You're correct, I should have said "will probably have". I could bet you a lot of money right now that the 7D2 will have a 20 mp sensor very similar if not identical to that in the 70D, but I can't afford to, and you wouldn't pay up anyways.
We can get into a debate that wastes my time about whether there is an "overall" or not, but on the "hole", it's not worth my time in debating something like that with you...mostly because it's silly, immature, etc...but then I'm not the one wanting to debate it...I wish I could make as much money while wasting my time as you do, but at this time I don't. One thing is for sure, both you and neuro are overpaid by orders of magnitude for what you do...and apparently you have something on your bosses, or you would be fired for dallying...:-D
Why do you have to get so personal and spiteful? Its not just with me, either...you seem to do the same thing with neuro:
You're rather humorless more than usual today, John. Never claimed I knew how others should spend their money, I said how I would spend MY money. And you did agree with me that the 6D is a good value. To debate this further, is immature and silly, borderline schoolgirl-ish...but then that's what you and jrista are good at. Get back to work and lay off the nugenix...I prefer a more mature and humorous exchange. Good Day Dr. Bigshot.
You call us childish...but what exactly are the quotes above, with the name calling and insults? Refined and mature?
Ok Jrista, you are not only more intelligent, evolved, masculine, wealthy, and mature than me, but you're also a better photographer...more artistic...your whole existence is better than mine. You are my superior sir, thank you for endlessly pointing it out, I know I can always count on you both to point out how I am inferior to you.
I could repeat the question...but I wonder what that would actually accomplish...
Why are you taking my criticism of the 7D as some kind of insult to your manhood (or lack thereof) already? And what names did I call you exactly? I believe you have called me some names in the past...so let's not get all high and mighty mr. polly prissy pants. And you know what I'm talking about.
I think you are severely misunderstanding something. I take no insult from your criticism of the 7D. I take insult at your blatant personal insults...
You know, the ones that said I was silly, immature, wasteful of my money, etc.
I debated your criticism of the 7D because the argument demonstrated a bias that did not call into play all of the facts, or analyze the subject from other angles. I don't debate because I am insulted...I debate when I see inaccuracies, falsehoods, fallacies, bias, etc. in peoples posts. It isn't personal most of the time (ankorwatt is an exception, I'll happily admit that), its really just about the facts. I'm happy to change my opinion if you either prove me wrong with hard facts, or demonstrate a different way of looking at a problem (of which there is evidence for in a couple threads this year.)
As for names, it was the "Mr. Bigshot" you called Neuro. Did you somehow think that wasn't equivalent to the childish playground act of name calling?
Anyway, your continued use of playground insults making my point for me... I have no personal malice towards you for criticizing the 7D. It has its flaws. Your continued use of insults of both neuro and myself, simply because we made a few cogent arguments, however, will probably cause some people to have malice towards you (neuro has a lot of fans....)