May 25, 2013, 06:51:11 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Jan van Holten

Pages: [1] 2
1
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 7D Mark II Test Camera [CR1]
« on: March 29, 2013, 07:00:10 PM »
Canon has nothing to respond to Nikon in terms of sensors today.
And about  AF you're wrong, 1DX  for example has a greater speed but the accuracy is lower than D4 in a series of shots/time.

It helps in other words not to have a higher speed / second if the outcome is not  good as with the Nikon.

Ergonomics is a highly subjective view of equipments

Are you trying to compensate for something????

2
EOS Bodies / Re: What is missing from the 7DII specs
« on: March 29, 2013, 07:09:30 AM »
More AF points would be welcome, but even more important, make it a wider AF -area then on the 1DX.
That is my complain about the 1DX, I would love the AF-area more stretched. Imagine this area like a rectangle, then I'am  missing some points in the outer corners. That is based on my experience in the field.


The 1D IV and 7D are about tied for the broadest spread in both dimensions (relative to frame size). The 1D X has the same lateral spread as the 1D IV and 7D, and slightly less spread in the vertical dimension (about half a row shorter).

Basically, the 1D X is giving nearly the same spread (only the two points at the top/bottom of the 7D center column extend beyond the 1D X coverage), both have a point at the 'rule of thirds' intersections, and the 1D X rectangle's corners extend beyond the 7D's coverage, with the 1D X covering a larger area with a far more dense array.

I,ve just returned from a trip to Kamchatka, Russia about three weeks ago. I was there to photograph the mighty Stellers Eagle. Often I place the subject in the upper part of the image and then I, am missing the row on top. Especially when using the AI-servo mode and a moving subject. I all the time select a focuspoint wich is best suitable for the composition. With the MARK4 the problem was less often there, but I'll like the much better quality of the 1DX. And I,ll try to avoid cropping as much as possible. I know I,am a bit cocky, but making the picture without optimizing it by cropping is the sport for me. It,s a bit like the Russians do, why make it easy when one can do it also in a difficult way????/

3
EOS Bodies / Re: What is missing from the 7DII specs
« on: March 28, 2013, 07:04:18 PM »
More AF points would be welcome, but even more important, make it a wider AF -area then on the 1DX.
That is my complain about the 1DX, I would love the AF-area more stretched. Imagine this area like a rectangle, then I'am  missing some points in the outer corners. That is based on my experience in the field.
A much better iso performance then de 7D would also be very welcome. And of course a reliable and fast autofocus.

4
1D X Sample Images / Re: Any Thing shot with a 1Dx
« on: March 27, 2013, 04:40:58 AM »
1Dx 300f/2.8 V2, shot @ f/7.1 & 1/250th.
Mala Mala, Northern South Africa, March 2013
Lovely leopard shots! Could you describe how you took this one?

Spent 2 weeks in Northern South Africa at two Properties, Mala Mala & Londolozi, target of the 2 weeks was just Leopards. We were able toPhotograph 24 Different Leopards over the 2 weeks, in particular my plan was to Photograph Leopards at night with the 600EX RT. The Flash was used on a RRS Bracket, set to maul -2 & for 200mm using the 1Dx on the mentioned settings & the 300f/2.8. The trick here was to use only enough Flash to give some "fill" lighting, while utilising the Spotlight from another vehicle at night to throw just enough light on the Leopard to rim light the animal. Biggest issue was maintaining auto focus although the 1Dx was surprisingly good in this area, as long as Focus was on the area of the head that was lit from the spotlight, impossible to focus on the eye. Processed in LR4 for minor crop, Photoshop for some levels to ensure Blacks even, some sharpening in On One. Hope that helps.

That is very very good work and thinking. I call this a masterplan. You can plan something like this, but you get no quarantee. Two weeks with all togheter 24 leopard is also amazing. You' ve got some inside information I guess?

5
1D X Sample Images / Re: Any Thing shot with a 1Dx
« on: March 21, 2013, 03:43:23 AM »
1Dx
600mm f/9.0 1/1000 iso 400 case 1

Spectacular to see. One always hopes that when something happens like this you're not to close or with a to big lens. Is it a familiair location for Bald Eagle???

Jan

6
1D X Sample Images / Re: Any Thing shot with a 1Dx
« on: March 18, 2013, 04:24:25 AM »
My equipment had no problems at all. I've used a 1DX for most of the time and it worked flawlessly. I did not protect it although I brought a plastic cover with me to keep the direct wind of the camera. Also, when going outside we had no problems with the camera concerning cover. On the first day of the snowstorm the temperature was about minus 12 degrees Celsius en a windforce of 8 to 9 Beaufort. Visibility was sometimes not more dan 15 metres. The truck on the picture drove into a wall of 1.5 metres of snow because of that poor visibility. With some help it got loose and instead of choosing another route the driver just send the truck over de snow-wall. Only with a bit more care.
Altogheter, because of the circumstances I did not manage to get the Eagle shots I was hoping for ( low angle ). Photographing wildlife on the southern part of Kamtsjatka during winter demands to make it a longer project, but is a great adventure.  My other camera, a 1Dmark4 also worked well. Alle lenses used are L-lenses.

Sounds like an amazing experience. Being so remote like that and seeing such pristine landscapes must be awesome. How long were you there for?

I have often thought of going to Antarctica, Alaska, even parts of Iceland and outlying islands of New Zealand. So much to do, so little time....  :)

Hello,

The whole trip was only ten days of wich five days were spend traveling to Kamtsjatka or driving to the westcoast of the peninsula and back. If you want to travel to an arctic destination, it's quite easy to arrange it yourself or otherwise book a phototrip. There are plenty of these organised trips wich specializes on wildlife photography.
When you ae interested in going to a real remote destination, I have a contact in Russia ( touroperator ) wich ofers a trip to the Lena Delta. You will find there for example a Ross Gull colony. The accomodation that is available for us is very primitive and you spend a whole days sailing by boat to the iland. The whole comfort is very poor, but you stay in a remote place with a Ross Gull colony a 100 metres away.  The landscape is just flat, it's a delta. Renting a helicopter is very pricey nowaydays. A group of four is the maximum.

7
1D X Sample Images / Re: Any Thing shot with a 1Dx
« on: March 17, 2013, 05:28:42 AM »
Togheter with two others just returned from a trip to Kamtsjatka, Russia. The Russian touroperator told us that is was the first time that people from Europe came to the place to photograph the Stellers Sea-Eagle. I now understand why, the place is very inaccessible because there are hardly any roads. The meter of snow and the weather determines whether one anyway eagles sees. One week of stay also yielded two earthquakes and two heavy snowstorms. But fortunatly the Ural truck did it's job, what a hell of a truck. Unstoppable.

Wow! What an experience to have. How did your equipment hold up and what did you use to protect it? It looks very cold....

Love the seal shot, it looks like it is actually posing for the camera while pretending to be put off! The eagle shot is great too.

My equipment had no problems at all. I've used a 1DX for most of the time and it worked flawlessly. I did not protect it although I brought a plastic cover with me to keep the direct wind of the camera. Also, when going outside we had no problems with the camera concerning cover. On the first day of the snowstorm the temperature was about minus 12 degrees Celsius en a windforce of 8 to 9 Beaufort. Visibility was sometimes not more dan 15 metres. The truck on the picture drove into a wall of 1.5 metres of snow because of that poor visibility. With some help it got loose and instead of choosing another route the driver just send the truck over de snow-wall. Only with a bit more care.
Altogheter, because of the circumstances I did not manage to get the Eagle shots I was hoping for ( low angle ). Photographing wildlife on the southern part of Kamtsjatka during winter demands to make it a longer project, but is a great adventure.  My other camera, a 1Dmark4 also worked well. Alle lenses used are L-lenses.

8
1D X Sample Images / Re: Any Thing shot with a 1Dx
« on: March 15, 2013, 04:08:29 PM »
Togheter with two others just returned from a trip to Kamtsjatka, Russia. The Russian touroperator told us that is was the first time that people from Europe came to the place to photograph the Stellers Sea-Eagle. I now understand why, the place is very inaccessible because there are hardly any roads. The meter of snow and the weather determines whether one anyway eagles sees. One week of stay also yielded two earthquakes and two heavy snowstorms. But fortunatly the Ural truck did it's job, what a hell of a truck. Unstoppable.

9
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Questions about a 1d MK IV auto focus system.
« on: February 01, 2013, 05:56:34 AM »
First, in real world what I experience is the autofocus from the 1Dx observable better / faster then the MARK4. Recently I did shoot on a subject with the MARK4 and the 1Dx and had about 25% more keepers with the 1Dx.
The subject was a very fast moving bird that stood not still for a half a second. The autofocus of the 1Dx is really amazing, without a doubt. What I like about the MARK 4 is the larger area with autofocuspoints. It is more easy to select an autofocuspoint which match with the composition you create in a picture. Sorry for my English, but I hope you understand what I mean. Still, autofocus of the MARK4 is also very good.
I shoot very often with a converter mounted on my ''old'' 500mm F4.

With the MARK4 autofocus is a bit more slow, so therefore misses some more shots. But whe you have enough time, the MARK4 does also a very good job.

Jan

10
When you put a 1.4 converter on your lens, you can be sure that the autofocus is a bit slower.
Buying a 400 mm F2.8 and combining it with a converter does not help you much I guess.
If you want to spend money, buy a new 500 mm or 600 mm. With a 600 mm you have more reach and it' s even fast with the new converters type 3. What about a 1Dx?? It has an amazing fast autofocus.
Possibilities enough.

Jan

11
Have my 1Dx now for a couple of months. Send it twice to a Canon service center for cleaning. It did help a little bit.
When it arrived the sensor was very dirty. Canon must shame itself a little bit for delivering a top tool as dirty as it was. Altogheter I've spend several hours to clean it, but the dust is very difficult to remove. It is now on a acceptable level, I don't have to remove 50 or more spots a frame anymore.

For the rest, great camera with an outstanding autofocus.

Jan

12
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS-1D X Firmware Specifcations
« on: January 25, 2013, 04:09:32 AM »
1-1. The function to disable the Image Size selection button is added.

S___, S___, S___,....... to late.

Shot yesterday some nice aggressive action between two males Snow Bunting, some of them are really nice.
When I loaded the pictures up to the computer I was amazed by the huge numbers that fitted on the card.
Unfortunatly the image size was changed to M1 and even not the highest quality. Result, images not even the size of 3MB.

It was a cold day with a windchill factor of about minus 11 degrees Celsius, so I was wearing big gloves.
I even had a moment in wich I was wondering how many frames I was still be able to make on that card, but it did not trigger me enough to check it out. Stupid mistake.

Jan

13
Software & Accessories / DPP and dust delete data
« on: December 28, 2012, 04:32:53 AM »
Who has experience with using '' dust delete data'' ?? ( Canon EOS 1D X )

Although I' am still waiting for the DPP-disk wich was not included in the box from my new camera, I ' like to know if it is possible to use this tool in a batch. Is it working properly and does it not effect your images???

Normally I import my images into Aperture, throw away the ones I don't want to keep and do some adjustments. Then I transform the images I want to sent away  into JPEGS and remove sensordust with Photoshop Elements. After a holiday I have often 3000 to 4000 images to go thrue and to make a selection using DPP is not ideal ( open them one by one ).  To do this in a batch should be great, but I never have used DPP.

Thanks for your help.

14
Very nice job. Can you tell me what the temperature was?
At the end of february I'am going to Kamtsjatka. Temperatures can drop there to minus 40 degrees Celsius, but will be normally around -25 degrees.  We go camping on the beach!!!!. I' ll take my 1D mark4 AND 1D-X and hope they keep working.

Thanks.

15
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Thoughts on the New EOS-1D X Firmware 1.1.1
« on: October 21, 2012, 11:59:30 AM »
What was wrong with the former system???
Black focuspoints are much less usable then red ones in certain conditions. And that is what it's all about.
If a new system is developed, make sure it is a better one, at least as userfriendly as the former one.

I think the point is versatility. With the etched screen, all the points are there, all the time (and 61 densely packed points is a lot!).  With the transmissive LCD, you can choose to display only the active point(s), there's an easy visual indicator of regular vs. spot AF vs. expansion, you have an on-demand viewfinder grid as opposed to needing to swap a focus screen, you can have the electronic level displayed in the VF, etc.

IMO, there are big advantages to the LCD.

You've got some good points and I do use some of them. I'am not familiair with all the technical details I have to admit. But still, the blinking is very distracting and I have never liked disco. I turned it off already, it drives me a bit crazy. I would like to see some more information about when the lightning meter is fooled and how big is the impact. Canon should give us the option to be red all the time, the blinking option or to turn it off. I mostly shoot in daylight condition and I suppose there will be no effect during these circumstances. In this way it's not nice to use.

Pages: [1] 2