So now all i need is to find someone to lend me their 24-70, 35L, 85L, 100L Macro and 135L.
I really do appreciate all of the advice. I think i'll stick with the 40 pancake and 50 f1.8 to handle their respective focal ranges for now. The 40 is really quiet. I also tend to have the 22 f2 mounted to my EOS M which will make for a decent 35 f2 sollution (and second body).
I think you've talked me out of buying the 50 1.2L at least as an initial purchase. I may rethink the Tamron 24-70 VC vs the 24-105 F4 - this is especially after seeing the actual amount of light transmitted through the Canon (closer to f5). I am very inclined to get the 100L Macro now however. Has anyone used the Non-L 100 Macro in an low light portrait/closeup context? At $500 it would be a less expensive add to the kit.
I really do appreciate all of the advice. I think i'll stick with the 40 pancake and 50 f1.8 to handle their respective focal ranges for now. The 40 is really quiet. I also tend to have the 22 f2 mounted to my EOS M which will make for a decent 35 f2 sollution (and second body).
I think you've talked me out of buying the 50 1.2L at least as an initial purchase. I may rethink the Tamron 24-70 VC vs the 24-105 F4 - this is especially after seeing the actual amount of light transmitted through the Canon (closer to f5). I am very inclined to get the 100L Macro now however. Has anyone used the Non-L 100 Macro in an low light portrait/closeup context? At $500 it would be a less expensive add to the kit.
Upvote
0