-
UPDATE
The forum will be moving to a new domain in the near future (canonrumorsforum.com). I have turned off "read-only", but I will only leave the two forum nodes you see active for the time being. I don't know at this time how quickly the change will happen, but that will move at a good pace I am sure. ------------------------------------------------------------
Canon Rumors - Your best source for Canon news, rumors and creators
Hi guys
At the moment I'm shooting all with my old Canon 7D -> Landscape with a Sigma 10-20mm, Macro with a 100mm IS USM and Tele with a 55-250 IS USM (Hopefully soon replaced by the new 100-40mm II.
I have a few bucks to spend but I'm not sure about where to spend it, so maybe you guys can help me with that.
Should I just upgrade my body to the 7D Mk2 or should I upgrade to a 6D and use the new 16-35mm f4. What would you do?
Are there any reviews with side by side comparison of both solution/lenses ? Like how much improvement do you gain for landscape shots? Honestly I'm pretty satisfied with the Sigma 10-20mm....
Thanks for your advice guys!
At the moment I'm shooting all with my old Canon 7D -> Landscape with a Sigma 10-20mm, Macro with a 100mm IS USM and Tele with a 55-250 IS USM (Hopefully soon replaced by the new 100-40mm II.
I have a few bucks to spend but I'm not sure about where to spend it, so maybe you guys can help me with that.
Should I just upgrade my body to the 7D Mk2 or should I upgrade to a 6D and use the new 16-35mm f4. What would you do?
Are there any reviews with side by side comparison of both solution/lenses ? Like how much improvement do you gain for landscape shots? Honestly I'm pretty satisfied with the Sigma 10-20mm....
Thanks for your advice guys!