Could you please elaborate? OK I understand about the additional AF capabilities but since you use 200 f/2 mostly I guess you are referring to something else...Viggo said:tron said:I am confused by this. You seem disappointed in 1DxII's sharpness but still consider it a HUGE improvement?Viggo said:scyrene said:neuroanatomist said:Viggo said:The second shot is also pretty heavily sharperned
To the point of sharpening artifacts, which to me is too much.
To me, the parts of the images that are in focus look perfectly sharp. But at 200mm f/2 with fairly close subjects, you have only a few cm of DoF, so subatantial parts of your images are outside the DoF and appear soft.
I agree that there seems no problem regarding sharpness in this image. I honestly can't tell what the OP means, but it's of course entirely subjective what is acceptable or not.
I'm just so used to the 1dx files and they are so sharp, but the total package the 1dx2 is a HUGE improvement.
Oh yes absolutely ! Sharpness is the one thing that's not quite as good, but everything else about the files and the camera as a whole is MUCH better.
Upvote
0