« on: March 22, 2012, 09:37:27 PM »
CameraLabs just posted some 5D Mark III vs 5D Mark II noise comparison shots (JPEG only, RAW to follow)
Just looking at these sample I dont understand why poeple say the new sensor is not better. First on noise these pictures suggest to my eye ~1.5 stop better ISO. Color and details are way better on the mkIII compared to the mkII, again using these pictures.
Because these are out-of-camera JPGs.
The JPG engine in the 5DIII is obviously vastly better than in the 5DII.
Produces results on par with a good RAW converter.
Surely a big improvement but RAW comparisons show that the sensor (not the JPG engine) is hardly improved.