SL1/100D vs EOS-M image quality

[sdsr]

(Apologies if this has been asked/answered before, but if so I can't find it.) I couldn't stand using the EOS-M but was impressed by its image quality as far as APS-C sensors go, somewhat better than the Rebel I briefly used for a while as a back-up. Can anyone who has used both in RAW mode say whether the SL1 offers similarly improved image quality? (There are lots of reviews of each around the web, of course, but the only comparisons I've seen are of out-of-camera JPEGs and thus useless.) Thanks in advance.

 

[Loswr]

Check TDP's ISO 12233 crops for the 200/2. They're shot RAW, converted in DPP with the same settings.

Edit: fixed. I blame my iPhone.

 

[sdsr]

Check http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=458&Camera=835&Sample=0&FLI=0&API=2&LensComp=458&CameraComp=812&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=2TDP's ISO 12233 crops for the 200/2. They're shot RAW, converted in DPP with the same settings.

Thanks! Rather helpful. Amusing lens/body combination....

 

[jrista]

Check http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=458&Camera=835&Sample=0&FLI=0&API=2&LensComp=458&CameraComp=812&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=2TDP's ISO 12233 crops for the 200/2. They're shot RAW, converted in DPP with the same settings.

That link is broken. The text "TDP's ISO 12233 crops" is actually included in the URL, when I don't think it should be.

 

[dppaskewitz]

I believe this is the correct link:

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=458&Camera=835&Sample=0&FLI=0&API=2&LensComp=458&CameraComp=812&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=2