

 

[RLPhoto]

The 5D2 for wildlife is fine as long as it isn't birding but you will miss the extra reach. The 7D is a much better choice but I feel like its a bad time to buy a 7D. The 7D2 feels like its right around the corner and you could always make due with the t2i.

 

[Marsu42]

I'm sure this has been covered a dozen times before

Indeed ... but I can understand that these decisions are not easy so asking again is tempting :->

Except for absolutely stellar tele primes extenders are for occasional use and not for "always on" because they heavily depend on the iq of the base lens - the 100-400L isn't a promising choice for this and it'll be f8 which has af problems (I can tell, I've got the 70-300L which is sharper). That's why most budget wildlife shooters who want tracking and fast fps are on the 7d - the alternative is about $5000-$10000 more.

Upgrading from the 550d->7d with the same sensor also doesn't seem that smart to me unless you get a very good deal ... better wait for the 7d2 or 70d with probably a better sensor that'll solve your problem.

Btw: You should get a Kenko 1.4x anyway for even on crop, it's very nice on the macro

 

[Loswr]

Upgrading from the 550d->7d with the same sensor also doesn't seem that smart to me unless you get a very good deal ... better wait for the 7d2 or 70d with probably a better sensor that'll solve your problem.

+1.

I'd also add that it's important to consider what you do with the images you capture. Do you print them large? Submit them to magazines or contests which have a minimum MP requirement for the final image? Here's the thing...if you take an image with the same focal length and lens from the same distance with the 5DII vs. 7D, then crop the resulting 5DII image to the framing of the 7D, what you'll have is an image with IQ that's pretty much a wash with the 7D. With minimal processing, the 7D image is a little sharper, the 5DII image has a little less noise - and of course, you can trade the sharpness for the noise and vice versa...a wash. Thus, the main difference is that with the 7D you have 18 MP, and with the 5DII you have 8 MP. If 8 MP is sufficient for your needs (~12x18 prints and smaller), then the 7D has no reach advantage. Where the 7D does have an advantage over the 5DII is in AF performance and frame rate. But...the 5DII will be slightly better than your T2i in terms of AF and frame rate. If you don't need to crop the image, the 5DII will deliver much better IQ and much better high ISO performance.

So...I'd say ignore the crop factor 'reach'. If the AF and frame rate of your T2i are good enough for your shooting, getting the 5DII is your best option. But if you feel you'd benefit more from better AF and a faster frame rate, the 7D is great.

 

[DCM1024]

I have previously owned the T2i (which I loved) and now own the 7D and 5D2. I found my 7D to be one stop better for ISO than the T2i, and would probably go with the 7D to get the faster frame rate for wildlife (or wait for a 7D2). I prefer my 5D2 to the 7D for the types of photos I shoot (portrait, boudoir, wedding plus some of 'whatever', but nothing requiring the FPS of AF capability of the 7D).

 

[EOBeav]

Thus, the main difference is that with the 7D you have 18 MP, and with the 5DII you have 8 MP.

Help me out here, neuro. My 5DmkII has way more than 8MP...it's 21.1. What do you mean by 8MP?

n/m, I see what you're doing. However, I usually don't crop my photos like that. If I need to zoom in, I either get closer to my subject or increase my focal length. Or both.

 

[Marsu42]

I found my 7D to be one stop better for ISO than the T2

... um, but, but, they have the same sensor?! And looking at sample shots the 7d is probably worse because it has higher banding due to the dual readout channels.

Thus, the main difference is that with the 7D you have 18 MP, and with the 5DII you have 8 MP.

Help me out here, neuro. My 5DmkII has way more than 8MP...it's 21.1. What do you mean by 8MP?

Let me interpret what our good Dr. Neuro is trying to say, it was a rather large textblock which tends to confuse people ... if you crop back the 21mp shot to match the 1.6x crop factor, then there are 8mp left - if that's all you need you're ok with ff over crop because the iq is similar in this case (sharpness vs iso noise). I hope I've got it right

 

[Loswr]

Thus, the main difference is that with the 7D you have 18 MP, and with the 5DII you have 8 MP.

Help me out here, neuro. My 5DmkII has way more than 8MP...it's 21.1. What do you mean by 8MP?

The 7D is a 'crop sensor' - that means it samples only a small portion of the FF image circle. That's the basis of the 'reach' argument for APS-C (red is FF, blue is APS-C):

If you crop the 5DII image down to the field of view of the 7D (e.g. crop the red image to the blue image, above), you'd be left with 8 MP of your original 21 MP.

 

[Loswr]

n/m, I see what you're doing. However, I usually don't crop my photos like that. If I need to zoom in, I either get closer to my subject or increase my focal length. Or both.

Right. But what if you're already shooting with a 100-400mm lens at 400mm, and if you walk any closer to the bird or wild critter, it will fly/run away? You could do what I did - get a 600mm lens to use on your FF camera. But buying a $13,000 lens to get a longer focal length is not a realistic option for everyone. 400mm is a pretty hard limit if you like autofocus, with the forthcoming exception of 560mm/600mm on the 5DIII (400mm f/5.6 with a 1.4x TC or 300mm f/4 with a 2x TC).. and even that exception is a lot more $ than the OP is talking about, from what I can tell, since the 5DIII was not on the table for discussion.

 

[gmrza]

I'm sure this has been covered a dozen times before

Indeed ... but I can understand that these decisions are not easy so asking again is tempting :->

Except for absolutely stellar tele primes extenders are for occasional use and not for "always on" because they heavily depend on the iq of the base lens - the 100-400L isn't a promising choice for this and it'll be f8 which has af problems (I can tell, I've got the 70-300L which is sharper). That's why most budget wildlife shooters who want tracking and fast fps are on the 7d - the alternative is about $5000-$10000 more.

Upgrading from the 550d->7d with the same sensor also doesn't seem that smart to me unless you get a very good deal ... better wait for the 7d2 or 70d with probably a better sensor that'll solve your problem.

Btw: You should get a Kenko 1.4x anyway for even on crop, it's very nice on the macro

I agree with the view to avoid buying another crop frame camera, if you already have one of the bodies which has an 18MP sensor. All the indications are that Canon's crop sensors are due for a refresh next year, so if you want to stay on crop, it may be better to hold out for one of the new bodies coming out next year.

Apart from hopefully having a better sensor, the replacement for the 7D would have better integration with some of Canon's latest accessories, like the Speedlite 600-EX-RT - for instance, only bodies of 2012 vintage or later integrate 100% with the use of the colour-correction gels supplied with the 600-EX-RT. The 7D also requires a USB cable connection to integrate with a GPS receiver. - If any of these features mean anything to you, it may be another reason to wait.

 

[aznable]

I'm sure this has been covered a dozen times before but I'm really struggling to make a decision. I want to upgrade from my T2I but I still plan on using it extensively. I shoot mainly wildlife, old buildings, anything in nature. I currently own a canon 10-22, 24-70v1, 100-400L and 1 of my favorites, the 100 macro. I love the extended reach of having a crop sensor so I was leaning towards the 7D (although I do not shoot sports). I think all of these lenses minus the 24/70 tell me to go 7D. I think I would miss that extra reach if I went with the 5D2, but I do like the thought of better low light capabilities. I feel I'm a little limited on the crop sensor with my 24-70 but I can always back up. I was discussing my dilemma with a friend and he suggested a 5D2 with a 1.4 extender. Would that somewhat equal out the reach id be losing by switching to full frame? I would love any help on this.

a 1d mark iii would a better upgrade path

 

[Marsu42]

Apart from hopefully having a better sensor, the replacement for the 7D would have better integration with some of Canon's latest accessories, like the Speedlite 600-EX-RT - for instance, only bodies of 2012 vintage or later integrate 100% with the use of the colour-correction gels supplied with the 600-EX-RT.

That's the first time I've heard that's an issue, and many 600rt users wrote that Canon's gels are crap anyway and use other gels - which aren't calibrated even with the newest and shiniest 2012 bodies.

The 7D also requires a USB cable connection to integrate with a GPS receiver. - If any of these features mean anything to you, it may be another reason to wait.

Unless you want to log the direction the camera is pointing at just get a $40 external gps logger that lasts 24h w/o draining your eos battery, is very precise and keeps logging if the camera is off. And if you attach the data to the files later on you get the added value that with geosetter the real location names are written into the exif data.

 

[houston1852]

I'm basically looking for a new camera so I can carry 2 bodies with me to limit the amount of lens changes I have to make. I've had my t2I for maybe 3yrs and have always been happy with it. I've just recently gotten more into it as a more serious hobby. I bought all of those lenses last spring. I just figured as my skills gradually improve and I want a 2nd body anyway I should try to upgrade on it (I have a few friends who never shoot outside of automatic yet they're using t2i's). The 5D3 is out of my price range. I'm thinking $2000 tops.

 

[EOBeav]

Right. But what if you're already shooting with a 100-400mm lens at 400mm, and if you walk any closer to the bird or wild critter, it will fly/run away? You could do what I did - get a 600mm lens to use on your FF camera. But buying a $13,000 lens to get a longer focal length is not a realistic option for everyone. 400mm is a pretty hard limit if you like autofocus, with the forthcoming exception of 560mm/600mm on the 5DIII (400mm f/5.6 with a 1.4x TC or 300mm f/4 with a 2x TC).. and even that exception is a lot more $ than the OP is talking about, from what I can tell, since the 5DIII was not on the table for discussion.

Got it. I guess it's all in what you need. My subjects are generally things that don't fly away (like creeks, waterfalls, and people), so I guess I won't be trading in for a 7D any time soon.

 

[EOBeav]

I'm basically looking for a new camera so I can carry 2 bodies with me to limit the amount of lens changes I have to make. I've had my t2I for maybe 3yrs and have always been happy with it. I've just recently gotten more into it as a more serious hobby. I bought all of those lenses last spring. I just figured as my skills gradually improve and I want a 2nd body anyway I should try to upgrade on it (I have a few friends who never shoot outside of automatic yet they're using t2i's). The 5D3 is out of my price range. I'm thinking $2000 tops.

What kind of glass do you have? When I was still shooting with a Rebel, I filled out my focal length needs with Canon L lenses. Only after that did I improve my camera body by moving to a 5DmkII.

 

[colvinatch]

I have extensive experience with both cameras, I love the 5D for it's full frame. where a 50mm lens acts like a 50mm lens as an old film shooter, I'm home. Also the low light ability of the 5D is AMAZING. Having said that I also love the 7D and feel that in many ways it is a superior camera, better, faster autofocus, excellent image quality, very fast frame rate. If I had to chose between the two (thankfully I don't) for everyday shooting I would pick the 7D over the 5D.

I love the extra reach and the frame rate and the low light ability of the 7D it is not that awful although not as great as the 5D. I Use my 5D as more or less a studio camera and for portrait shoots. I use the 7D for everything else. Having said all this, I would hold off on purchasing the 7D for a couple of months as the 7D mark II is right around the corner, the release of that camera will drive the price of the 7D down a couple of hundred (both new and used) and you may like the features of the 7D mark II over the original 7D. My 2 Cents.

 

[Loswr]

Use my 5D as more or less a studio camera and for portrait shoots. I use the 7D for everything else.

Interesting perspective. I should ask - you state 5D, do you mean the original or the Mark II? Personally, I had the 7D for a while before getting a 5DII, and after that the 7D was relegated to birds/wildlife only, with the 5DII used for ~85% of my shooting, despite it's shortcomings on AF.

 

[CharlieB]

I've got both.

I've HAD Rebel/XT, Rebel/XTi, then the 5Dmk2, then 7D.

My "plan" was always to go FF, so I specifically limited my EF-S lenses to the kit lens, and nothing else.

The 5D2 does it for me... could use better low light, but its WAY better than the 7D, or Rebels I had. I love available dark, but learned to shoot within the constraints of film, say to ISO 1200 or 1600 or so, but using fast lenses close to, or at wide open. Can't say if that works for you....

I ended up getting the 7D as a compliment to, not backup for, the 5D2. I shoot people, events... and the 5D2 is right there, works as I want it to, gives the quality I want. My other passion is birds... the 7D does it. It loses some quality, gets some reach, and has the speed and AF tracking that the 5D2 doesn't have. Different tools for different jobs. Both are value priced right now.

 

[colvinatch]

5D Mark II I should have been more clear

 

[papa-razzi]

I own a 7D and love it. However, sports is 80% of my shooting. I had an XSi prior to the 7D and was quite happy with the image quality, but it just didn't cut it for keeping up in the gym with volleyball or basketball. I bought the 7D for the AF, FPS, and it had a stop higher ISO than my XSi.

I personally find the IQ of the 7D a bit dissapointing when shooting in low light and high ISO (above 800). High ISO in daylight is much better - it seems to be the combination of low light and high ISO. Other than that I have no complaints at all with the 7D.

If I was shooting what you described, I wouldn't get a 7D. I don't see an advantage that the 7D would give you over your current camera for what you shoot.