October 20, 2014, 05:07:46 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - lw

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5
Lenses / Re: Official: Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM Pancake
« on: September 17, 2014, 05:12:25 AM »
Whoa. Wasn't expecting the UK price to be that high! If the grey market can't get it closer to the US price then I think I will give it a miss.

I am hoping it is some kind of error.  I haven't seen a price quoted by Canon themselves so far in a press release, so the only thing to go on is the pre-order price that Wex, Park, et al, have set - which is uniformly £179.

Lenses / Re: Official: Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM Pancake
« on: September 16, 2014, 03:24:22 AM »
Can't believe the rip-off price Canon have set for this in the UK - £179 inc VAT.

We are used to paying pounds for dollars, which would have made it £149.
But pounds for dollars, and then VAT on top of that is a pure rip-off.

At current exchange rates the US price would be just £95 - so we are paying almost double.

It isn't the case with the new 24-105 STM, as that is only £479 vs $599, so without VAT (£400) that is much closer to the US price of £379

Why have they singled out the 24mm STM for such an extreme markup?

All they are doing is driving UK customers to buy grey market imports from the likes of Digital Rev - lets face it, there is not much risk importing a low cost item like this.

Lenses / Re: Official: Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM Pancake
« on: September 15, 2014, 09:42:57 AM »
I'll be having some of that, providing the excellent $149 doesn't translate into £200

And they will add VAT on top of that...  >:(

Never mind if they do, as such a simple, low cost lens will be a pretty risk free grey market purchase from the likes of DigitalRev.

EOS Bodies / Re: Patent: Dual Motor For Autofocus on STM Lenses
« on: September 12, 2014, 07:41:45 PM »
For the new 24-105mm STM perhaps?

Lenses / Re: A New Pancake Lens? [CR1]
« on: August 29, 2014, 06:00:17 AM »
According to Digicam https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fdigicame-info.com%2F2014%2F08%2Fef-s24mm-f28-stmef24-105mm-f35.html&edit-text=, it is an EF-S not EF lens

24mm F2.8 is a lens that rumor is flowing well recently, but it seems to be EF-S lens instead of EF apparently. The rumor, it is said that this lens become a pancake, but it is where you want to pay attention how to be degree smaller and lighter.

(via CW)

Landscape / Re: Mountains, Lakes and Rivers
« on: August 14, 2014, 05:36:16 AM »
Lake Garda, Italy

Early Morning stroll along the shore

by lozwilkes, on Flickr

Lake Garda from the mountains at Malcesine

by lozwilkes, on Flickr

On the mountains

by lozwilkes, on Flickr

EOS Bodies / Re: Patent: Dual Pixel Phase Detect AF While in AI Servo
« on: August 13, 2014, 07:03:04 AM »
Would be nice if this could be applied via a firmware update to the 70D.

If it is all in the algorithms, and not new hardware components, perhaps that is possible.

EOS Bodies / Re: Canon 70d center focus point -bug- problem
« on: August 07, 2014, 09:53:43 AM »
what people don´t seem to understand is that this has NOTHING to do with tolerances.

Others with the problem seem to suggest differently. e.g. http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showpost.php?p=17077451&postcount=1175 where he discusses the possible misalignment of AF elements.

the lenses in combination with the 70D behave fine when the working apperture is set to say f2.8 or f4.
sure the amount of error should be smaller then (greater DOF) but still visible.

and it does not happen when you don´t use the center AF point.

the fact that it only happens at wide open apperture, that no amount of AFMA helps, only the center AF is affected.... is what makes this issue so special.

But people with the same camera and lens combination, using it in the same way, don't have the problem.  It is a fault with individual cameras, not every camera.

EOS Bodies / Re: Canon 70d center focus point -bug- problem
« on: August 07, 2014, 08:43:56 AM »
when there is some kind of percentage of flawed cameras i call it a series issue.

And what is that percentage?

I reckon Canon have sold at least 10's of thousands of 70Ds. Probably 100's of thousands.  Canon have sold in excess of 5 million DSLRs since the 70D was released. Even if the 70D was only 1% of that, it would be 50,000. But the 70D is a top seller according to places like Amazon and BCN, so it is going to be more.

Meanwhile, how many have faults? Well 10's possibly 100's have stated they have a fault in forums and elsewhere.  i.e. a very tiny percentage. But as ever the silent majority who don't have faults don't post that fact.

It's a real bummer for people who have a problem with their camera, and Canon don't seem to be doing a good job of fixing it for them, or managing the situation.

But I find no evidence to suggest that a high percentage of 70Ds have this fault, and certainly no indication that it is some inherent design fault or firmware issue - otherwise everyone would be reporting it as we all have the same hardware and firmware.

I have tried every way I can to find this fault in my camera but it stubbornly refuses to mis-focus.  What I did find though was that every one of my lenses required some MFA on the 70D.

If there is a fault it is in the assembly process that appears to allow the build of misaligned cameras or the calibration routines are at fault,  and in the testing process for not spotting them before they leave the factory. 

Reviews / Re: 70D - I think I will keep it but . . .
« on: August 06, 2014, 03:22:03 AM »
Certainly worth MFA'ing your lenses as michealhodges suggests.

I have both the 18-135 and 55-250 STMs with my 70D too.  Both required a little MFA (around +3)  to get the best out of them.

Compare some carefully set up LV shots with the same OVF shots. If the LV ones are sharper, then you need some MFA.

Animal Kingdom / Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« on: August 02, 2014, 07:37:46 AM »
Hooded Vulture, at Hawk Conservancy Trust , Andover, UK

hctvulture by lozwilkes, on Flickr

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Live View Display blackout after shot? 70D
« on: August 01, 2014, 05:09:58 AM »
The 70D and X100S are quite different designs of camera of course.
The 70D is a DSLR, which whilst offering an improved 'live view' experience compared to most DSLRs is still optimized around the use of the OVF - particularly for action shots.

I don't think there is anything 'wrong' in what you or the camera are doing - It is just the way Canon DSLRs work and I guess it just doesn't conform to the experience you were expecting coming from a mirrorless camera.

Canon General / Re: When a Woman is Fed Up...
« on: July 28, 2014, 10:58:15 AM »
Is it only me, or does that camera look too damaged to have been simply thrown to the floor?

To break off the entire top of the camera housing would take some considerable force I would have thought.

She really would have had to thrown it quite hard I would think, not simply picked it up and dropped it.

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: London Walkaround
« on: July 03, 2014, 05:20:38 AM »
Currently in London being a good tourist and helping the global economy. Brought my Rebel SL1, EF-S 10-22, and EF-S 15-85 IS. Everything fits in a small shoulder and is a delight to carry around all day. Don't really need anything else and the IQ is more than satisfactory. Less is more???

What equipment would YOU choose for a week in London?

more than enough - for a tourist trip rather than a photography trip... if you get the difference

I am in London frequently.  I find just the little EOS M + 11-22mm if often more than enough - for a tourist

Great for shots in Museums

British Museum by lozwilkes, on Flickr

Great Court British Museum by lozwilkes, on Flickr

Or parks and open spaces

untitled-1834 by lozwilkes, on Flickr

and other 'interesting stuff'

Chez Michele London Borough Market by lozwilkes, on Flickr

Lenses / Re: Question for Reikan Focal Pro users
« on: July 01, 2014, 05:55:13 AM »
Not sure about 2 values for the same prime lens.

But for a zoom lens, the process is automatic.
Run FoCal with your lens zoomed fully out, and FoCal will know to set the Wide MFA setting.
Run it again with the lens zoomed fully in, and FoCal will know to set the Tele MFA setting.

(When it asks you if it is OK to save the MFA setting it does tell you whether it is setting the Wide or Tele setting)

Pretty simple really  :)
But not obvious, because they don't make it fully clear in the documentation.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5