Messages

1

EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS-b Images Leak & a New Kit Lens

« on: March 19, 2013, 04:12:54 PM »

It all makes perfect sense except that the price tag is supposed to be 800$. Is that the entry-level? O.o

Sometimes it's more expensive to make something smaller. And just because it's smaller doesn't mean it has to be a lower level.

The question is will the build quality be good enough to satisfy people used to XXD or XD bodies. I've read that the EOS-M build quality is good and I hope this follows suit.

And if a body only version is available for $699 that's reasonable. I have no desire for any EF-S kit lens.

2

EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS-b Images Leak & a New Kit Lens

« on: March 19, 2013, 12:52:53 PM »

edit: deleted, I got the D3200 weight wrong, this is actually about 15% lighter than a D3200

It's also significantly smaller than the D3200. The D3200 is basically the same size as the T3; the EOS-b is a lot smaller.

Cheers,

b&

I just had a thought. Maybe it's not a "b" at all maybe it's the musical flat symbol. So the new body is a half step lower than an EOS.

3

EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS-b Images Leak & a New Kit Lens

« on: March 19, 2013, 11:58:36 AM »

yet another disappointment from canon. old sensor, order specs, outrageous price. why can't they just accept the future of the sub 1000 camera body is mirror-less. enough with this surplus parts revel crap.

Because it's not solely. Sure, if you don't want to shoot anything that moves. This body might bring all the features of the EOS-M plus phase detect AF when desired with a modest increase in size. I'm going to take a good look at it and I've never considered getting a rebel before.

4

EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS-b Images Leak & a New Kit Lens

« on: March 19, 2013, 11:47:10 AM »

The weight is in the panasonic G3 class - amazing. And the lens mount looks h-u-g-e!

Yeah, here's a comparison to the other smallest Rebels of the past (XTi and XS), sorry I was too lazy to resize the pictures:

[...]
EDIT: On the opposite side of the spectrum, here it is in comparison to the EOS M and EF adapter:

[...]

Looks pretty much like an EOS-M with a prism housing - size wise.

5

EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS-b Images Leak & a New Kit Lens

« on: March 19, 2013, 10:44:42 AM »

Pretty good value for the money, I'd say.

As small as it is, what this camera needs is a 20mm 2.8 ef-s pancake as a companion lens.

+1. I almost ordered an EOS-M from BB at $549 yesterday. If this camera in live view operates like the EOS-M and has the option of faster operation with the mirror down it might be a winner. But I agree it needs a small fast prime. a 20 or 22mm pancake would be perfect.

6

PowerShot / Re: Canon PowerShot SX280 HS

« on: March 18, 2013, 12:42:30 PM »

Well, the rumored small DSLR was specced with Digic 5. Unlikely they'd announce a powershot with a more advanced processor at the same time. So I'd guess one or the other is an error.

But then, what do I know.

7

Reviews / Re: Review - Canon EF 24-70 f/2.8L II

« on: November 07, 2012, 10:51:07 AM »

I've said this before. Although bulkier and heavier, I appreciate the hood setup on the old 24-70 for moving around without a lens cap on. When you bring the barrel back to 70mm there's a lot of protection there. And when the barrel is extended, it's all inside the hood.

Not so with the new lens, where the barrel has no protection at all when extended. If I knock up against something with the old lens, or drag it through the brush, nothing touches the lens itself.

Just my preference, I guess.

8

Pricewatch Deals / Re: Canon USA August Rebates

« on: August 13, 2012, 10:49:33 AM »

Picked up a 17-40 yesterday with the $100 discount. Less than $200 more than they're going for on eBay.

9

Lenses / Re: Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM Product Advisory

« on: August 08, 2012, 12:18:46 PM »

So...putting your lens cap on might cause it to not be able to AF without taking the lens off and on?

Yeah, that's something that shouldn't have made it past QC testing.

True. It's happened to me putting the lens cap back on. It's not hard to get in the practice of retracting the lens first, though. And you don't have to remove the lens just rotate it a bit and re lock it.

I stil love the lens.

10

EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS M Specs

« on: July 22, 2012, 11:08:15 AM »

I'd like to know whether the new EF-M lenses will fit on a DSLR.  The 22mm F2 would be great on a crop body.

I would think not. The lens would have to be inside the lens mount on the camera due to the shorter mount to sensor distance. That's why the adapter for EF lenses.

11

EOS Bodies / Re: Canon's Next Full Frame Camera [CR2]

« on: July 18, 2012, 06:38:40 AM »

I haven't read all the posts, but I'm going to predict the new kit lens will be an EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM.

12

Lenses / Re: A New EF 50 f/1.8 IS? [CR1]

« on: July 07, 2012, 09:14:08 AM »

STM maybe?

13

EOS Bodies / Re: Canon Mirrorless Information [CR1]

« on: July 02, 2012, 11:12:00 AM »

Not sure I understand the point of having the pancake be larger (with adapter) on a mirrorless than it is on a 5D. But then, I'm sure the aim is to sell the lenses with the new mount.

14

PowerShot / Re: Canon PowerShot S100 Product Advisory

« on: July 02, 2012, 10:01:00 AM »

Mine starts with 43. Guess sometimes it pays to wait.

15

Pricewatch Deals / Re: Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM in Stock at Norman Camera

« on: June 20, 2012, 05:55:25 PM »

How the heck do you cancel an order at B+H??? I've logged in and am looking at my order but there isn't an option shown to cancel it...

Call or email.