March 01, 2015, 08:07:42 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Aglet

Pages: 1 ... 21 22 [23] 24 25 ... 75
It's an impressively spec'd little camera with a fair complement of accessories.
I'm not sure I'd opt for it vs a slightly larger sensor M43 body tho.
The initial price is, well, up there.
Mirrorless AF systems are getting competitive but the one feature I like so far on this N1v3 is the high speed video; that may tempt me to try one when the price recedes a bit.  It may also be possible to pull 4k video out of a small sensor like this too, if that's something Nikon decides would benefit them.

EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 7D Replacement Mentioned Again [CR1]
« on: March 12, 2014, 03:13:57 PM »
For me, it's all about pixel density. I have 20/10 vision..I can CLEARLY see the pixels. It's utterly horrid..

I'm at 20/15 w-o correction, and I can see the pixels in my EVF too if I want to concentrate on that.  But it doesn't bother me since I don't expect it to look exactly like an OVF. There's enough information density to be useful for what it is, a composition tool with a rich amount of camera data added.  I don't need to color-proof with it, don't care if it has other limitations you've described, as long as it's fast, responsive, works well in low light and provides the information I need to perform the function it's supposed to.
It does that just fine, and it's even better than an OVF when it comes to low light.  I don't mind a little noise in my low light EVF image when it allows me to see more detail than I could looking thru an OVF.
So, if today's EVFs don't appeal to you, tomorrow's might.
One of the other benefits is I get from an EVF is a much better idea of how a stopped down image will look because I'm seeing it without the effect of a focus screen in an OVF that interferes with how the image actually looks for in-focus to OOF transition areas.

Either way, good EVFs won't prevent you from using them for what they are there for, to compose the shot.  Even the very low rez EVF in my old Panasonic FZ-20 was useful and still truckloads better than trying to compose using the rear display in sunlight.

EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 7D Replacement Mentioned Again [CR1]
« on: March 12, 2014, 01:07:59 AM »
And even would require an EVF to function entirely properly...and EVFs have just as long a way to come before they can really be viable replacements for OVFs...

I'd say today's better EVF's are already more than adequate.
My pretty new Fuji XT1's EVF is a pleasure to use, more than adequate resolution and the high frame rate greatly reduces the lag compared to the older Xe bodies.
Combine that with the great low-light gain-up ability Canon's have and these things already see better in the dark than we do.
One more development iteration and OVF has serious competition.

the only thing I don't like about it...
I keep bringing the camera up to my eye to frame a possible shot and have to remember to turn it ON first... (I'm always in battery conservation mode)
And that's still the 2nd shortcoming... using an EVF still eats a lot of power.  I see this being a major consideration when I'm in the wilds for a few days.

Mirrorless with WYSIWYG live histogram, etc.  (like Fuji or Oly)
freeze the button positions or at least make them all programmable with soft indicators on screen if needed
oh, and for my preferences.. stuff an exmor sensor in there with matching front-end circuitry.

Well, without them coming out about it bluntly, the no-analog-gain Dragon sensor shows FPN by the time it's digitally pushed to 3200, no surprise that.

As for the D800, it is my favorite and most capable landscape camera.  Overkill for many other tasks but I enjoy shooting with the quirky things.  It's certainly not a jack-of-all-trades nor a camera for the masses.  I won't be trading in mine for anything on the horizon, not even the moderately priced new Hassie or 645D2... Well, the latter might be tempting.

5D MK III Sample Images / Re: P-51 Mustang
« on: March 04, 2014, 01:31:05 AM »
I love the engine sound of those big warbirds, whether radials or the very distinctive sound of those huge V-12s.  Even when they fly low and loud overhead they're far more pleasant than a jet.
Way back, when I was still in my 20s, I wangled a ride in a 2nd-seat equipped P51 with an aerobatic pilot.
What an experience!  I held my lunch until we landed but I was as green as the camou' paint on that old plane!  That was 45 minutes I'll never forget.
I'd still like to find a ride in a Corsair and a P47.

DxOmark's new king of the DR hill is a crop video sensor.  ouch!

Red's Epic Dragon - so video is not a handicap to excellent sensor performance.  I guess I'd based that tenet on some other companys' products. ;)

Altho not very flexible as a still camera, just goes to prove that well designed hardware can produce excellent performance metrics even at video framerates, ... with a crop sensor.  I'm impressed, too bad we don't get to view the basic measurement data.

I wonder how that Arri would test.

Street & City / Re: Neon Bright Stockholm
« on: March 01, 2014, 02:39:28 PM »
I wouldn't do much to 8649, it's got a mood to it that comes across as-is.

The others have very flat lighting but I think they could first benefit from some local contrast enhancements, the strength of which you can vary until it suits your tastes.
After that, you might consider some color toning, subtle or not, to accentuate the look you're after.

It's all up to you, of course.  There are so many processing options available to us these days.
And it is a good idea to solicit opinions from others, tho not necessarily just other photographers, we're a rather biased bunch.  ;D

Street & City / Re: Neon Bright Stockholm
« on: February 28, 2014, 07:34:22 PM »
I think you have some decent compositions here and perhaps the color toning improves on the bland light of the originals, which I cannot say..
But, IMO, I don't find this sort of look appealing enough to look at for more than a few seconds.  But that's just one realist's opinion. :)
I like 8238, 8215 and 8191 but would have processed them quite differently to possibly make them more intriguing looking, again, just my opinion.

check the 5th paragraph

yes, we need to see some real tests but I think Sigma's likely got a lens they can be proud of.

... as I continue to cuss the inconsistent AF of a new, but past warranty EF 50/1.4

Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Sony raw files lossy compressed
« on: February 27, 2014, 03:22:24 PM »
lossy-compressed 14 bit raw files from my Nik's survive PP just fine, are Sony's any different?
36MP camera uncompressed raw file is just silly-big without compression

I'm not arguing _lossless_ compression. That's just common sense. It's the fact that the perception of a RAW image format is exactly what the image sensor recorded. I know it's not 100% exactly, as all of the camera makers have a bit of post-processing in the RAW recording pipeline, but my impression is it's very minimal. The Sony format explicitly removes data from what the image sensor records. RAW means, to the vast majority of people, "unprocessed what the sensor captured".

The Sony format breaks that meaning. I'm not arguing that it matters in the vast majority of real-world photos, just that marketing could have easily put that in as an asterisk and at the bottom said something to the effect of "RAW format uses a high quality, lossy storage format to balance high quality & lower storage space". Instead, they just say "14-bit RAW". Which the format literally and figuratively is not 14-bit.

As for saying 36MP raw images are just silly-big, well, that's why you got a 36MP camera, right? You want super-high resolution images. You want smaller file size? Have the camera store a smaller RAW file. Say mRAW or sRAW. You know. Lower resolution files.

My bad, I somehow skipped the link you provided where the a7's showing horribly obvious artefacting.
Wow, that's throwing out too much data in a way that can have obvious consequences!

BAD move there, Sony, very much limits the abilities of an otherwise game-changing camera.

Sony is a system I don't have at this time, but am considering the a6000 for its abilities/$. I hope they don't do a similar compressed raw format like that on it and hopefully they'll fix the a7 series with a firmware update.

some impressive looking AF tracking and fps videos on this page but I'd really like to see how well it would track AF and shoot with something like a 50mm or longer with f/2 or wider aperture.

edit - add another video link:

Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Sony raw files lossy compressed
« on: February 27, 2014, 01:50:26 PM »
lossy-compressed 14 bit raw files from my Nik's survive PP just fine, are Sony's any different?
36MP camera uncompressed raw file is just silly-big without compression

Lenses / Re: Strange AFMA results with canon 50 f1.4
« on: February 25, 2014, 03:16:46 PM »
I kept my old, NIB 50/1.4 and sold my battle-worn but reliable old one.
Silly me to do that without first testing the one in the box!

The new one has some strange behavior where it focuses perfectly, but only at certain distances, everywhere else it's either front or back focusing by as much as 2 feet at a 12 foot distance, for example.
This was tested using only center AF point on 3 different crop bodies, all with the same results and repeatable.
The old one nailed focus reliably, even if it did show a wee bit of focus shift when stopping down.
This newer lens is not even in the general vicinity most of the time.
Very disappointing and since it's well past warranty, I'm either fixing it myself or selling it.  I need it to AF, MF not an option for my intended use.

Anyone else have a 50/1.4 USM behave like that and what was the specific fix?
Perhaps it's a position encoder on the drive train that's not working properly?

Edit - fixed many typos.

Canon General / Re: Off Brand: Nikon Announces the D4S
« on: February 25, 2014, 12:53:06 PM »
To those who say "Canon is not innovative," can now boast of Nikon innovation with ISO 409600. I do not know what use it but the marketing arrange one.
That's what caught my eye, too, and as someone who uses ISO 102400 on my 5DIII all the time, I might have to sell all of my Canon gear to get the D4S.  I think it will really help with my upcoming series - Coal Mines by Matchlight.  If I accidentally run into some methane, this might be my last post ;)

if you have G.A.S. ...

Pages: 1 ... 21 22 [23] 24 25 ... 75