July 28, 2014, 01:35:07 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - infared

Pages: 1 ... 34 35 [36] 37 38 ... 54
526
Lenses / Re: EF 24-70 f/4L IS Resolution Tests
« on: January 06, 2013, 03:19:11 AM »
And the winner is............Tamron

Honestly there is no real reason to chose the 24-70 f4 IS unless you really (and i mean really) care about saving a little weight.  Seems to me the 24-105 now has to go the way of the dinosaurs for canon to move this lens in bulk.


...more thorough research may change your consideration:

http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/09/tamron-24-70-f2-8-vc-issue

I am not always a Canon Fanboy...but in some cases it is worth at least trying-on those clothes....

527
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: BLOWN away.
« on: January 05, 2013, 07:01:28 PM »
Couldn't resist!  :o

528
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: BLOWN away.
« on: January 05, 2013, 06:28:32 PM »
"Gotta fit in my jeans pocket for me to call it pocketable."....
guess it depends on who is wearing the jeans, no?

529
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: BLOWN away.
« on: January 05, 2013, 02:32:37 PM »
Hey Albi, be careful, he's an artist!

(smirk).

530
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: BLOWN away.
« on: January 05, 2013, 09:20:37 AM »
Really? At $2,800 without the $600 viewfinder I think your point is misplaced. Why wouldn't any camera with a 135 sized sensor put out 135 format IQ?

That is $3400 with viewfinder...PLUS..no battery charger $27
http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2013/01/04/quick-tip-for-sony-rx100-and-rx1-owners-nice-external-charger-and-batteries
:-)
It is impressive IQ...I will give you that!

531
Technical Support / Re: Repairing Scratches - 5D MKIII
« on: January 05, 2013, 08:43:37 AM »
my mom used to say.. "old pan makes good food!"
Well, as Moms usually are, I am sure she was talking about heat transfer from the pan base. Moms are reluctant to take credit and as a result transfer the credit elsewhere.

My theory is that Moms make good food in any pan, or wok or pot or... whatever...
:)

BTW, the same goes for photographs. I am not saying that the pan - oops, camera or lens does not count. The person behind counts more. Naturally, the ingredients count even more... :)

My Mom told me that if my camera is scratched that I should give it a heavy coat of industrial black paint and then put it in a pre-heated oven, set at 500 degrees for 29 mins.   

532
Lenses / Re: EF 24-70 f/4L IS Resolution Tests
« on: January 04, 2013, 05:24:39 PM »
Roger gives us the BEST info!!!!  Thanks Roger...I always feel informed after reading anything that he posts.

533
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Canon 5DIII and Media Cards...
« on: January 04, 2013, 08:19:43 AM »
I know that this is an old discussion topic...but I just am trying to clarify things for my (old) brain.
Regarding how the 5DIII records to to the two different card types, my readings and my own findings with my
camera tell me that:
1. If I write to the CF Card ONLY  the write speed will be native to that card (with or without an SD card in the camera). i.e. a 600X card will record at or about 45MB/sec.
2. If I write to the SD Card ONLY the camera can only write up to 20MB/sec regardless as to the write-speed of the SD card that I put in the card slot. i.e. If I put a 600x SD card in the slot with 45MB/sec rated speed, the Camera will only be able to write to that card at 20MB/sec.
3. If I have a CF card and an SD card in each slot, both rated at 45MB/sec and set the camera to write to both cards simultaneously, in the same image type to each card (i.e. RAW, Jpeg, etc.),  when I record an image, both cards will be written to at the slower, 20MB sec rate.
4. If I set the camera to write to both cards with different imaged types (i.e. write RAW to the CF and Jpeg to the SD, or visca-versa the writing will take a longer time than if the camera was set to write the same type of image to each card as in #3 above.
Question:
What is the fastest CF card that the camera can write to at the cards native write speed? i.e. how fast can the camera write to a CF card?
Any input to confirm 1-4 above or to increase my understanding of my camera would be welcome...I think I have it correct..but I could be wrong.
Thanks.
 

534
Pricewatch Deals / Re: EF 24-70 f/4L IS in Stock at B&H Photo
« on: January 04, 2013, 04:14:22 AM »
Wait a month: $1100.

535
Lenses / Re: Soon to be Launched EF 200-400 f/4L IS 1.4x
« on: January 03, 2013, 11:10:57 AM »
$11,000....WOW!
I would expect image quality to be "stunning" even with the extender in place. I know it is just me...but I do not "get" a lens of this configuration at this cost factor. I guess it gives pros good versatility in certain situations.
...but at that cost with an extender switch..sounds like the lens could be open to some serious maintenance situations down the road.   Not trying to be negative...just standing back and scratching my head, based on what I know about photography. It is interesting, to say the least.

actually, I know a lot of bird and sports shooters that would love to have this lens.  it's pretty much the ultimate long lens in terms of flexibility, first between having the 200-400 zoom range, and then being able to throw in a 1.4x extender without having to unmount the camera, attach the extender, and then remount the camera.

yeah...it is not something I could ever afford to buy...but I am REALLY interested to see a review of the lens, as it is quite complicated, to see how it performs. ...I get the flexibility part...but $11 GRAND!!!! WOW!.

536
Lenses / Re: Soon to be Launched EF 200-400 f/4L IS 1.4x
« on: January 03, 2013, 09:34:49 AM »
$11,000....WOW!
I would expect image quality to be "stunning" even with the extender in place. I know it is just me...but I do not "get" a lens of this configuration at this cost factor. I guess it gives pros good versatility in certain situations.
...but at that cost with an extender switch..sounds like the lens could be open to some serious maintenance situations down the road.   Not trying to be negative...just standing back and scratching my head, based on what I know about photography. It is interesting, to say the least.

537
Lenses / Re: Prime Lens for 6D
« on: January 02, 2013, 08:31:04 PM »
How about the 35mm f/1.4 Sigma...? That looks like a killer lens. I own the Sigma 50mm f/1.4 and LOVE it. Low depth of field and incredible bokeh with fast focus. All my other lenses are Canon "L" glass (and one Zeiss) but I broke protocol with the Sigma because I just believe it offers more than Canon in that area at the right price. I do not own the Sigma 35mm ...but again, I think Sigma has trumped Canon once again with quality, style and price.
Either one of those lenses would be a great cost-effective way to get your feet wet with a fast bokeh-licious prime in the normal or slightly wide lens range.

538
Portrait / Re: Post your best portraits(street, studio, candid etc...).
« on: December 31, 2012, 07:24:02 PM »
 8)

539
@infared: Thanks a lot. Yes, time will tell us. So, while the 16-35 is out there, that's a way to go. I wouldn't buy the nikon plus adapter. So I might purchase the classic L WA by summer and see what happens. If I wanna go UW for stars, there is still an 14 f/2.8 MF Samyang at a decent price, to provide as much as exposure value as possible while applying 500/600 rule for moonless nightsky shots.

Wow...if you want it for shooting stars the Sam Yang could be a great way to go for you...you get a LOT for that price...you can always sell it later.
If the Canon SWZ actually materializes AND is as good as the Nikon I plan on selling my 16-35mm L and my Zeiss 21mm..I might even have a little $ left over after the purchase!!!! LOL!

540
Pedro,I find the 14-24mm "rumor" to be quite exciting. It gives hope that FF Canon owners will have:
1. A relatively fast ultra-wide angle lens that would fill the slot for the ultimate triade of lenses. (Coupled with the 24-70mm f/2.8L II & 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II)
2. Finally, a high-performing Ultra-wide-angle zoom

Number 2 above is the tough one for me, as Canon is definitely unproven in this lens area. The Nikon UWZ is the benchmark.Canon has not come close to this, no doubt....but based on recent lens offerings I am hopeful that Canon will compete in this area as well especially given the recent improvements in the 24-70mm f/2.8L II & 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II lenses.

But, since the Tsunami Canon has still not resumed their prior manufacturing capabilities AND Canon has instituted irrattic pricing guidelines.

So moving forward...this new Golden Fleece is just a rumor...if announced it is a long way off (I site the massive delays from the announcement date for the 24-70mm II), and you can bet your babushka that this Golden Fleece will be expensive (I site the intro pricing on the 24-70mm II). IF this lens is produced, and IF it is of the quality that we are hoping for it will be intro priced in the mid $2000's. No doubt about that. (Yes...I know I am speculating...about a "rumored" lens. LOL!). Again, based on post-Tsunami pricing policies. Canon shooters have been waiting years for this lens..expect to pay dearly for it.

I am encouraged that this lens will be built, as I think Canon is preparing its whole lens line-up to get the most out of the upcoming megapixel body that we keep hearing about. So it makes sense that this lens will materialize.

Until then...I plan to keep using my 16-35 II ( when I need auto-focus) and my Zeiss 21mm f/2.8 ZE (for when it really matters to me :-))...and during the long wait...I may pick up the new Zeiss 15mm f/2.8 ZE ( for when it really, really matters!)....but I am still on the fence about that because of the cost (ouch!).

I hope Canon makes this lens and that it is all that we hope for...time will tell.

Pages: 1 ... 34 35 [36] 37 38 ... 54