February 28, 2015, 04:09:22 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - sandymandy

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16 17 ... 41
211
Lenses / Re: Resistance to Larger Filter Size, Kills Great Lenses?
« on: February 03, 2013, 12:21:59 PM »
It would have nearly looked like a 200mm 2.0 front lens lolz

212
Lenses / Re: What's the best deal you've ever gotten on a lens?
« on: February 03, 2013, 12:02:01 PM »
3 m42 lenses for 100 euro including flektogon 35mm

213
Portrait / Re: Portrait work
« on: February 03, 2013, 04:05:16 AM »
no problem im often writing in gibberish so its hard to understand me

214
Import duty will be round about 10-20 percent.

215
Portrait / Re: Portrait work
« on: February 01, 2013, 11:58:18 AM »
I uploaded the photo to show that it was edited in a bad way. If u brighten up other low key photos do u think u will also see fat photoshop brush lines and lost details that were just left in the photo cuz the one who edited it didnt have a proper adjusted screen??

 If u brighten up lowkey photos the black should only become grey....

OP used 100% black color brush (i guess) cuz on his screen all looked "100% black" im quite sure of this. But if u take a photo there is like nearly never 100% black...

I didnt add anything to the original image..... Its just like that... and i can see it on my screen!

216
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon Confirms 70D; Future of Semi-Pro DSLR is FF
« on: February 01, 2013, 11:47:48 AM »
flawed logic.. you will always have more reach with a crop and a 1.4 TC. :)

And how many people are actually using a 1.4TC on an APS-C body? Its quite rare imho. I can also say add more n more extension rings if u just care about reach....flawed logic


Only advantage of APS-C is reach and price. But u dont have to save a lot more to get a better FF body than the endlevel APS-C. Yes, i hate APS-C or anything smaller than FF :P Still using it tough  ::)
I just think there are too many Canon DSLR models and levels. They should have entry, advanced and pro. Why there is like super entry (xxxxD), normal entry (xxxD), upper entry (xxD) advanced (7D) upper advance (6D) end Advanced (5D) and pro (1dX)? Its just too many imho. And all APS-C produce the same image quality. mostly the rebels even produce better images then the 7D cuz they get updated more often  ::)
I would NEVER get a 7D if it gives the same IQ as the cheapest DSLR from Canon. Paying so much money just for a better body material is ridicoulus imho. Or wow 10 FPS? Press and pray is not my style... If i wanna be somewhat professional id at least get a 5D.

217
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon Confirms 70D; Future of Semi-Pro DSLR is FF
« on: February 01, 2013, 04:44:40 AM »
There is no reason not to have FF cameras except production cost. that will be solved in the future and hopefully all cameras will be FF. Tough i guess APS-C will still always be around. I mean "back in the days" everybody was fine with 35mm film also  :o

A good step Canon :P Just get 1.4TC for reach...

218
Portrait / Re: Portrait work
« on: January 31, 2013, 11:59:40 AM »
Well im not sure...but i think u should adjust ur screen :P especially in the first photo it looks like u used some black photoshop brush to fix ur image but i think u didnt see how much information there really is in the photo.

i enhanced it to show u what i mean :P i ONLY raised the exposure/brightness nothing else

guess on ur screen it just looked "black" ^^


219
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Canon may be expensive but...
« on: January 31, 2013, 11:45:51 AM »
I think people with a normal income dont even think about getting the highend tele lenses anyway :) I just like Canon no matter what Nikon does. Im fine with my gear and so should u!

220
Technical Support / Re: SSL Certificate Error
« on: January 30, 2013, 03:32:24 PM »
I think you always have to install from Disc the first time, cuz the online downloads from Canon are just updates.

221
Technical Support / Seagull 6x6 Shutter problem (?)
« on: January 30, 2013, 07:18:36 AM »
hi,

i noticed when using my seagull 6x6 that as long as i press the shutter button the shutter will stay open. its no problem for slower shutter times since i will press down the shutter and take away my finger fast enough. When using faster shutter speeds im not sure anymore if i perhaps kept the shutter open too long. I cant guarantee when using 1/300 that my finger is 1/300 or less while pressing the shutter.
The walkaround i found is using self-timer.

is this normal? i think praktica mtl5b had the same...

222
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Sigma Announces New 30mm f/1.4 for APS-C
« on: January 29, 2013, 07:17:57 AM »
Hope the price will be reasonable. Im not too fond of buying APS-C lenses when going FF one day. If it has the same IQ as the 35mm 1.4 then its a no-brainer tough :P

223
Lighting / Re: Buying Yongnuo Flash
« on: January 28, 2013, 03:14:33 PM »
I wanna spend the least amount i can spend while getting something valueable and useful in the long term. I got one old flash for free with an x-sync cable. Is it possible to use this with my 1100D in some way or is it electric overkill? Hotshoe is a no-go i know due to high voltage but is it the same for x-sync cable usage? Its Revue 280T and trigger voltage supposed to be ~10,5 volts

224
EOS Bodies / Re: Big megapixel camera?
« on: January 28, 2013, 12:41:21 PM »
Maybe its going to be medium format including a bigger lens mount. Who knows when...

225
Canon General / Re: Why did you choose Canon?
« on: January 26, 2013, 07:16:10 PM »
The nifty fifty got me :)

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16 17 ... 41