The 10 Most Important Canon EOS Digital Cameras of All-Time

[Canon Rumors]

Over the last little while I have been going down some historical digital camera development rabbit holes. I have been around for most of the evolution of digital ILC cameras when I started out with the 300D in 2003. This website has also contributed to perhaps knowing more than one should about Canon camera models […]

See full article...

 

[AlanF]

I've owned 5 of your top 10: 300D; R5; 70D; 7Dii; EOS M; and the Dishonourable Mentioned 5DSr. And, I still have the 300D alongside my R5ii, R5 and R7. If I had to keep one MILC and one DSLR it would be the R5ii and the 5DSr. Once I got the 5DSr, I sold my 7Dii and 5Div. The 5DSr gave by far the best IQ, outresolved the 7Dii and had better AF than it, albeit not its burst rate. I've had some of my best bird shots, including BIF with it as well as landscapes. It took the R5 for me to sell it. Here's my favourite from the 5DSr with the EF 100-400mm ii.

 

[DhlcadR6]

I would swap 40D and R1 out for R6 and M50. M50 is showing Canon can make a well spec&relatively cheap mirrorless.

And R6 deserves more respect than it has now, as it is crucial along with R5 to stop most of the mid range Canon shooters jump to Sony(or other brands). Nikon did a huge mistake of making Z6ii Z7ii as a lame update. Z9 Z8 somewhat came out too late and not for the enthusiasts. Z5ii Z6iii are ridiculously late to the party.

Imho 6D R8 5Ds/5Dsr are honourable mentions.

 

[Canon Rumors]

I've owned 5 of your top 10: 300D; R5; 70D; 7Dii; EOS M; and the Dishonourable Mentioned 5DSr. And, I still have the 300D alongside my R5ii, R5 and R7. If I had to keep one MILC and one DSLR it would be the R5ii and the 5DSr. Once I got the 5DSr, I sold my 7Dii and 5Div. The 5DSr gave by far the best IQ, outresolved the 7Dii and had better AF than it, albeit not its burst rate. I've had some of my best bird shots, including BIF with it as well as landscapes. It took the R5 for me to sell it. Here's my favourite from the 5DSr with the EF 100-400mm ii.

View attachment 227521

I hated the cameras because of the sensor. It felt 10 years behind what Nikon was doing with the D8xx and those were also better cameras in almost every other way too.

Noticeable with the eyes how crappy the dynamic range was, especially in the shadows.,, and I'm not a DR evangelist. Anything with any level of dark to it looked terrible and printed terrible. There were no real software options that could clean them up at the time.

Resolving power was way too restricted to the lens that was on it. There was a lot of lenses in the EF lineup that were never going to do much with the added resolution, especially Canon's wide angle offerings.

These were half-assed cameras to get more margin out of the 5D4. I really haven't met anyone that liked them, including landscape shooters. Why anyone would have bought one of these over the 5D4 is beyond me.

 

[AlanF]

I hated the cameras because of the sensor. It felt 10 years behind what Nikon was doing with the D8xxx and those were also better cameras in almost every other way too.

Noticeable with the eyes how crappy the dynamic range was, especially in the shadows.,, and I'm not a DR evangelist. Anything with any level of dark to it looked terrible and printed terrible. There were no real software options that could clean them up at the time.

These were half-assed cameras to get more margin out of the 5D4. I really haven't met anyone that liked them, including landscape shooters. Why anyone would have bought one of these over the 5D4 is beyond me.

I shot a Nikon D850, with the 500/5.6 PF, alongside the 5DSr with 100-400mm ii for a year. The D850 knocked the spots off all Canon DSLRs, for both IQ and AF, but I was still happy to take out the 5DSr when I needed a zoom as Nikon couldn't match the 100-400mm ii.

 

[GirlsAreBeautiful]

I sold the 5d2 when I bought the 3, such a great camera, I look back at it with fond memories but I am happy it found a new home...