dpc said:
Hi! I think the curve and flow of the track works better in portrait orientation. Just a personal view.
Hi dpc! Hi Click!
Thank you for your feedback. That's why I put both pics here.
I am a little undecided.
I see it similar but...
- I prefer the higher compression of the first picture.
That didn't work with the composition at the portrait orientation.
- And as I am not such a fan of pp I have to live with the cable channel down right that is a little bit distracting.
Maybe I should take the efford to erase it.
Anything else to say? Or are you fine with the rest?
Thanks again.
The matter of orientation or compression is, of course, entirely a matter of personal preference. I have no issues with post processing and would not hesitate to remove the cable channel if that produces a better picture. I suppose the issue of post processing becomes somewhat 'philosophical' and a matter of taste. I personally find that it can be pushed too far, but I see nothing wrong with adjusting colour, adding vignetting, cropping, adding textures and whatnot if that is what produces a picture that 'speaks' to you. I don't go with the idea that the camera must capture what is there before you in its pristine state. That pristine state is processed in camera after all and is therefore illusory in some sense, so pushing the process further in software external to the camera is a non-issue for me.
DPC
