March 03, 2015, 02:46:49 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - papa-razzi

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 11
1
EOS Bodies / Re: Ron Martinsen Blasts the 7DII in his review
« on: December 23, 2014, 01:07:58 PM »
I really wish some of these people making such great generalisations would go out and buy one of these other more advanced cameras and see just how well it really does.  We've had the sensor thing and I think most agree there are other, better sensors out there but struggle to see quite why people see it as such an earth-shattering deal breaker in a camera of this type.

Go out and buy the latest Sony then, let's see how it copes with being battered, how long it lasts, how reliable it is, whether it can focus as well as the new Canon.  Because unless it can saying that Canon is over-priced or based on old tech is to miss the point.  It's innovative to put some new tech in a camera, it's actually bloody hard to make it reliable and resilient.  That's the difference,
Reliable and resilient? Ugh! You do realise that means your camera will be even more out-dated in a few years time? Why would you want a perfectly good camera that will produce great images for years, when you could be replacing it every year and living on the cutting-edge of tech? Get hip, daddy-o, and swing with the times!

Replacing quite expensive gear every year? I replace my gear when it's broken and have paid off, not sooner. Who needs cutting-edge technology, when previous generation is 95% as good as the new one? Unless you're a pro and can deduct new gear from taxes (which still isn't that easy and cheap) or a rich person, who don't need to think abot paying bills and feeding family, because his income exceeds majority of popuplation, I don't think there are that many people, than can afford spending for 5D3 or 1Dx every year. A new 5D body every year basicly means around 250 USD spend monthly. In my world, this is not a spare change to me, especially for a hobby and not a working tool.

Khalai, read Lintoni's quote again.  Sarcasm.  I think you missed that.

2
EOS Bodies / Re: Ron Martinsen Blasts the 7DII in his review
« on: December 20, 2014, 11:24:29 AM »
I have the 5D3/1D4/7D2 combination and I use them according to my needs.  Each has their advantages and disadvantages and not one will do everything exceptionally.  Find something that suits your needs and produces the images you want and who cares what others say.  You are the best judge of the equipment.  Rather than reading a myriad of reviews, rent the camera for a few days and decide.

Tiger - I'd love to hear your comparison of 1D4 vs 7D2.  I'm still considering one of these to replace my 7D.

3
EOS Bodies / Re: Ron Martinsen Blasts the 7DII in his review
« on: December 20, 2014, 10:47:20 AM »
If you don't want to upgrade to ff Imo the 7d2 is defiently worth the upgrade. Is it a perfect camera? No. It's very good though. Everyone has there expectations and that's fine but I think some people have unrealisitic expectations. I wouldn't let one persons review sway you after you saw so many favorable reviews.

I have a 6D, so the 7D is my sports camera

Personally, if I were looking to upgrade and existing Canon camera (and I am), I would wait until the next round of upgrades and hope that they got off their a** and delivered a worthy product. Or, what is more likely to happen, upgrade to a camera with some other logo on the head plate.

All my sports shooting is of my children.  They grow up pretty fast.  So, unfortunately waiting indefinitely is not an option.  If the differences are real, I can sell my 7D and the remaining difference in paying for the 7DII would be worth it.  I'd almost do it for the extra 2fps and AF without any other improvements.  The improved high ISO, even if marginal, is a bonus.

Thanks everyone for your comments.  They are helpful, as this is a community of people far more knowledgeable and experienced than I am.

Another slightly off topic question - should I sell the 7D now, or wait until the spring/summer.  I'm really down to football season where I would need the upgrade.  I wouldn't buy the 7DII until next summer regardless.

4
EOS Bodies / Re: Ron Martinsen Blasts the 7DII in his review
« on: December 19, 2014, 11:49:10 PM »
A couple of things I noted about the review which seem contrary to all other opinions were:

- Slight disappointment with the sensor performance: To be fair a lot of the early posts on CR were of the same view, some commentators (e.g. Scott Kelby) raved about it, most have now accepted its better than the pervious generation but not as good as perhaps they had wished or indeed the competition. However, the strange thing with this review is the implication that its worse than the 70D, which is the first review stating this, but also perhaps this is caused by the fact he is reliant on in Camera JPEG processing!

- AF system inaccurate: This is really strange, he states "I was disappointed with the high number of out of focus shots I got for such a slow moving activity " and also implies disappointment in focus accuracy, this is strange as virtually all other reviews have held this out as a strong point of the camera. One has to ask why, when others were absolutely raving about its performance and comparing with canons top of the line cameras/  For me this is a more important comment if I were buying - is there some merit in what he says and if so why does everyone else have contrary results here!


At the end of the day its an opinion, but remember he is a blogger and wants to drive traffic to his site as he can then get some $$$ for click trough's, controversial blogs do this - after would we have bothered reading it if it had been broadly neutral?

+1

5
EOS Bodies / Re: Ron Martinsen Blasts the 7DII in his review
« on: December 19, 2014, 07:26:16 PM »
Who's Ron Martinsen?  :o

Who is John Galt?

6
EOS Bodies / Re: Ron Martinsen Blasts the 7DII in his review
« on: December 19, 2014, 07:06:10 PM »
Good point Neuro.  I didn't pick up on the subtlety of that.

7
EOS Bodies / Ron Martinsen Blasts the 7DII in his review
« on: December 19, 2014, 06:21:08 PM »
I was getting ready to sell my 7D and pick up a 7DII in the spring.  Pretty much every review I have seen has been favorable.

Not so much this one.
http://www.ronmartblog.com/2014/12/review-canon-7d-mark-ii-oh-no-not-again.html

So, who is right?  Should I just hang on to the 7D, or upgrade to the 7DII.  I use this camera for sports shooting.  Night football games, basketball, volleyball - all could benefit from the  higher FPS and improved high ISO performance on the 7DII - if in-fact there is improvement in the high ISO performance.

Has anyone had both a 7D and 7DII?  What are your experiences?

Is Martinsen way off in his review?  His is know for being candid and speaking his mind - and he is a Canon shooter.  But he seems to be a lone voice with such a negative review.

8
Technical Support / Re: What kind of photo printer do you use?
« on: December 10, 2014, 08:17:59 PM »
I got a Canon Pixma Pro 9000 II for free w/ a rebate when I bought my 6D.  I was really excited about it.

However, it has always had a red color cast.  I have tried everything from creating my own profiles with a colormunki photo to having profiles made, testing out printer vendor profiles, various software, monitor calibration, photo papers, etc.  Countless hours of research and frustrations galore.  I know more about color management than now than I ever intended.  Still, can't get rid of the color cast.  If you can't match what is on the screen with some level of accuracy it kind of kills the joy of it.

It is also an ink hog.  I don't print much at all (see above) but when I do print it always seems one or more of the cartridges is running out.

I've turned to printing at labs.

I would still love to get all this sorted out and have the ability to do great prints on my own, but I'm not willing to pour the money into it and get a higher end printer, invest the time, etc.  It's not worth it to me.

For the quick and dirty stuff I just use my cheep epson all-in-one and it does just fine.

9
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: 6D vs 7D mark II
« on: December 08, 2014, 12:19:16 AM »
I have both a 6D and a 7D.  I love my 7D for everything except the high ISO noise - which is pretty bad.  When I first got the 6D it was really a step down in handling and especially the focus compared to the 7D.  It took me a while to get to like the 6D itself - I was spoiled by the 7D.  However, the IQ on the 6D was wonderful.

I use the 6D for pretty much everything except when I need action shots.  I had the 7D on the shelf for quite a while and recently pulled it out for football season.  Now I am GASing for a 7DII - but I wouldn't get rid of the 6D - for indoor & low light the 7D can't touch it.


10
Software & Accessories / Re: Two monitors vs ultra-wide one?
« on: December 08, 2014, 12:09:46 AM »
I have a two monitor setup.  One monitor is Landscape, the other in Portrait.  It is really nice to view shots taken in portrait orientation in a portrait oriented monitor.

11
EOS Bodies / Re: Am I the only one excited about the new 7D mk2?
« on: September 22, 2014, 11:29:32 PM »
Here is the thing for me.  The 7D is a great camera.  It does quite a lot for a very reasonable price - affordable to a large number of people.  I have used it for 4 years, to take track, volleyball, football, soccer, & basketball photos, as well as general shooting.  I have captured some awesome pictures.  The AF, once you really know how to use it and adjust the settings to your style, is very good.  The images are usable even in lower light.  Ergonomics of the camera are excellent.  Granted, in low light, needing a faster shutter speed for sports you push the ISO limits of the camera - but you still get shots you couldn't otherwise get - unless you spent significantly more money than the 7D costs.  My only wish was less noise at high ISO in low light - a lot to ask for any camera.  High ISO in good light wasn't that bad. 

The 7D II improves on the 7D in high ISO performance, AF performance, and FPS performance, among other things.  The price point has remained close to the same (comparing introductory pricing).  For what it does, and for the price it does it for, you are not going to be able to beat this camera.

Granted, if your focus is IQ and you largely use the center focus point, get a 6D.  If you want an awesome all-round camera with great IQ and very good AF, get a 5DIII (for much more $$).  If you want everything without much compromise on anything, get a 1DX for (substantially more $$).

For the price point, the 7DII provides a tremendous amount of value.  I believe this camera will sell quite well.

12
Lenses / Re: EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS versus EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS II
« on: August 27, 2014, 10:51:03 AM »
Thanks Everyone.
I think I'm going to sell my EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS and my 7D and get a 7DmII when it comes out. (if it isn't too crazy expensive)

I have a EF 70-300L and it seems to do the trick, at least for good light.  I will have football from now until end of November, and most of the games are daylight games.  (the little guys 11 years old)

Thanks again.

13
Lenses / EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS versus EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS II
« on: August 27, 2014, 12:39:15 AM »
I have a EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS I bought used to use for sports, but I found that the AF never really kept up, so I haven't used it much.  Do I have a bad copy, or is this fairly normal for this lens.  (This is all with a 7D)

Is it worth selling it and getting the EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS II ?  I have heard the image quality of the mark II is much better.  Is this lens any good for sports, or should I go with a prime instead?

Thanks!

14
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: The Unthinkable: Swapped out 5D3 for 6D
« on: December 03, 2013, 05:04:53 PM »
I'm looking at doing just the opposite.  I got a good deal on a Canon refurb 6D at $1,400 USD so I pulled the trigger, but I am seriously considering selling it and moving up to a 5DIII.

The 6D is great, but after having a 7D (still have) for 3 years I have a hard time getting adjusted to the AF system on th 6D.  I have ended up using the center point and reframing most of the time, because the outer points don't seem to provide coverage or struggle in lower light.

I thought I would be fine with the AF system on the 6D, and although I can get by on it, I really do miss the 7D AF system.

15
EOS-M / EOS M or Powershot S110?
« on: September 07, 2013, 12:17:45 AM »
I can get a powershot S110 or an EOS M for about $350 USD.

The question is, which one?

I want something for taking video where I don't have to manual focus (like on my DSLR).
I want something small for times when I don't want to carry the bigger DSLR around.  Ideally to fit in a pocket.

For those that have used both the EOS M and a Powershot S95, S100, S110 - which is a better solution?

The advantage of the S110 would be its size.  It will fit in my front pants pocket or shirt pocket.  But how good is the low light ability, or the image quality.

The advantage of the EOS M is better image quality, and if I get in a video taking situation where I need a long lens I have that option with the adapter.  However, I'm concerned how "pocketable" it really is - Especially with the 18-55 lens. 

I'd love some advice, as the S110 will be running out of stock prior to the S120 coming available for $100 more.  So I need to decide or lose the opportunity to go with the S110.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 11