March 06, 2015, 05:02:09 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - edknuff

Pages: [1]
EOS Bodies / Re: Possible Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Spec Talk [CR2]
« on: February 23, 2015, 04:21:49 PM »
At 18 MP, for me, it is DOA.

EOS Bodies / Re: DPReview Interview with Chuck Westfall of Canon USA
« on: February 06, 2015, 03:52:13 PM »
NO improvement in DR, over the 5d3?

That is extremely disappointing... :'(

I'll probably skip it, unless the DR is through the roof!

EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 5D Mark III Replacement Talk [CR2]
« on: January 26, 2015, 08:27:34 PM »
<p>We’re told that the next EOS 5D will come in three different versions. Two of the cameras named “EOS 5Ds” would be the high megapixel cameras with a resolution of 53mp. One of the cameras would have an AA filter and other would not. We’ve heard this sort of thing before, <a href="" target="_blank">except the language used previously was one camera would have a low pass filter, and the other would not.</a> I do like the naming “EOS 5Ds”, as that may finally put to rest the “EOS 3D” moniker which has been around longer than this site has. There is also precedent on the “S” naming from the days of the “EOS-1D” and “EOS-1DS”.</p>
<p>The third camera would be an EOS 5D Mark IV, which would continue on the path of a lower megapixel event, sports, wildlife focused full frame camera. If this is true, I don’t believe all 3 cameras would come at the same time.</p>
<p>For the time being, there are no plans for a high resolution EOS-1 body style. However, expect the build quality of any 5D replacement to be top notch.</p>
<p>Personally, if they don’t make a high resolution EOS-1D style body, I do hope that a “5Ds” has the top plate of an EOS-1D.</p>
<p>More to come…</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

For me, I don't necessarily see a higher MP camera as necessary, unless Canon produces a sensor with a considerably higher DR.

I'd love to read your and others' thoughts on this...

10k?  Seriously?  Hell no!

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Card images failed transfer error on 5d3
« on: November 15, 2014, 12:54:11 PM »
I agree with everything mentioned here, however I came across this item a couple of years ago, but I can't guarantee positive results since I've luckily never had a problem with a card.
I hope it helps.

Third Party Manufacturers / Re: DXO uh-oh?
« on: July 29, 2014, 06:03:40 PM »
Personally, I'd love to have the Nikon D810, but only if I could put my Canon glass on it!
Nikon doesn't make the high quality glass that I need, for the lenses that I use.  For example: Canon TSE 24mm mark2.

EOS Bodies / Re: Patent: More DO Supertelephoto Lenses
« on: May 17, 2013, 11:50:50 AM »
Greetings from So Cal.
I've never heard of a "DO" lens.  Could you explain what it is and its purpose?
Thank you,

Lenses / Re: 40mm f/2.8 Wow what a lens
« on: March 27, 2013, 02:20:58 PM »
I believe it's a nice lens as well, for the price, however, I think it's a bit lacking in contrast on my 5d m3.

This is all very interesting, seriously, but y'all are making my brain hurt!

Pages: [1]