Can anyone please post sunburst shots of the 16-35 F4 at f16 or f22? I want to see how it stacks up to that of the 2.8 II version Here is an example at f/16. I think this will be my go-to lens for car shows.
I find the 16-35mm f/4 to be sharper at the edges than my 17-40mm. I enjoyed my 17-40mm, but now I have a hard time justifying keeping it. I thought I would miss the extra 5mm at the long end, but I don't. Now to sell my 17-40mm. Too bad it sounds like the prices have taken a hit since people are switching to the 16-35mm f/4.
Thanks for this. I also own the 17-40 right now and planning to get the 16-35 f4. I read somewhere that the build is not as robust as that of the 16-35 f2.8 version. Is this true?
My wife's 100 L, my 2470 and 1635 are all made of the same plastic, and they have seen some pretty bad abuse, see picture on previous page of my son. And none of these lenses are scarred at all.
And Roger at Lens Rentals said the new 16-35 in particular along with the 100-400 II are much better built than the previous 1635/1740 and the old 100-400.
So no, it's not true it's poorer built.