April 21, 2014, 11:08:28 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Jan Jasinski

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
Someone needs to come out with a current high quality 400mm f5.6 prime.  I would switch systems for a high quality handheld bird lens.
I think that there are a lot of people interested in a new version of the 400F5.6.... I would get it....

I love my 400mm f/5.6L... Is there anything this "lot" of people need from it that it doesn't have/do?! Weather sealing, sure, but asides from that I love it's relatively light weight and small size without IS/zoom/wider aperture - coupled with the 5D3 sensor's ISO handling this thing's even incredible when losing daylight!
I guess closer focusing would be nice but that'd maybe ruin the magical optical formula! ;)
I agree, my 400mm is a very nice lens, fun to play with it when coupled with the 2x II extender.
My 6D's ISO allows me to be less limited to the 5.6 aperture than when I was shooting with a Rebel.
Although, I still really wished I had IS, which is why I sometimes hesitate on getting a 100-400L, but other than that I love everything about prime.
I find myself not being able to do extreme panning handheld because of the lack of IS :(

2
Canon General / Re: Official: Sigma 24-105mm f/4 DG OS
« on: October 15, 2013, 05:34:28 PM »
Lens isn't listed on Sigma's Global site. The links directed to it don't work, and error occurs.
Perhaps they aren't ready to release it?

3
Lenses / Re: flying with 600f4 or 400f2.8
« on: July 28, 2013, 08:59:20 PM »
It shouldn't be a problem flying with a 600 f/4 as carry on. You may have to pay extra depending on airline baggage fees. Are you flying WestJet? It would be good to contact them.
Btw your siggy isn't up to date  ;D

4
Technical Support / Re: Canon 5D3 at airshow
« on: July 18, 2013, 04:01:41 PM »
What lens are you using for these shots Jan?
Looks like a 400?

Great shots, really sharp - this is what I am looking for.
Thanks  ;D !
I was mostly using my friend's 100-400L, but I think some some shots were with my 400 f/5.6L.

5
Technical Support / Re: Canon 5D3 at airshow
« on: July 17, 2013, 02:52:56 PM »
70-200 will be too short for flying aircraft. Depending where your standing, it will be good for when they are taxing to the RWY or close to the audience.
If you don't want to spend a lot, 100-400L or 400 f/5.6L will be great. Ideal choice would be 500 f/4L or a 300 f/2.8L with converters. If you have 2 bodies it makes things a lot easier.
For fighter jets, try and keep the shutter speed high as they are quick!!
Prop jets, 1/100 is a sweet spot to get full prop discs but it can vary and you might need to go as low as 1/60.


W A R B I R D by Jan Jasinski, on Flickr


F I G H T ER by Jan Jasinski, on Flickr


Canada - Air Force | McDonnell Douglas CF-18 Hornet | 188781 | CYND by Jan Jasinski, on Flickr


Canada - Air Force | McDonnell Douglas CF-18 Hornet | 188781 | CYND {Explored} by Jan Jasinski, on Flickr


Pitts Special by Jan Jasinski, on Flickr

6
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 70D a New Benchmark in ISO Performance?
« on: July 07, 2013, 10:55:01 PM »
a 70D doing better than 6D in ISO performance is all possible.
Just like a 6 cylinder car out doing a 8 cylinder car of the same engine capacity because they have new technology applied. but when then new tech is apply to the 8 cylinder engine it will over come again.

So APS-c do better than FF for a while, then FF improve again.
Why on earth would they make a 1200$ camera that outperforms the 6D? Then no one would buy the 6D because it would only be advantaged to having GPS. The 6D has benchmark ISO performance, currently the best on the market which is why it attracks so many low light shooters.

7
So if i'm living in Canada I can't get the rebate because it goes on American Express credit card?

8
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon Dual Pixel Liveview Autofocus
« on: July 02, 2013, 12:26:21 AM »
There's already a video of the 70D, it's actually smaller than the 60D!
http://m.usatoday.com/article/news/2480809

9
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon 70D Reaction
« on: June 29, 2013, 10:30:09 PM »
It hasn't even been announced and he's hating like he's had it for 5 years now  :P
Some people will do anything to get attention. Spend more time learning about photography than judging camera specs etc. After all, it's how you use the camera..

10
EOS Bodies / Re: Is This the EOS 3D?
« on: June 18, 2013, 12:47:28 PM »
Nice fake.

Well, according to your signature you could tell us a bit more  ;D 8)
Haha touché  :P

11
Landscape / Re: Beautiful sunsets
« on: June 07, 2013, 07:12:47 PM »

12
Canon General / Re: EOS 5D Mark III w/24-70 f/4L IS Kit Coming Soon
« on: June 05, 2013, 04:29:06 PM »
The 6D already comes with the 24-70 f/4L as a kit at Vistek in Canada:

http://vistek.ca/store/DigitalSLRs/266307/canon-eos-6d-w-ef-2470mm-f40l-usm-kit.aspx

13
Pricewatch Deals / Re: Canon EOS 6D for $1546
« on: May 04, 2013, 03:41:43 PM »
Wow! Now only if it can get down to that level here in Malaysia... Anyway next year I'll be living in Canada.  Any Canadians here who knows the current price of 6D?  Thanks.
1800$ in Canada brand new from authorized photography stores.

15
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 7D Mark II Test Camera [CR1]
« on: March 28, 2013, 07:12:14 AM »
If these specs are really what the 7D2 will be then I see no point of waiting so long for this.
Might as well buy a 7D or just go FF.

1 CF card surprised me and the 19 AF points, sounds like the current 7D with "slight" improvements...

Edit*

If this is a 70D then I can accept these specs...
It is a CR1 so nothing is certain. Canon aren't too quick on these new releases  ::)

Pages: [1] 2 3