January 27, 2015, 08:43:43 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - PVS

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 7
EOS Bodies / Re: Poll: Most wanted new features for 5D Mark IV
« on: December 22, 2014, 02:59:14 PM »
I don't know if anyone mentioned but selectable aspect ratios would be real nice. 4x5, to be exact, with nice masking in the viewfinder.



Canon General / Re: Does Canon really deserve this?
« on: November 26, 2014, 07:48:44 AM »
It's like grafitti. You see them on the wall not because everybody's into grafitti but because very few are. Sometimes they're ugly, stupid and pointless while ither times they can be thought provoking raising questions on certain issues.
They don't represent the opinion of majority and can be offending but in other times can raise awareness on certain issues.

EOS Bodies / Re: Another 50mp FF DSLR Mention [CR2]
« on: November 24, 2014, 08:36:35 PM »
It's a pity how talk got polarized  in last year on this forum, it's like a fascism mindset "either you're with us or you're against us!".
If people don't see any room for improvement in certain areas than there won't be any. The reason why we got excellent AF in bodies such as 5dmk3 and 1dx is because people constantly complained. But even when you know fire feeds fire it's still sad to see intelligent people get polarised like that and dig their heads in the sand.

RIP FakeChuckWestfall.

EOS Bodies / Re: Patent: Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L II
« on: November 13, 2014, 08:39:51 PM »
It doesn't take 3 minutes, I remember being surprised by strong summer showers and it took half a minute to get 5Dmk3 and 24-70/2.8mk2 stop working.. Took the battery out, let it sit and dry for some time and no problems after that, worked flawlessly. I also remember spilling a bottle of beer accidently on S35A mounted on 5Dmk3 and no issues at all. Weather sealing is not a guarantee by any means.

But other than that I'm really sceptic that S35A will get a serious optical rival with 35Lmk2 release. Maybe equal performer. Unless they're packing otus type of lens for moarrr megapixies, who knows. Even so, it'll be late for the game for most of the users, not everybody needs a cannon mounted on their cameras so they can shoot it wide open on ~36mp sensors.

Ever since film days I grew the habit of having at least one camera with my all the time. I love my 5dmk3 and consider it zee best dslr ever but it's big & heavy. Lenses too. So I got the A7. It's nice and I found use for bunch of my lenses from film era. Camera is small and light and so are the lenses. I don't mind not having AF. It's feels like digital FE2. Nice everyday camera never too obtrusive and never too heavy to carry. The IQ is great up to ~400ISO, above that 5Dmk3 just hammers it in every aspect.
I am not a fanboy, I'm just a professional photographer and a tool is a tool. If you can afford yourself having two separate camera system then do it, don't exclude yourself from pleasure.

EOS Bodies / Re: Custom Dials - what do YOU do with it?
« on: November 12, 2014, 03:48:31 AM »
C1 - aperture priority with auto iso
C2 - B&W aperture priority with auto iso less expanded, AI servo ON.
C3 - landscape mode

DOF preview button - AI Servo activation.

EOS Bodies / Re: Patent: Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L II
« on: November 11, 2014, 08:30:30 PM »
I have "the" love for 35mil focal length. My love is big: 5 different fast 35s in 3 different mounts (EF, F, MD) plus 4 different film PnS' with 35/2.8 fixed lenses on them. Last year I bought the Sigma 35 and kept it stuck on 5Dmk3 and to be honest with you I don't know what else I could ask for from a fast 35mil prime, that lens is stellar. I don't deny some minor AF issues with artificial type of light but it's a $850 lens and I had similar issues with 35L AF  behaving inconsistently on 2 different 5Dmk2 bodies - being flawless on one and completely inconsistent at some distances on the other. If 35Lmk2 was released last year I'd have serious dilemma on deciding which one to choose but now I really can't think of single feature new L lens shall deliver that would make me sell Sigma so I can spend ~$1.5k on L lens. Weather sealing? It's mostly a gimmick and I know how far non sealed lenses can go anyway (A LOT).

Very stimulating post for both manufacturers... Not!!!

Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Nikon 20mm f/1.8
« on: October 27, 2014, 03:32:46 PM »
. And now it's this great looking 20/1.8. What a great astro photography lens, not to mention landscapes.

That was my thought exactly until I read this review:

Distinct coma issues won't make it that much useful for astrophotography unless vortex light benders  in corners are your style.

Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Pentax 645z
« on: April 17, 2014, 08:24:19 AM »
The lack of interest and excitement for such a versatile high-res machine like this one on this forum is beyond me.

Keep in mind that it sits right between the much cheaper(+lens sharing) A7r which offers almost the same linear resolution and the established MF systems, with the latter offering a much broader selection of backs, lens options and widespread rental to make case-by-case useage feasable.
Its neither for those who are on a budget nor for those who aren't, but in some limbo inbetween.

Coming from the film era and having owned various MF cameras I guess I don't belong to the linear resolution bandwagon theorists, thus my lack of understanding for lack of appreciation for a tool such as this.

Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Pentax 645z
« on: April 16, 2014, 10:57:42 PM »
1/125s will be bummer for outdoor shooting but for anything inside the studio.. Anyhow, if it's an important matter one can always override this by using manual 75&135mm leaf shutter lenses @1/500s.

The lack of interest and excitement for such a versatile high-res machine like this one on this forum is beyond me.
Anyway, enjoy these samples:

Third Party Manufacturers / Pentax 645z
« on: April 12, 2014, 10:15:04 PM »
The specs list looks quite promising:

And the price tag is quite intriquing..

Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Fuji Full Frame X-PRO2 coming 2015
« on: April 11, 2014, 09:21:49 AM »
I doubt Fuji will go FF if their FF lenses continue to implement same design philosophy from X series. The physics. Those supposed FF lenses wouldn't differ that much from their dSLR counterparts in terms of size. The same reason you won't see much of the fast to moderately fast primes/zooms with built in IS in Sony's A7 lens line-up, that 55/1.8 already looks a tad bit ridiculous on a small body like a7.

<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2014/04/we-have-more-internal-canon-service-information-on-lenses-cameras/"></g:plusone></div><div style="float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/2014/04/we-have-more-internal-canon-service-information-on-lenses-cameras/">Tweet</a></div>
Yesterday we posted an <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2014/04/eos-1d-x-eos-1d-c-cold-weather-autofocus-issues/" target="_blank">internal service advisory for the Canon EOS-1D X and EOS-1D C</a>. These are advisories that are only known to a select few within Canon and not told to the consumers.</p>
<p>We have a lot of more of these documents that cover various Canon lenses and camera bodies, there’s even more on the EOS-1D X mirrorbox.</p>
<p>The person that sent them to us didn’t have an issue with Canon keeping this stuff internal. However, they were upset that a lot of the issues are known to Canon and they’re still charging customers for the repairs out of warranty. There are a couple of lenses with design flaws and Canon is charging $250-$450 for these repairs out of warranty and not fully disclosing the design flaw to the customer.</p>
<p>We’re not sure whether or not we’ll post the rest of the internal documents we have in our possession. If you think there’s value in us doing so, <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=20341.0">please sound off in our forum</a>.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Must be the radiation levels in Japan. Now, that's a serious issue that the public needs to know more about.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 7