February 28, 2015, 07:36:54 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - tron

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 134
46
24-70 2.8 II or 16-35 f/4 IS. It is a tough decision but I think 24-70 2.8 wins...

A landscape is not only something that demands an UWA lens...

47
EOS Bodies / Re: 6D HDR problem
« on: January 03, 2015, 06:11:30 PM »
Check the following dpreview thread:

http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/

It does not clarify though what was happening in earlier firmware versions. By the way what firmware do you use?

Also, you cannot have the intermediate photos saved in 6D. In addition, the result is always a JPG (Even in 5D3) so there is no big deal except from the fact that you have to switch from raw to jpg and back every time you need to take an on camera hdr picture.

I was curious about this, also so I went to look  The link throws a 404 error.  Can you check the link and repost?

Thanks!
Greg
Ooops sorry! I must have missed something in copy paste. I will search again and report back.

EDIT: 

http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/51111796

It's text follows:

My guess is that you have raw selected. Set it to jpg and it will not be grayed out.

More info follows:
IMPORTANT

    If you shoot a moving subject, the subjects movement will leave afterimages.
    The color gradation of the sky or white walls may not be reproduced correctly. Irregular colors or noise may appear.
    HDR shooting under fluorescent or LED lighting may result in unnatural color reproduction of the illuminated areas.

REFERENCE

    Only the merged HDR image will be saved. The three images used to produce the merged HDR image will not be saved.
    You cannot select RAW and RAW+JPEG. The HDR mode cannot be set if RAW or RAW+JPEG is set.
    If you set AEB, white balance bracketing, Multi Shot Noise Reduction, multiple shot exposures or if you shoot bulb exposures or a movie, HDR mode cannot be set.
    Flash will not fire during HDR shooting.
    HDR shooting is not possible with ISO expansion. (HDR shooting is possible within the range of ISO 100 - 25600.)
    Since HDR shooting merges the images, it will take a longer time to record the HDR image to the card than with normal shooting. During the processing of the images, "buSY" will be displayed in the viewfinder and on the LCD panel and you cannot take another picture until the processing is completed.
    In HDR mode, the options grayed out in the camera menu cannot be set. Note that when you set HDR mode, the Auto Lighting Optimizer, highlight tone priority, and exposure simulation will be set to [Disable] before shooting.


48
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: New Firmware Coming for EOS 5D Mark III
« on: January 03, 2015, 05:43:13 PM »
There's a screenshot here: http://goo.gl/LQdKN3
Since it is certain that you are the same chris_overseas from ML forum allow me to thank you for your work on 5D3 1.2.3 port   :)
(Using 1.2.3 ML on both of my 5D3s)

49
EOS Bodies / Re: 6D HDR problem
« on: January 03, 2015, 10:41:00 AM »
Check the following dpreview thread:

EDIT:

http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/51111796

It does not clarify though what was happening in earlier firmware versions. By the way what firmware do you use?

Also, you cannot have the intermediate photos saved in 6D. In addition, the result is always a JPG (Even in 5D3) so there is no big deal except from the fact that you have to switch from raw to jpg and back every time you need to take an on camera hdr picture.

50
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Possible new 5D3 firmware 1.3.3 ???
« on: January 03, 2015, 09:02:39 AM »
hello,

FYI: I came across the following:

http://www.magiclantern.fm/forum/index.php?topic=14229.0

There is NOTHING at Canon's site though...

51
Lenses / Re: What is your favorite lens/camera combo in your camerabag?
« on: January 01, 2015, 10:22:31 PM »
Looks like I am losing my religion.
The sony a6000 is on its way and with the adapter...who knows, I'll explore.
S___, why did Canon miss their chance?
Is there somebody out there who'd think that it would make sense to wait for the Canon version of the technically quite mature a6000?
All the EF lenses I have are compatible with the Sony with an adapter.
Allahu akbar.
I'll get me a Sony!

That's #1 mistake newbies made. Tiny mirrorless body with adapter + EF lenses  ::)

You might as well sell all your EF and stick with their native.
A6000 with Canon lenses is indeed funny! What is the purpose of a6000? To save 1-5% in total equipment weight? (or size)  ;D ;D ;D

52
Lenses / Re: What is your favorite lens/camera combo in your camerabag?
« on: January 01, 2015, 04:26:59 PM »
What is the use of Sony a6000 with a canon adapter (and a canon lens)? The total size and weight is almost the same as with a Canon camera!

This defeats its purpose of portability!

53
EOS Bodies / Re: 1DX or 1DX2 - that is the question
« on: December 31, 2014, 08:59:16 PM »
To be (1Dx) or NOT to be (1DXII) that is the question ...  ;D ;D ;D

54
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon Confirms Development of High Megapixel Camera
« on: December 31, 2014, 09:51:29 AM »
I agree ... partially: Personally, I'd be happy with a 22 MP (not MB) 5DIV if it came with significantly better dynamic range and high iso (and not another incremental crawl such as what we got with 5DIII).

That and 2 fps more (with the new AF system of course  ;D )

56
Canon General / Re: What do you copy from your camera card?
« on: December 31, 2014, 09:43:49 AM »
If you move the card between cameras, then you should delete it first, or info about image numbers, etc will be transferred to images with the second cameras.  The camera will recreate it, and start numbering images from 0001.
 
We often see posts from users who bought a new camera, and popped in the card from their old camera.  They see image 7033 or some high number appear, and think they bought a used camera.  Some users do not move cards between cameras in order to prevent the issue.
Me included!  :-[  (I saw  500+)

But, many shots later I installed ML and saw the shutter count being around  100.

So it was new. No harm done  ;D

57
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon Confirms Development of High Megapixel Camera
« on: December 30, 2014, 10:28:52 PM »
It makes no sense to replace the 5D3 with 52 MP body based on the 7D2 sensor. 

The 5D3 is a great wedding/event/portrait camera and sometime sports body.  While I don't shoot professionally, this is me.  I'm not looking for more resolution, especially if it means a step backwards in high ISO performance.  If anything, I'd like the 5D4 to incorporate the 7D2 sensor technology with larger, full-frame pixels for even better low light performance.  AF during video would be a nice plus (even thought video is a more distant interest for me).

The 5D4 should also include a bump in FPS and buffer performance.  I don't see this happening with 52 MP.  All I see with 52 MP is HUGE RAW files, maybe 90-100 MB each.  That's a lot for in-camera crunching and recording to cards.

I'll look at a 20 MP 5D4 with a nice bump in low light performance long before considering a 52 MP body.  I still think the 52 MP body has a different audience than those who currently buy the 5D line.  It actually makes more sense to put the 52 MP in the 6D2.  But, it makes the most sense to spawn a new line of bodies for the high MP sensor.
+100000 Finally someone sensible!  :) 

58
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon Confirms Development of High Megapixel Camera
« on: December 30, 2014, 11:51:54 AM »
It would be stupid to make a 52Mp 5DIV.  22 and 52 Mp cover people with different needs (speed &  low light/resolution)

It would be much better to do it like Nikon a top Mp model and a medium Mp flexible one.

Just my thoughts...

59
Lenses / Re: Upgrade or not the 24-70 f/2.8, a thousand dollar question.
« on: December 28, 2014, 07:45:26 AM »
OK, then. You are pretty unanimous that the new 24-70 f/2.8  II really is so much better than the previous model that the upgrade would probably even make a difference in the pictures I am taking.
I really like the 85mm L and the 24mm L.
Then there is the dust pump 100-400mm...another 1000 dollars to upgrade that one also?
Personally I am thinking about it. I have no personal opinion on this though. I trust the tests. Unfortunately the new lens is about 200g heavier though  :(
In addition, the reverse use of rings is confusing and impractical  (at least for me).

60
EOS Bodies / Re: A New EOS M with EVF Second Half of 2014?
« on: December 27, 2014, 10:38:35 PM »
By now we must assume that what was said - in the thread title - didn't happen  :(

Let's hope it happens early next year...

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 134