1
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS not good for NASA?
« on: May 14, 2013, 07:14:23 AM »Aaaaaaaaaaand he's back - say thanks for the pics on our behalf, would you, Canuck?Already have. AND invited him to speak at my local camera club.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Aaaaaaaaaaand he's back - say thanks for the pics on our behalf, would you, Canuck?Already have. AND invited him to speak at my local camera club.
It makes me smile, all these rich people with expensive 5D3 cameras who don't want to pay for Canon batteries.Not fair, dude.
Forgot about this thread...seems a good place for an image from our son's first portrait session.Great portrait and congrats on the new addition. Fair warning, though. Ours started out all cuddly and cute like that too, but he's now 6'4" and 210 lbs. Something about feeding them after midnight or too many Flintstones vitamins... beware!
I don't have the intestinal fortitude/unlimited hobby funds to intentionally select the Cancel option on the replacement battery.
NASA uses Nikon because nearly every MF telephoto NIKKOR lens can focus beyond infinity.

.We just had a thread shut down for being "beyond stupid." That would suggest that posts must meet a certain intellectual level before proceeding to full forum discussion. What's the standard?