K
kkoster
Guest
I have to admit, I was starting to get excited about the prospect of the 5D Mark III coming out. I've loved my 5D Mark II and had a lot of commissions because of what it can produce.
However, I've always bemoaned the fact that it can't do 60p, at least 1280x720 like its newer little brothers. Looking at the latest rumours, it doesn't appear Canon have addressed videographers who possess an appetite for achieving slower motion footage.
Seeing as though 5D Mark IIs are employed a lot in the music video production industry (where achieving higher frame rates is a must), getting some of their technicians to produce something really cool like 1920x1080p at 60fps (minimum), would give Canon another advantage over competitors instead of concentrating on the multi-megapixel war.
I think if it doesn't at least do that (1920x1080p at 60fps), I'll be sticking with my mark II and maybe buy a 550D for my slo mo work.
However, I've always bemoaned the fact that it can't do 60p, at least 1280x720 like its newer little brothers. Looking at the latest rumours, it doesn't appear Canon have addressed videographers who possess an appetite for achieving slower motion footage.
Seeing as though 5D Mark IIs are employed a lot in the music video production industry (where achieving higher frame rates is a must), getting some of their technicians to produce something really cool like 1920x1080p at 60fps (minimum), would give Canon another advantage over competitors instead of concentrating on the multi-megapixel war.
I think if it doesn't at least do that (1920x1080p at 60fps), I'll be sticking with my mark II and maybe buy a 550D for my slo mo work.