Can we have a 16-35 2.8L II review next please?

[candyman]

In my opinion we need a fast replacement for the 17-40L and 16-35 II L with an image quality like the 24-70 II L.

And that would be 12(14)-24 f/2.8?

Replacement of 16-35 II L = 16-35 III L
12(14)-24 f/2.8 = new lens (welcome of course but still new lens, not a replacement)

Some people replace their 16-35 2.8 II with a 12(14)-24 f/2.8. For them, that's a replacement ???

 

[tron]

In my opinion we need a fast replacement for the 17-40L and 16-35 II L with an image quality like the 24-70 II L.

And that would be 12(14)-24 f/2.8?

Replacement of 16-35 II L = 16-35 III L
12(14)-24 f/2.8 = new lens (welcome of course but still new lens, not a replacement)

Some people replace their 16-35 2.8 II with a 12(14)-24 f/2.8. For them, that's a replacement ???

For them anything can be a replacement like a fixed wide angle lens :
For Canon it's certainly not