Is Vistilen the Next Third-Party RF Lens Manufacturer?

Last updated: April 2, 2026 10:06 am

Published: April 2, 2026

2 Min Read

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here's how it works.

A few weeks ago it came to our attention that a new camera lens brand Vistilen was going to be launched autofocus lenses for the RF mount for both APS-C and full-frame sensors. Like most of the world, I had never heard of the brand, but it was somewhat interesting.

Who is Vistilen?

It looks like Vistilen is Meike, as the lenses we have seen look identical physically. Why would Meike have another brand? I have no idea, but we have seen it before with Samyang and Rokinon.

According to Photo Rumors, Vistilin plans to release a large range of autofocus lenses for the RF mount.

Vistilen 33mm f/1.4 APS-C
Vistilen 55mm f/1.4 APS-C
Vistilen 35mm f/2 full-frame
Vistilen 50mm f/1.8 full-frame
Vistilen 55mm f/1.8 full-frame
Vistilen 85mm f/1.8 full-frame
Vistilen 85mm f/1.4 full-frame

From what I can tell, all of these lenses exist under the Meike brand for Sony's E-mount. I have no idea when we'll see an announcement from Meike or Vistilen in regards to RF.

As we can see from the image of the lens boxes below, all of the lenses look like Meike's offerings that already exist.

I did reach out to Meike about this, but never heard back.

Meike has teased autofocus RF-S lenses in the past

Back in October 2024, Meike teased that they were bringing an autofocus lens for crop EOS R cameras. Nothing ever became of it and we all moved on.

The only RF lens Meike currently sells is the manual focus RF 10mm F2 for APS-C, and they do still sell manual focus EF and EF-M lenses.

I don't imagine this is some way for Meike to get around Canon, they do have a name in the industry and would obviously receive a cease and desist from big bad Canon.

Go to discussion...

TAGGED:Meike spotlight Vistilen

SOURCES:Photo Rumors

Share This Article

ByCraig Blair

Craig is the founder and editorial director for Canon Rumors. He has been writing about all things Canon for more than 17 years. When he's not writing, you can find him shooting professional basketball and travelling the world looking for the next wildlife adventure. The Canon EOS R1 is his camera of choice.

Sigma 135mm f/1.4 DG Art Lens and Canon EOS R1

Canon Says it’s up to Sigma to Make Full-Frame RF Lenses

Amazon Prime Card Bonus Returns: 10% Cashback on Select Canon Gear

14 comments

mimbu
April 2, 2026 at 3:17 pm
Probably a shell company set up specifically to sell RF versions of the Meike lenses under a different brand. That way when Canon decides to sue the pants off them, there are no assets to go after. That shell company can just be shut down and another one will pop up. This might end up being the way the Chinese brands get their lenses onto RF.
- Reply
- 0
Bob Howland
April 2, 2026 at 4:44 pm
Regarding Meike, I bought one of their EF-to-RF 0.7x Speed Boosters about a month ago. It was $250 gamble, optically about as good as the Metabones. Both of them work extremely well with my EF Sigma 150-600 Sport zoom, converting it to a 106-426 f/3.5-4.5, including the DOF. The Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8 L becomes a very large and heavy 50-140 f/2.
- Reply
- 0
GirlsAreBeautiful
April 2, 2026 at 7:33 pm
No 28mm, sad.
- Reply
- 0
mawlki
April 2, 2026 at 9:59 pm
I'd applause Canon to indefinitely carpet bomb these leaches thoroughly with funny cluster munitions.
- Reply
- 0
David - Sydney
April 3, 2026 at 12:00 am
Probably a shell company set up specifically to sell RF versions of the Meike lenses under a different brand. That way when Canon decides to sue the pants off them, there are no assets to go after. That shell company can just be shut down and another one will pop up. This might end up being the way the Chinese brands get their lenses onto RF.
Brand identification/ marketing would be hard if phoenix legal structures were used.
It is possible that these lens would only be available within China where it would be harder for Canon to enforce any copyright/patent infringements.

Entirely likely that they use EF autofocus with RF physical mount.
The lenses don't have to have the fastest or quietest AF motors and still be competitive vs native lenses.
AF Meike lenses are relatively inexpensive eg 35-85mm f1.4-f2 models range from USD135-USD400 on B&H. The price would be cheaper within China.

We are seeing more hardware eg phones that are only available in China where the middle class market is becoming a big enough segment to support volume - especially at the price points vs native lenses.
Xiaomi, Vivo and Oppo all have china-excluding models for instance and these are not low end models.

For perspective, 2% of China's population is about 30m people who have >USD50k personal disposable income ie prosumers.
Add the number of professionals eg wedding photographers then the addressable market is larger.

Canon may also not go for them as it would mean more MILC body sales in China.
- Reply
- 0
rombe3jr
April 3, 2026 at 1:32 am
Finally found someone willing to pay the 30% fee?
- Reply
- 0
el peso
April 3, 2026 at 9:14 am
Vistilen? Why not Vilisten, Vinistel, Vilistine? Who names them that way and why? 🤦‍♂️
- Reply
- 0
Xpenelas
April 3, 2026 at 9:28 am
Looks like Vistilen it's the brand they would use to sell Nikon Z Mount and Canon RF lenses with licensed autofocus capabilities.
Like they are going to get better performance than Meike's counterparts crippled to meet E-Mount third party lenses limitations.
- Reply
- 0
AlanF
April 3, 2026 at 9:58 am
Vistilen? Why not Vilisten, Vinistel, Vilistine? Who names them that way and why? 🤦‍♂️
I would guess that it is a combination of Vista + Lens. The Chinese like having syllables from western words in their naming.
- Reply
- 0
Swurre
April 3, 2026 at 10:21 am
Another chinese brand...
- Reply
- 0
BlueBomberTurbo
April 3, 2026 at 11:44 am
Who cares. Just get those lenses out there. Meike optics are great, as is their AF (on Sony, at least).
- Reply
- 0
Daniel Wu
April 3, 2026 at 12:54 pm
Probably a shell company set up specifically to sell RF versions of the Meike lenses under a different brand. That way when Canon decides to sue the pants off them, there are no assets to go after. That shell company can just be shut down and another one will pop up. This might end up being the way the Chinese brands get their lenses onto RF.
They've been seelling those in south east asia for over one year.
- Reply
- 0
Daniel Wu
April 3, 2026 at 12:58 pm
Brand identification/ marketing would be hard if phoenix legal structures were used.
It is possible that these lens would only be available within China where it would be harder for Canon to enforce any copyright/patent infringements.

Entirely likely that they use EF autofocus with RF physical mount.
The lenses don't have to have the fastest or quietest AF motors and still be competitive vs native lenses.
AF Meike lenses are relatively inexpensive eg 35-85mm f1.4-f2 models range from USD135-USD400 on B&H. The price would be cheaper within China.

We are seeing more hardware eg phones that are only available in China where the middle class market is becoming a big enough segment to support volume - especially at the price points vs native lenses.
Xiaomi, Vivo and Oppo all have china-excluding models for instance and these are not low end models.

For perspective, 2% of China's population is about 30m people who have >USD50k personal disposable income ie prosumers.
Add the number of professionals eg wedding photographers then the addressable market is larger.

Canon may also not go for them as it would mean more MILC body sales in China.
On the exact opposite, Canon has a own sub company in China, which sues anyone trying to sell third party RF lenes. Nikon just did it to Viltrox.
- Reply
- 0
scyrene
April 3, 2026 at 2:14 pm
I'm not against third party lenses but I wouldn't commit any more than a minimal budget towards an unproven brand which is starting out with autofocus. Optics are all very well but I feel like AF is harder to succeed with.
- Reply
- 0