May 19, 2013, 06:53:31 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - dilbert

Pages: 1 ... 97 98 [99] 100 101 ... 119
1471
EOS Bodies / Re: Big Megapixel Camera Next Week.
« on: August 18, 2011, 04:17:12 PM »
This can only be Sony announcing a 30+MP FF camera as the 24MP APS-C is fairly well rumored now. If it was from Nikon, it wouldn't be a surprise as almost everyone is expecting a 30+MP D4 (no surprise there, is there?)

1472
EOS Bodies / Re: 1D Mark V Spec List [CR1]
« on: August 17, 2011, 03:01:35 PM »
This is fairly inline with what we’ve heard previously.

This may be in line with what we've heard previously, but we're obviously hearing these things from people who are making this crap up.

  • Image sizes: 32.4 mp, 16.2 mp, 8.1 mp @ 5, 3 fps
  • APS-H mode (1.3x) – 24.9 mp, 12.5 mp, 6.2 mp @ 8, 3 fps
  • APS-C mode (1.6x) – 20.3 mp, 10.1 mp, 5.1 mp @ 10, 3 fps

Folks, if you're going to fabricate a rumor and send it to CRguy, please go out and learn how sensor sizes scale and also some basic math.

If you take a FF 32.4 MP sensor and run it in a hypothetical 'APS-C mode' you don't get a 32.4 ÷ 1.6 = 20.3 MP image.  The 'crop factor' is a diagonal measure that impacts field of view, but real pixels on a sensor have both x and y dimensions, so when you scale a FF 32.4 MP sensor to that 'APS-C mode' you get a 32.4 ÷ 1.62 = 12.6 MP image.

Please, go waste someone else's time, or come back when you're smarter.

I declare shennigans!!

FWIW, the APS-H megapixel number is also wrong.

But, the question is, is the mode there and the submitter has just made up the megapixel number or is the whole thing a fiction?

1473
Landscape / Re: Post Your Best Landscapes
« on: August 14, 2011, 05:18:31 PM »
...
What lens did you use for this?

I took this with my point and shoot before I really got into photography.  If I had to guess, the equivalent focal length was about 40mm (the camera was a Canon Powershot S3 IS, which was 38mm equivalent at the widest end).

You know that you should have said "With my 1Ds Mark II and the 24-70/2.8." I mean how dare you take such a good looking landscape photograph with a camera setup that cost less than $2000? Don't you realise that people's egos are at stake here?

1474
EOS Bodies / Re: *UPDATE* This & That
« on: August 11, 2011, 07:41:18 AM »
What if the 5D Mark3 never appears and we get a 3D (next year) and a 6D this year?

And if the 3D moves up in terms of what it offers photographers and gets all of the hyped up video (even 3D video!) and the 6D becomes the FF DSLR "that also does video"?

Of course all of those 5D Mark2 owners that feel like their camera is linked to their ego will be suddenly overcome with waves on insecurity because a "lower model" camera will be better than theirs and will cry out in shame at how could Canon do this to them. Diddums.
That wouldn't happen. If a more advanced model comes out called the 3D, and a 5DII beating "FF DLSR that also does video" is released then why would Canon released it as a 6D and discontinue the 5D line? The makes no sense from their past naming patterns and no sense from a marketing perspective.

Why not?

It would allow them to make the 3D more expensive than the 5D and the 6D cheaper.

There's no rule anywhere that a product line needs to live forever.

1475
EOS Bodies / Re: *UPDATE* This & That
« on: August 10, 2011, 04:54:45 PM »

This is actually almost standard M-O for Canon DSLR's. About 2 weeks prior to the real announcement, some Canon affiliated web site "accidentally" posts some tidbit about the soon-to-be-announced camera. In this case, it looks like it was the name. Other times, it was a photo, or a spec sheet, or even a full draft of the press release.

I'd say we can expect an EOS 6D to be announced anywhere from 1 to 3 weeks from now.

While I agree about Canon's M-O for leaks, I don't see a 6D announced right now.

As the name suggests, a 6D would sit between the 7D and the 5DII.

The thing is, there's no need for an even more advanced 1.6x camera than the 7D.

But if the 6D is FF, what features could Canon possibly cripple, so that the 6D sits below the 5DII ??
Make it a 1-fps camera with just a single AF-point ??


The 6D only has to fit under the 5D Mark3 in terms of features.

What if the 5D Mark3 never appears and we get a 3D (next year) and a 6D this year?

And if the 3D moves up in terms of what it offers photographers and gets all of the hyped up video (even 3D video!) and the 6D becomes the FF DSLR "that also does video"?

Of course all of those 5D Mark2 owners that feel like their camera is linked to their ego will be suddenly overcome with waves on insecurity because a "lower model" camera will be better than theirs and will cry out in shame at how could Canon do this to them. Diddums.

1476
In the last 24 hours, I've read reports of people walking out of Jessops with large boxes of expensive digital camera equipment. I imagine that if you could find the people that have those boxes, you can get a pretty good bargain :-)

nothing like buying from scums to fuel more looting

Well, it could be worse - someone without a sense of humour could be replying to a post I made on the internet.

1477
EOS Bodies / Re: *UPDATE* This & That
« on: August 10, 2011, 02:30:23 PM »
Could someone please actually state the sale price that BestBuy was offering? The price is already back up to $2499, and no one thus far stated the sale price. Seems like basic information that they should have included in the OP.

It was around $2139 or there abouts.

1478
In the last 24 hours, I've read reports of people walking out of Jessops with large boxes of expensive digital camera equipment. I imagine that if you could find the people that have those boxes, you can get a pretty good bargain :-)

1479
Landscape / Re: Post Your Best Landscapes
« on: August 09, 2011, 06:07:48 PM »
I can tell how you f'ed it up, you put all that damn text over it!

No, I only had a light weight tripod (Benro) and ball head with me and the lens used to take the photo (70-300) was too heavy for the tripod to keep everything completely still for the long duration (30s) of the shot. Had I of had my Manfrotto with me, it would have been a different story. At 100% magnification, you can see that Half Dome (for example) is not sharp. Why didn't I have the Manfrotto? Because I went out for the weekend, planning to do a bunch of walking... but maybe I just need a stronger ball head.

1480
EOS Bodies / Re: 1D Mark V Information [CR1]
« on: August 08, 2011, 01:17:46 PM »
Rumor is bullS___. If FF is 32 MP, then APS-C crop is 32 / 1,6 / 1,6 = 12,5 MP.

Now ... Imagine the guys with a FF Nikon D3S in crop mode.  They get about 5.5 mp.  Yet, we see people clamoring for this feature who can't do the math.

As I commented in another thread, I suspect that "sensor tech from 1DM5" means the way in which the sensor is made, not the pixel pitch. So it may be that the 1D5 will be the first with "backlit" CMOS or something and that this technology will be then used on other DSLRs from Canon.

1481
EOS Bodies / Re: A Very Detailed 1D Mark V Spec List [CR1]
« on: August 08, 2011, 01:15:40 PM »
The people who sell their equipment, expecting it's price to fall when the new equipment is actually announced.

How about all those people who sold their 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS lenses in anticipation of the MkII version of that lens, only to kick themselves when used prices went UP by a couple hundred dollars once the new version was released?

I mean seriously, apart from the psychological impact, what differences would $200 have made?

1482
EOS Bodies / Re: A Breakdown of Rumors
« on: August 08, 2011, 01:13:22 PM »
How could you forget to mention the 7D Mark2 in your summary?!?!?!


Because there are no real rumors about a 7D2
Exactly.  What is the 7D missing? Flip screen? No sense holding your breath on this one.  Until Digic V materializes, the 7D seems fine where it is.

And when the Sony A77 debuts with 24MP on APS-C, for a price well under the 7D?

1483
EOS Bodies / Re: Stoke the 1D Mark V Fire
« on: August 08, 2011, 09:21:47 AM »
I wonder if those guys are now playing with some of the readers here by twitter?

and I wonder how much direction canon is putting into it...

1484
EOS Bodies / Re: A Breakdown of Rumors
« on: August 08, 2011, 09:19:10 AM »
How could you forget to mention the 7D Mark2 in your summary?!?!?!

And perhaps you should add a paragraph like this...

"Should you buy a 5D Mark2 or wait for the 5D Mark3? If you want to wait 9 months before you can hold the camera, then yes, wait. Expect the pre-order figures for the 5D Mark3 to be large, the queues long and no discounts or rebates for quite some time."

1485
EOS Bodies / Re: 5D Mark III & More Information [CR1]
« on: August 07, 2011, 05:52:11 PM »
If the 1D MarkV sensor tech is used for the next set of crop cameras then...

@28MP, 1.6x = 10 MP
@32MP, 1.6x = 12.5 MP
@36MP, 1.6x = 14 MP

... so this must be some reference to the engineering that makes up the sensor, not the actual pixel pitch.

Pages: 1 ... 97 98 [99] 100 101 ... 119